NCT04302792

Brief Summary

The ONCOFOOD project aims to design and develop new innovative food solutions for cancer patients, taking into account not only their nutritional requirements but also their sensory changes, promoting eating pleasure and preventing malnutrition. Research involving cancer patients but also their families and health care professionals is a key element of this approach to ensure the success of the developed products for the target group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 28, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 9, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2021

Status Verified

June 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 28, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 11, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

taste & smell alterationstexture-modified foodstaste-optimised foodscancer patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Acceptability of developed texture-modified food 1

    Acceptability of texture-modified food 1 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 2 visit day 1

  • Acceptability of developed texture-modified food 2

    Acceptability of texture-modified food 2 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 2 visit day 2

  • Acceptability of developed texture-modified food 3

    Acceptability of texture-modified food 3 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 2 visit day 3

  • Acceptability of developed taste-optimised food 1

    Acceptability of taste-optimised food 1 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 3 visit day 1

  • Acceptability of developed taste-optimised food 2

    Acceptability of taste-optimised food 2 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 3 visit day 2

  • Acceptability of developed taste-optimised food 3

    Acceptability of taste-optimised food 3 using a questionnaire. Participants will be asked to rate their liking of appearance, aroma, taste, texture and overall using a 9-point hedonic scale where 1 is "dislike extremely" and 9 is "like extremely". They will also be asked to indicate their preference in comparison to usual products using a 5-point scale where 1 is "I much preferred this product to my usual products" and 5 is "I much prefer my usual products to this one". They will be asked to indicate whether they would buy this product using a 5-point scale where 1 is "definitely would buy" and 5 is "definitely would not buy".

    1 hour on Stage 3 visit day 3

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Food diary

    7 consecutive days

  • Interviews

    1 hour session on Stage 1 visit day 1

  • Focus group

    2 hour session on Stage 1 visit day 2

  • Focus group

    2 hour session on Stage 1 visit day 3

Study Arms (3)

Stage 1: Interviews and focus group sessions

NO INTERVENTION

Group A: Cancer patients (requiring or have required texture-modified foods and/or experiencing or have experienced taste\&smell alterations in the last 12 months) will be required to attend a one-hour online interview. Group B: Relatives of cancer patients (requiring texture-modified foods and/or experiencing taste\&smell alterations) will be required to attend a 2-hour online focus group session. Group C: Healthcare professionals with a minimum of a year's experience with oncological patients that require texture-modified foods and/or have taste \& smell alteration will be required to attend a 2-hour online focus group session. A food diary will be given to Group A and B to complete for 7-days prior to their session. Topics to be discussed during the interview and the focus group sessions will include the food requirements of cancer patients, the barriers of the current food products, possible solutions to these requirements if any and their expectations towards new food solutions.

Stage 2: Texture-modified foods for cancer patients

EXPERIMENTAL

The study will involve conducting a tasting trial over a 2-weeks period where participants will be required to consume a maximum of three 3D printed texture-modified food based on the findings from Stage 1 and evaluate the food product by completing a structured questionnaire. Key questions areas covered by the questionnaire include appetite, sensory characteristics of the product (taste, flavour, mouthfeel/texture and smell), liking and acceptability, purchase intent and best place to buy the products; questions will involve rating scales as well as qualitative comments.

Behavioral: Texture-modified foods for cancer patients (Stage 2)

Stage 3: Taste-optimised foods for cancer patients

EXPERIMENTAL

The study will involve conducting a home test over a one-month period where participants will be required to consume taste-optimised products based on the findings from Stage 1 and evaluate the food product by completing a structured questionnaire. Key questions areas covered by the questionnaire include appetite, sensory characteristics of the product (taste, flavour, mouthfeel/texture and smell), liking and acceptability, purchase intent and best place to buy the products; questions will involve rating scales as well as qualitative comments.

Behavioral: Taste-optimised foods for cancer patients (Stage 3)

Interventions

Participants (cancer patients that require texture-modified foods) will be expected to evaluate a maximum of three meals over a 2-weeks period.

Stage 2: Texture-modified foods for cancer patients

Participants (cancer patients with taste \& smell alterations) will be expected to evaluate three foods at home over a period of one month.

Stage 3: Taste-optimised foods for cancer patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Stage 1
  • Group A - Patients
  • Adults 18-65 years old.
  • Currently undergoing oncological treatment or have undergone oncological treatment in the last 12 months.
  • Patients that require or have required texture-modified foods and/ or experience or have experienced taste \& smell alterations in the last 12 months.
  • Group B - Relatives and caregivers
  • Over 18 years old.
  • Relative or caregiver of an adult oncological patient (that require texture-modified foods and/ or experience taste \& smell alterations).
  • Living/caring for someone that is currently undergoing or have undergone oncological treatment.
  • Participates actively in cooking and buying food for a household of which the person currently undergoing oncological treatment is a member.
  • Group C - Healthcare professionals
  • Dietitians, speech and language therapists, medical/clinical oncologists, cancer specialist nurses, and oncology social workers and counselors.
  • Minimum of a year's experience with oncological patients that require texture-modified foods and/or having taste \& smell alterations.
  • Stage 2
  • Adults 18-65 years old.
  • +6 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals below 18 years old will be excluded from the study.
  • Individuals with dietary intolerances or allergies to the foods that will be tested in the study (Stages 2 and 3 only).
  • Individuals who do not have the ability or capacity to consent.
  • Individuals who are nil by mouth or have nasal gastric tubes of other feeding tubes inserted.
  • Individuals who need modified solid and liquid diets due to problems with swallowing (Stage 3 only).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sensory Science Centre, Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading

Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Tueros I, Uriarte M. Innovative food products for cancer patients: future directions. J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Mar;98(5):1647-1652. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8789. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

    PMID: 29168190BACKGROUND
  • Wickham RS, Rehwaldt M, Kefer C, Shott S, Abbas K, Glynn-Tucker E, Potter C, Blendowski C. Taste changes experienced by patients receiving chemotherapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999 May;26(4):697-706.

    PMID: 10337648BACKGROUND
  • Lovell SJ, Wong HB, Loh KS, Ngo RY, Wilson JA. Impact of dysphagia on quality-of-life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2005 Oct;27(10):864-72. doi: 10.1002/hed.20250.

    PMID: 16114007BACKGROUND
  • Amezaga J, Alfaro B, Rios Y, Larraioz A, Ugartemendia G, Urruticoechea A, Tueros I. Assessing taste and smell alterations in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy according to treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Dec;26(12):4077-4086. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4277-z. Epub 2018 May 31.

    PMID: 29855774BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Taste DisordersFood Preferences

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsFeeding BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Stella Lignou, PhD

    University of Reading

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
All samples provided to the participant are labelled with 3 digit random codes.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This is a 3 stage study design. The first stage will be a qualitative part with interviews and focus group sessions. In the second and third stages participants will evaluate food products. The second and third stages of the study will be conducted single blind as it is not feasible to blind the researcher.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer in Sensory and Consumer Science

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2020

First Posted

March 10, 2020

Study Start

June 9, 2020

Primary Completion

December 31, 2020

Study Completion

December 31, 2020

Last Updated

June 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No personal identification data will be shared. The study is not under an obligation to share data, however it is possible that some of the individual (unliked / non identifiable) data will be useful in a meta analysis and, hence sharing individual participant data (IPD) will be considered.

Locations