Dialysate Temperature in Peritoneal Dialysis
TPD
Influence of Dialysate Temperature on Peritoneal Creatinine Clearance in Patients in Peritoneal Dialysis
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) are encouraged to warm dialysate to 37°C before peritoneal infusion; main international PD guidelines do not provide specific recommendation, and patients generally warm dialysate batches partially or do not warm them at all. Warming of dialysate is a time-consuming procedure, not free from potential risks (i.e. degradation of glucose), and should be justified by a clear clinical benefit. The investigators designed a single blind randomized controlled trial where PD patients were randomized to receive a peritoneal equilibration test either with dialysate at a controlled temperature of 37°C (intervention group) or with dialysate warmed with conventional methods (control group). Primary end-point was a higher peritoneal creatinine clearance in patients in the intervention group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2020
CompletedMarch 10, 2020
March 1, 2020
3 months
March 6, 2020
March 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
peritoneal creatinine clearance
Peritoneal clearance of creatinine was calculated with the following formula: Cx = \[Dx\] x dialysate volume / \[Px\] / 240 where Cx represents clearance of creatinine expressed in ml/min, \[Dx\] represents the concentration of creatinine in dialysate at the end of the exchange (4 hours) expressed in mg/dl, dialysate volume represents the total volume drained at the end of the exchange (4 hours), \[Px\] represents the concentration of creatinine in plasma after 2 hours from the beginning of the exchange expressed in mg/dl and 240 represents minutes contained in the 4 hours of the exchange.
4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test
Secondary Outcomes (2)
peritoneal urea clearance
4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test
creatinine and urea mass transfer area coefficient
4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALPatients received Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET). In the intervention group, dialysate was warmed in a specific microwave oven calibrated to 37°C and infusion temperature was confirmed to be 37°C before infusion
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients received Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET). In the control group, current practice was used (batch warming with a pad calibrated to 37°C) and dialysate temperature was measured just before infusion.
Interventions
during a PET test, patients received peritoneal dialysate warmed at 37°C before infusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age \> 18 years
- ability to give informed consent
- peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment
- PD vintage of more than 3 months
- absence of signs of active acute systemic or localized infections at least four weeks apart from the trial
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena
Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 41124, Italy
Related Publications (13)
Fernandez-Reyes MJ, Bajo MA, Del Peso G, Ossorio M, Diaz R, Carretero B, Selgas R. The influence of initial peritoneal transport characteristics, inflammation, and high glucose exposure on prognosis for peritoneal membrane function. Perit Dial Int. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):636-44. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00137. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PMID: 22473036BACKGROUNDBargman JM, Krediet RT, Lo WK, Selgas R, del Peso G, Auxiliadora Bajo M, Mujais S. What are the problems with using the peritoneal membrane for long-term dialysis? Semin Dial. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00385_1.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 18251949BACKGROUNDAroeira LS, Aguilera A, Sanchez-Tomero JA, Bajo MA, del Peso G, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Selgas R, Lopez-Cabrera M. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and peritoneal membrane failure in peritoneal dialysis patients: pathologic significance and potential therapeutic interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jul;18(7):2004-13. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006111292. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
PMID: 17568021BACKGROUNDDombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M, Gokal R, Heimburger O, Krediet R, Plum J, Rodrigues A, Selgas R, Struijk D, Verger C; EBPG Expert Group on Peritoneal Dialysis. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 7 Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 9:ix24-ix27. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi1121. No abstract available.
PMID: 16263748BACKGROUNDWelten AG, Schalkwijk CG, ter Wee PM, Meijer S, van den Born J, Beelen RJ. Single exposure of mesothelial cells to glucose degradation products (GDPs) yields early advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and a proinflammatory response. Perit Dial Int. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):213-21.
PMID: 12938820BACKGROUNDFontana F, Ballestri M, Makomi C, Morandi R, Cappelli G. Hemorheologic alterations in peritoneal dialysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;65(2):175-183. doi: 10.3233/CH-16152.
PMID: 27340762BACKGROUNDGross M, McDonald HP Jr. Effect of dialysate temperature and flow rate on peritoneal clearance. JAMA. 1967 Oct 23;202(4):363-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 6072310BACKGROUNDIndraprasit S, Namwongprom A, Sooksriwongse C, Buri PS. Effect of dialysate temperature on peritoneal clearances. Nephron. 1983;34(1):45-7. doi: 10.1159/000182977.
PMID: 6855994BACKGROUNDSaghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 9;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26.
PMID: 15535880BACKGROUNDTeixido-Planas J. Peritoneal function and adequacy calculations: current programs versus PD Adequest 2.0. Perit Dial Int. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):386-93.
PMID: 12227398BACKGROUNDFigueiredo AE, Goodlad C, Clemenger M, Haddoub SS, McGrory J, Pryde K, Tonkins E, Hisole N, Brown EA. Evaluation of physical symptoms in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:305424. doi: 10.1155/2012/305424. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
PMID: 23050149BACKGROUNDTwardowski ZJ. Clinical value of standardized equilibration tests in CAPD patients. Blood Purif. 1989;7(2-3):95-108. doi: 10.1159/000169582.
PMID: 2663040BACKGROUNDFontana F, Torelli C, Giovanella S, Ligabue G, Alfano G, Gerritsen K, Selgas R, Cappelli G. Influence of dialysate temperature on creatinine peritoneal clearance in peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized trial. BMC Nephrol. 2020 Oct 27;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02113-z.
PMID: 33109094DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gianni Cappelli, Professor
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2020
First Posted
March 10, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 24, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2018
Last Updated
March 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share