NCT04302649

Brief Summary

Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) are encouraged to warm dialysate to 37°C before peritoneal infusion; main international PD guidelines do not provide specific recommendation, and patients generally warm dialysate batches partially or do not warm them at all. Warming of dialysate is a time-consuming procedure, not free from potential risks (i.e. degradation of glucose), and should be justified by a clear clinical benefit. The investigators designed a single blind randomized controlled trial where PD patients were randomized to receive a peritoneal equilibration test either with dialysate at a controlled temperature of 37°C (intervention group) or with dialysate warmed with conventional methods (control group). Primary end-point was a higher peritoneal creatinine clearance in patients in the intervention group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 24, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

peritoneal dialysisdialysate temperatureperitoneal creatinine clearance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • peritoneal creatinine clearance

    Peritoneal clearance of creatinine was calculated with the following formula: Cx = \[Dx\] x dialysate volume / \[Px\] / 240 where Cx represents clearance of creatinine expressed in ml/min, \[Dx\] represents the concentration of creatinine in dialysate at the end of the exchange (4 hours) expressed in mg/dl, dialysate volume represents the total volume drained at the end of the exchange (4 hours), \[Px\] represents the concentration of creatinine in plasma after 2 hours from the beginning of the exchange expressed in mg/dl and 240 represents minutes contained in the 4 hours of the exchange.

    4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • peritoneal urea clearance

    4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test

  • creatinine and urea mass transfer area coefficient

    4 hours - Peritoneal equilibration test

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET). In the intervention group, dialysate was warmed in a specific microwave oven calibrated to 37°C and infusion temperature was confirmed to be 37°C before infusion

Drug: peritoneal dialysate at 37°C temperature

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients received Peritoneal Equilibration Test (PET). In the control group, current practice was used (batch warming with a pad calibrated to 37°C) and dialysate temperature was measured just before infusion.

Interventions

during a PET test, patients received peritoneal dialysate warmed at 37°C before infusion

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age \> 18 years
  • ability to give informed consent
  • peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment
  • PD vintage of more than 3 months
  • absence of signs of active acute systemic or localized infections at least four weeks apart from the trial

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 41124, Italy

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Fernandez-Reyes MJ, Bajo MA, Del Peso G, Ossorio M, Diaz R, Carretero B, Selgas R. The influence of initial peritoneal transport characteristics, inflammation, and high glucose exposure on prognosis for peritoneal membrane function. Perit Dial Int. 2012 Nov-Dec;32(6):636-44. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00137. Epub 2012 Apr 2.

    PMID: 22473036BACKGROUND
  • Bargman JM, Krediet RT, Lo WK, Selgas R, del Peso G, Auxiliadora Bajo M, Mujais S. What are the problems with using the peritoneal membrane for long-term dialysis? Semin Dial. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00385_1.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18251949BACKGROUND
  • Aroeira LS, Aguilera A, Sanchez-Tomero JA, Bajo MA, del Peso G, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Selgas R, Lopez-Cabrera M. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition and peritoneal membrane failure in peritoneal dialysis patients: pathologic significance and potential therapeutic interventions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jul;18(7):2004-13. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006111292. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

    PMID: 17568021BACKGROUND
  • Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M, Gokal R, Heimburger O, Krediet R, Plum J, Rodrigues A, Selgas R, Struijk D, Verger C; EBPG Expert Group on Peritoneal Dialysis. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 7 Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 Dec;20 Suppl 9:ix24-ix27. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi1121. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16263748BACKGROUND
  • Welten AG, Schalkwijk CG, ter Wee PM, Meijer S, van den Born J, Beelen RJ. Single exposure of mesothelial cells to glucose degradation products (GDPs) yields early advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and a proinflammatory response. Perit Dial Int. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):213-21.

    PMID: 12938820BACKGROUND
  • Fontana F, Ballestri M, Makomi C, Morandi R, Cappelli G. Hemorheologic alterations in peritoneal dialysis. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;65(2):175-183. doi: 10.3233/CH-16152.

    PMID: 27340762BACKGROUND
  • Gross M, McDonald HP Jr. Effect of dialysate temperature and flow rate on peritoneal clearance. JAMA. 1967 Oct 23;202(4):363-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6072310BACKGROUND
  • Indraprasit S, Namwongprom A, Sooksriwongse C, Buri PS. Effect of dialysate temperature on peritoneal clearances. Nephron. 1983;34(1):45-7. doi: 10.1159/000182977.

    PMID: 6855994BACKGROUND
  • Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 9;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26.

    PMID: 15535880BACKGROUND
  • Teixido-Planas J. Peritoneal function and adequacy calculations: current programs versus PD Adequest 2.0. Perit Dial Int. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):386-93.

    PMID: 12227398BACKGROUND
  • Figueiredo AE, Goodlad C, Clemenger M, Haddoub SS, McGrory J, Pryde K, Tonkins E, Hisole N, Brown EA. Evaluation of physical symptoms in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Int J Nephrol. 2012;2012:305424. doi: 10.1155/2012/305424. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

    PMID: 23050149BACKGROUND
  • Twardowski ZJ. Clinical value of standardized equilibration tests in CAPD patients. Blood Purif. 1989;7(2-3):95-108. doi: 10.1159/000169582.

    PMID: 2663040BACKGROUND
  • Fontana F, Torelli C, Giovanella S, Ligabue G, Alfano G, Gerritsen K, Selgas R, Cappelli G. Influence of dialysate temperature on creatinine peritoneal clearance in peritoneal dialysis patients: a randomized trial. BMC Nephrol. 2020 Oct 27;21(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02113-z.

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Gianni Cappelli, Professor

    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2020

First Posted

March 10, 2020

Study Start

October 1, 2018

Primary Completion

December 24, 2018

Study Completion

December 31, 2018

Last Updated

March 10, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations