Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Study: Evaluating Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) for Constipation
An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Based Bowel Protocol for the Management of Constipation in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Constipation is a common condition, which occurs one in four Canadians. Maintaining regular bowel movements is imperative because constipation can affect the quality of PD dialysate flow and result in an unwanted effect on the dialysis adequacy. There is limited data on how to best manage constipation in the peritoneal dialysis population. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is an osmotic laxative that is becoming popular for prevention and treatment of constipation across Canada. Although some PD programs in Canada have already converted to PEG for management of constipation, more research in this population would help guide practice. For now, the current PD bowel regimen at the Nova Scotia Health Authority (NSHA) includes daily preventative therapy using a stimulant laxative, senna, along with an osmotic laxative, lactulose, for acute constipation. The investigators will review all patients in the NSHA PD program who have regular or recent laxative use for participation in this study. Patients included in this study will be randomly assigned to the Current Bowel Protocol or the PEG Bowel Protocol for 8 weeks. The goal is to determine if the PEG Bowel Protocol is as effective and safe for the prevention of constipation as the Current Bowel Protocol used in the PD Program. The investigators will use bowel function diaries and patient surveys to determine efficacy and safety outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jul 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2018
CompletedAugust 21, 2024
August 1, 2024
9 months
March 14, 2017
August 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of constipation treatment success
Successful treatment of constipation will be defined based on a modified ROME criteria developed by Dipalma 2007: relief of constipation for more than 50% of the weeks in the study.
8 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of patients with laxative related adverse effects.
8 weeks.
Mean change from baseline on the PAC-SYM questionnaire
8 weeks.
Mean change from baseline on the PAC-QOL questionnaire
8 weeks
Incidence of peritoneal dialysis treatment failure requiring intervention
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Current Bowel Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive the Current Bowel Protocol with senna. Lactulose will be used for rescue therapy.
PEG Bowel Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive the Protocol with Polyethylene Glycol 3350. Lactulose will be used for rescue therapy.
Interventions
Stimulant and Osmotic Laxatives.
Osmotic Laxatives.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients in the peritoneal dialysis program in Nova Scotia who are currently taking laxatives.
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy or intolerance to any of the study laxatives (PEG, senna, lactulose); cognitive impairment or inability to document symptoms; known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or ileus; known or planned pregnancy; no laxative use in the last 3 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Elizabeth Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
Related Publications (23)
Mimidis K, Mourvati E, Kaliontzidou M, Papadopoulos V, Thodis E, Kartalis G, Vargemezis V. Efficacy of polyethylene glycol in constipated CAPD patients. Perit Dial Int. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):601-3. No abstract available.
PMID: 16411529BACKGROUNDSetyapranata S, Holt SG. The Gut in Older Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2015 Nov;35(6):650-4. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00341.
PMID: 26702007BACKGROUNDPare P, Ferrazzi S, Thompson WG, Irvine EJ, Rance L. An epidemiological survey of constipation in canada: definitions, rates, demographics, and predictors of health care seeking. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Nov;96(11):3130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.05259.x.
PMID: 11721760BACKGROUNDSutton D, Dumbleton S, Allaway C. Can increased dietary fibre reduce laxative requirement in peritoneal dialysis patients? J Ren Care. 2007 Oct-Dec;33(4):174-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2007.tb00068.x.
PMID: 18298035BACKGROUNDSutton D, Ovington S, Engel B. A multi-centre, randomised trial to assess whether increased dietary fibre intake (using a fibre supplement or high-fibre foods) produces healthy bowel performance and reduces laxative requirement in free living patients on peritoneal dialysis. J Ren Care. 2014 Sep;40(3):157-63. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12056. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PMID: 24650128BACKGROUNDDessau RB, Olsen OB, Frifelt JJ, Skott H. Influence of psyllium seed husk on azotemia, electrolytes, and bowel regulation in patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int. 1989;9(4):351. No abstract available.
PMID: 2488394BACKGROUNDPare P. The approach to diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation: suggestions for a general practitioner. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct;25 Suppl B(Suppl B):36B-40B. doi: 10.1155/2011/368189.
PMID: 22114756BACKGROUNDLiu LW. Chronic constipation: current treatment options. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct;25 Suppl B(Suppl B):22B-28B.
PMID: 22114754BACKGROUNDSchuster BG, Kosar L, Kamrul R. Constipation in older adults: stepwise approach to keep things moving. Can Fam Physician. 2015 Feb;61(2):152-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 25676646BACKGROUNDRamkumar D, Rao SS. Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapies for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):936-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40925.x.
PMID: 15784043BACKGROUNDHsieh C. Treatment of constipation in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Dec 1;72(11):2277-84.
PMID: 16342852BACKGROUNDDi Palma JA, Smith JR, Cleveland Mv. Overnight efficacy of polyethylene glycol laxative. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;97(7):1776-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05840.x.
PMID: 12135034BACKGROUNDAttar A, Lemann M, Ferguson A, Halphen M, Boutron MC, Flourie B, Alix E, Salmeron M, Guillemot F, Chaussade S, Menard AM, Moreau J, Naudin G, Barthet M. Comparison of a low dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution with lactulose for treatment of chronic constipation. Gut. 1999 Feb;44(2):226-30. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.2.226.
PMID: 9895382BACKGROUNDLee-Robichaud H, Thomas K, Morgan J, Nelson RL. Lactulose versus Polyethylene Glycol for Chronic Constipation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jul 7;(7):CD007570. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007570.pub2.
PMID: 20614462BACKGROUNDChristie AH, Culbert P, Guest JF. Economic impact of low dose polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes compared with lactulose in the management of idiopathic constipation in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(1):49-60. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220010-00005.
PMID: 11817992BACKGROUNDTaylor RR, Guest JF. The cost-effectiveness of macrogol 3350 compared to lactulose in the treatment of adults suffering from chronic constipation in the UK. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):302-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04191.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
PMID: 19886948BACKGROUNDLongstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1480-91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061.
PMID: 16678561BACKGROUNDBove A, Pucciani F, Bellini M, Battaglia E, Bocchini R, Altomare DF, Dodi G, Sciaudone G, Falletto E, Piloni V, Gambaccini D, Bove V. Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: diagnosis). World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr 14;18(14):1555-64. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i14.1555.
PMID: 22529683BACKGROUNDYiannakou Y, Piessevaux H, Bouchoucha M, Schiefke I, Filip R, Gabalec L, Dina I, Stephenson D, Kerstens R, Etherson K, Levine A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prucalopride in men with chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 May;110(5):741-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.115. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25869393BACKGROUNDDipalma JA, Cleveland MV, McGowan J, Herrera JL. A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of polyethylene glycol laxative for chronic treatment of chronic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;102(7):1436-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01199.x. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
PMID: 17403074BACKGROUNDMarquis P, De La Loge C, Dubois D, McDermott A, Chassany O. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;40(5):540-51. doi: 10.1080/00365520510012208.
PMID: 16036506BACKGROUNDFrank L, Kleinman L, Farup C, Taylor L, Miner P Jr. Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;34(9):870-7. doi: 10.1080/003655299750025327.
PMID: 10522604BACKGROUNDGokal R, Alexander S, Ash S, Chen TW, Danielson A, Holmes C, Joffe P, Moncrief J, Nichols K, Piraino B, Prowant B, Slingeneyer A, Stegmayr B, Twardowski Z, Vas S. Peritoneal catheters and exit-site practices toward optimum peritoneal access: 1998 update. (Official report from the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis). Perit Dial Int. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):11-33. No abstract available.
PMID: 9527026BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jaclyn Y Tran, BScPharm
Nova Scotia Health Authority
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Open Label
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2017
First Posted
May 10, 2017
Study Start
July 7, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 5, 2018
Last Updated
August 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share