Safety and Efficacy of Combining Intranasal Insulin & Acute Exercise
Placebo Controlled Phase II Clinical Trial: Safety and Efficacy of Combining Intranasal Insulin & Acute Exercise
1 other identifier
interventional
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if physical activity engagement alters the dose-response profile and safety of administration of insulin into the intranasal mucosa.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 3, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 21, 2021
CompletedJune 21, 2021
May 1, 2021
1.7 years
February 28, 2020
March 19, 2021
May 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom at Any Point During the Protocol
The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. Burning/tingling of the nose and watering/tearing of the eyes during the nasal spray were the most cited symptoms.
During the 20 minute exercise/control period and the cognitive assessments.
Number of Participants With Manifestation of Any Symptom Following the Protocol
The manifestation of any symptom that could be associated with alterations in blood glucose and side effects of intranasal insulin. Fewer symptoms would indicate a better outcome. The most cited symptom was having a runny nose.
Approximately 1 hour following the dose of intranasal insulin (~32 minutes following the end of the passive control/exercise condition; immediately following the completion of the post-test cognitive assessments)
Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - RT
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size for Change in Behavioral Index of Inhibitory Control - Accuracy
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a flanker test of inhibitory control. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - Inhibition Task
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - Inhibition Task
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the flanker test of inhibitory control. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - RT
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (RT) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more negative effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Behavioral Index of Sustained Attention - Accuracy
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in behavioral metrics of performance (response accuracy) on a Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. A more positive effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Engagement - RVIP Task
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b amplitude) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A larger effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Effect Size of Change in Neuroelectric Index of Attentional Processing Speed - RVIP Task
The effect size of the change from pre-to-posttest in neuroelectric measures of attention (P3b latency) in response to the target trial of the Rapid Visual Information Processing test of sustained attention. The effect size was collapsed across a nine-channel region-of-interest centering around the topographic maxima of the P3 (i.e., the CP3/Z/4, P3/Z/4, PO5/Z/6 electrodes). A smaller effect size would indicate a better outcome. Effect sizes were computed for each participant as the standardized change relative to the pretest assessment using the within-subject (drm) variance correction for Cohen's d (Lakens, 2013). To ensure the integrity of the effect size estimates, within-subject effect sizes exceeding 3 times the interquartile range were identified as outliers and removed from analysis. Effect sizes are computed per Arm and do not reflect comparisons or combinations across Arms/Groups.
Prior to intranasal insulin administration relative to 30 minutes following
Study Arms (2)
Passive Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 minute sedentary control period during which participants watched an emotionally neutral video.
Acute Exercise
EXPERIMENTAL20 minute physical activity period during which participants exercised on a treadmill at an intensity corresponding to 60-65% of maximum heart rate while watching an emotionally neutral video.
Interventions
6 doses of 0.2mL saline solution administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
5 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 1 dose of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (20 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
4 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 2 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (40 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
3 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 3 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (60 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
2 doses of 0.2mL saline solution, 4 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (80 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
1 dose of 0.2mL saline solution, 5 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (100 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
6 doses of 0.2mL NovoLog Insulin aspart (120 IU) administered into the intranasal mucosa using the MAD Nasal Atomizer
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must be over the age of 18..
- Participants must have normal or corrected-to-normal vision in order to complete the cognitive task.
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of consent.
- Presence of any major neurological health issues, brain trauma, or concussion with loss of consciousness assessed through a health history and demographics questionnaire.
- Type I or Type II Diabetes
- Self-reported pregnancy
- Currently has any type of inflammation or blockage of the nasal passageways (i.e. allergies or a cold affecting the sinuses).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Kinesiology
East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gwizdala KL, Ferguson DP, Kovan J, Novak V, Pontifex MB. Placebo controlled phase II clinical trial: Safety and efficacy of combining intranasal insulin & acute exercise. Metab Brain Dis. 2021 Aug;36(6):1289-1303. doi: 10.1007/s11011-021-00727-2. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
PMID: 33856613DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
As the present investigation was a Phase II Clinical Trial, the research design was not sufficiently powered for hypothesis testing. Given the potential risk of combining exercise with intranasal insulin the present investigation utilized a sample of healthy, non-diabetic, fasted college-aged adults to limit the potential for a serious adverse event.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Matthew B. Pontifex
- Organization
- Michigan State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew B Pontifex, Ph.D.
Michigan State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind, placebo controlled trial
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2020
First Posted
March 3, 2020
Study Start
June 15, 2018
Primary Completion
February 20, 2020
Study Completion
February 20, 2020
Last Updated
June 21, 2021
Results First Posted
June 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available following primary publication of the results.
- Access Criteria
- By request
Data sharing will be by request and approval of the Michigan State University Human Research Protections Program with the provision of a data-safety and sharing agreement. No individually identifiable information will be shared.