Changes in Affective Pain Processing in Human Volunteers
Mechanisms of Emotional-motivational Pain Processing in Health and Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
183
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The experience of pain is more than the conscious perception of nociceptive signals. Emotional and motivational aspects accompany pain, leading to its aversiveness and motivation for avoidance. In chronic pain, a negative hedonic shift has been proposed that is characterized by disproportionally increased emotional-motivational compared to sensory-discriminative pain responses. Such a negative hedonic shift is, for example, mirrored in very high comorbidity rates of chronic pain and affective disorders such as depression and anxiety. The aim of this study is to develop methods that allow the differentiation of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain response and to characterize mechanisms of the negative hedonic shift.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 21, 2023
November 1, 2023
3.1 years
January 15, 2020
November 18, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ratio of sensory to emotional pain responses
Ratio of the number of correct responses (%) in a task assessing sensory-discriminative pain responses to number of correct responses (%) in a task assessing emotional-motivational pain responses.
during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (11)
reaction time (RT)
during the procedure
pain threshold
baseline
pain tolerance
baseline
perceived pain intensity
during the procedure
perceived pain unpleasantness
during the procedure
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Substudy 1
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. No arms will perform. In addition, in Substudy 1 an operant learning paradigm will be implemented to dissociate these responses, increasing the sensory-discriminative pain responses compared to emotional-motivational pain responses by contingent monetary reinforcement and vice versa. Primary objectives: 1. To develop psychophysical methods that allow the independent assessment of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses and 2. to show that emotional-motivational and sensory-discriminative pain components can be dissociated Secondary objective: To assess whether fear of pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, and sensation seeking as personality traits can explain variations in how strongly sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses can be dissociated
Substudy 2
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. No arms will perform. In addition, in Substudy 2, responses of chronic pain patients will be compared to those of healthy participants to characterize possible alterations in the patients and operant learning will be operationalized to decrease emotional-motivational pain responses, which are assumed to be already increased in the patients. Primary objective: To demonstrate that in chronic pain patients, emotional-motivational pain responses are increased relative to sensory-discriminative pain responses Secondary objective: To assess whether fear of pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, and sensation seeking as personality traits can explain variations in the present dissociation of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses in chronic pain patients
Substudy 3
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will perform a psychophysical task to assess metacognition in pain perception as an indicator of the cognitive-evaluative pain component. No arms will perform. Primary objective: To assess whether metacognition on pain perception are involved and subjective ratings of perceived pain and how metacognition relates to pain intensity. Secondary objective: To assess whether confidentiality as a personality trait , pain catastrophizing, and skin conductance responses are related to metacognition in pain.
Interventions
All participants perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. In addition, in Substudy 1 an operant learning paradigm will be implement to dissociate these responses, increasing the sensory-discriminative pain responses compared to emotional-motivational pain responses by contingent monetary reinforcement or vice versa. In Substudy 2, responses of chronic pain patients will be compared to those of healthy participants to characterize possible alterations and operant learning will be operationalized to decrease emotional-motivational pain responses, which are assumed to be already increased in the patients.
In Substudy 3 participants will perform a psychophysical task to assess metacognition in pain perception as an indicator of the cognitive-evaluative pain component.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- good overall health status
- sufficient knowledge of German or English to follow instructions
- ability to give written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- pain longer than \>3 consecutive days and on more than 30 days within the last 12 months
- major psychiatric or neurological disorders, and substance abuse
- consumption of alcohol, illegal drugs, and analgesic drug within 24 hours before testing
- For chronic pain patients
- unspecific musculoskeletal chronic pain
- sufficient knowledge of German or English to follow instructions
- ability to give written informed consent
- major psychiatric or neurological disorders, excluding depression and anxiety, and substance abuse
- consumption of alcohol, illegal drugs, and analgesic drugs within 24 hours before testing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- susanne beckerlead
- SNSFcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Balgrist Campus
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Susanne Becker, PD Dr.
Balgrist Universitätsklinik
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- participants are not fully instructed about the purpose before and during the test but will be debriefed after testing
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Research Group
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 15, 2020
First Posted
February 21, 2020
Study Start
September 21, 2020
Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Study Completion
November 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share