NCT04280796

Brief Summary

The experience of pain is more than the conscious perception of nociceptive signals. Emotional and motivational aspects accompany pain, leading to its aversiveness and motivation for avoidance. In chronic pain, a negative hedonic shift has been proposed that is characterized by disproportionally increased emotional-motivational compared to sensory-discriminative pain responses. Such a negative hedonic shift is, for example, mirrored in very high comorbidity rates of chronic pain and affective disorders such as depression and anxiety. The aim of this study is to develop methods that allow the differentiation of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain response and to characterize mechanisms of the negative hedonic shift.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
183

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 21, 2020

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

January 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 18, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

acute painchronic painlow back painhedonic shiftemotional-motivation components of painsensory-discriminative components of painoperant conditioningmetacognition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ratio of sensory to emotional pain responses

    Ratio of the number of correct responses (%) in a task assessing sensory-discriminative pain responses to number of correct responses (%) in a task assessing emotional-motivational pain responses.

    during the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • reaction time (RT)

    during the procedure

  • pain threshold

    baseline

  • pain tolerance

    baseline

  • perceived pain intensity

    during the procedure

  • perceived pain unpleasantness

    during the procedure

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Substudy 1

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. No arms will perform. In addition, in Substudy 1 an operant learning paradigm will be implemented to dissociate these responses, increasing the sensory-discriminative pain responses compared to emotional-motivational pain responses by contingent monetary reinforcement and vice versa. Primary objectives: 1. To develop psychophysical methods that allow the independent assessment of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses and 2. to show that emotional-motivational and sensory-discriminative pain components can be dissociated Secondary objective: To assess whether fear of pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, and sensation seeking as personality traits can explain variations in how strongly sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses can be dissociated

Behavioral: psychophysical tasks

Substudy 2

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. No arms will perform. In addition, in Substudy 2, responses of chronic pain patients will be compared to those of healthy participants to characterize possible alterations in the patients and operant learning will be operationalized to decrease emotional-motivational pain responses, which are assumed to be already increased in the patients. Primary objective: To demonstrate that in chronic pain patients, emotional-motivational pain responses are increased relative to sensory-discriminative pain responses Secondary objective: To assess whether fear of pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain catastrophizing, and sensation seeking as personality traits can explain variations in the present dissociation of sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses in chronic pain patients

Behavioral: psychophysical tasks

Substudy 3

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will perform a psychophysical task to assess metacognition in pain perception as an indicator of the cognitive-evaluative pain component. No arms will perform. Primary objective: To assess whether metacognition on pain perception are involved and subjective ratings of perceived pain and how metacognition relates to pain intensity. Secondary objective: To assess whether confidentiality as a personality trait , pain catastrophizing, and skin conductance responses are related to metacognition in pain.

Behavioral: cognitive task

Interventions

All participants perform two psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative and emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. In addition, in Substudy 1 an operant learning paradigm will be implement to dissociate these responses, increasing the sensory-discriminative pain responses compared to emotional-motivational pain responses by contingent monetary reinforcement or vice versa. In Substudy 2, responses of chronic pain patients will be compared to those of healthy participants to characterize possible alterations and operant learning will be operationalized to decrease emotional-motivational pain responses, which are assumed to be already increased in the patients.

Substudy 1Substudy 2
cognitive taskBEHAVIORAL

In Substudy 3 participants will perform a psychophysical task to assess metacognition in pain perception as an indicator of the cognitive-evaluative pain component.

Substudy 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • good overall health status
  • sufficient knowledge of German or English to follow instructions
  • ability to give written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • pain longer than \>3 consecutive days and on more than 30 days within the last 12 months
  • major psychiatric or neurological disorders, and substance abuse
  • consumption of alcohol, illegal drugs, and analgesic drug within 24 hours before testing
  • For chronic pain patients
  • unspecific musculoskeletal chronic pain
  • sufficient knowledge of German or English to follow instructions
  • ability to give written informed consent
  • major psychiatric or neurological disorders, excluding depression and anxiety, and substance abuse
  • consumption of alcohol, illegal drugs, and analgesic drugs within 24 hours before testing

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Balgrist Campus

Zurich, 8008, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute PainChronic PainLow Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBack Pain

Study Officials

  • Susanne Becker, PD Dr.

    Balgrist Universitätsklinik

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
participants are not fully instructed about the purpose before and during the test but will be debriefed after testing
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Study comprises an intervention that is neither a therapeutic or transplant product nor a transplant. Study involves minimal risks for participants. Used methods are within the range of standard methods frequently used in pain research. All participants will perform 2 psychophysical tasks to assess sensory-discriminative \& emotional-motivational pain responses independently from each other. Substudy1: An operant learning paradigm will be implemented to dissociate these responses, increasing the sensory-discriminative compared to emotional-motivational pain responses by contingent monetary reinforcement \& vice versa. Substudy2: Responses of chronic pain patients will be compared to those of healthy participants to characterize possible alterations. Operant learning will be operationalized to decrease emotional-motivational pain responses, which are assumed to be increased in patients. Substudy3: Participants will perform a psychophysical task to assess metacognition in pain perception.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Research Group

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2020

First Posted

February 21, 2020

Study Start

September 21, 2020

Primary Completion

November 1, 2023

Study Completion

November 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations