Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Inguinal hernias are one of the most common diseases in general surgery practice. In a multicenter study conducted in Germany, inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations. Until the last 20 years, after Lichtenstein described tension-free mesh hernia repair, this method was the gold standard in inguinal hernia surgery. This method was advantageous in terms of both less recurrence and less postoperative pain compared to tension methods. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic hernia surgery was first described by Dr. Ger in 1992. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is based on the principles of preperitoneal repair described by Stoppa in open surgery. Its advantages over laparoscopic surgery are; Less post-operative pain, rapid recovery, reduction in nerve damage and chronic pain, and reduced recurrence rate. However, the disadvantage is that the learning curve is longer and higher cost. Two commonly used laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgeries are Trans Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) methods. Although both are preperitoneal repair methods, less intraperitoneal organ damage, less intra-abdominal adhesion formation, and no need for peritoneal sheath repair are the advantages of the TEP method. For this reason, TEP method has been the preferred method today. Various methods have been tried in order not to change the location of the mesh placed in the TEP method. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia is one of the most debated issues. The most common methods for fixation are tacker, tissue adhesive, or suturing the mesh. However, fixing the mesh using a tacker can cause chronic pain. Tissue adhesives are not preferred because tissue adhesives have high costs and sometimes cause allergic reactions. The method in which the mesh is sewn to the pubic bone is avoided by surgeons because it prolongs the operation time. To avoid chronic pain after surgery, the idea was not to fix the mesh. The major drawback of this method is that the mesh may slip and cause recurrence.This study aimed to reveal the difference between the amount of migration and the amount of post-operative pain between detecting the mesh and not detecting it
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2021
CompletedDecember 10, 2021
December 1, 2021
1.1 years
September 29, 2021
December 6, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
displacement of the mesh one day after surgery
It is the process of measuring how much the mesh placed in the surgery is displaced. Determining the distance of the titanium clips placed at the four corners of the mesh to the symphysis pubis and measuring the change in time intervals. Abdominal radiographs of the patients in both study arms will be taken one day after the operation, and the distance between the symphysis pubis and the titanium clips placed on the mesh will be recorded in millimeters.
one day after surgery
displacement of the mesh one week after surgery
It is the process of measuring how much the mesh placed in the surgery is displaced. Determining the distance of the titanium clips placed at the four corners of the mesh to the symphysis pubis and measuring the change in time intervals. Abdominal radiographs of the patients in both study arms will be taken one week after the operation, and the distance between the symphysis pubis and the titanium clips placed on the mesh will be recorded in millimeters.
first week after surgery and 6th month after surgery
displacement of the mesh six month after surgery
It is the process of measuring how much the mesh placed in the surgery is displaced. Determining the distance of the titanium clips placed at the four corners of the mesh to the symphysis pubis and measuring the change in time intervals. Abdominal radiographs of the patients in both study arms will be taken 6 months after the operation, and the distance between the symphysis pubis and the titanium clips placed on the mesh will be recorded in millimeters.
first week after surgery and 6th month after surgery
Postoperative 24th hours pain
Patients will be asked about their visual pain score at the postoperative 24th hour. In this scoring system, 0 represents the least pain and 10 represents the most pain. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) :min 0 max:10 (0 is better)
24th hours after surgery
Postoperative 6th months pain
Patients will be asked about their visual pain score at 6 months postoperatively. In this scoring system, 0 represents the least pain and 10 represents the most pain. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) :min 0 max:10 (0 is better)
6th month after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Fixation
NO INTERVENTIONTotal extra peritoneal repair will be performed in this arm for the patients due to unilateral inguinal hernia. The 15x12 cm mesh will be marked with titanium clips from its 4 corners and placed in the hernia area. The mesh will be fixed to the hernia area by the non-absorbable tacker.This method is the method used routinely in the treatment of laparoscopic hernia today.
Non-Fixation
EXPERIMENTALTotal extra peritoneal repair will be performed in this arm for the patients due to unilateral inguinal hernia. The 15x12 cm mesh will be marked with titanium clips from its 4 corners and placed in the hernia area. The mesh will not be detected in any way.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being over 18 years old
- having a unilateral inguinal hernia
You may not qualify if:
- being under18 years old
- having comorbidity that prevents him from receiving general anesthesia
- having undergone previous lower abdominal surgery
- having previous surgery for inguinal hernia
- having bilateral inguinal hernia, scrotal hernia or strangulated hernia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hitit Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Hitit University
Çorum, 19030, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Buyukasik K, Ari A, Akce B, Tatar C, Segmen O, Bektas H. Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):543-548. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1590-2. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
PMID: 28214943RESULTDarwish A. A, Hegab A. A . Tack fixation versus nonfixation of mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitonaeal hernia repair. Egyptian Journal of Surgery. 2016;35(4): 327-331. DOI: 10.4103/1110-1121.194729
RESULTYildirim MB, Sahiner IT. The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study. Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02587-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
PMID: 35286511DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Murat B YILDIRIM
Hitit University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Only the practicing surgeon will know which group the patients will be in until the end of the study. will not share this information with researchers and patients.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 29, 2021
First Posted
December 10, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
August 31, 2021
Last Updated
December 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share