Developing an Objective Measure of Experienced Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
330
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is a public health challenge around the world. However, there is no single standardized measure of pain, to the point that the estimated prevalence of chronic pain in adults ranges between 2% and 64% depending on the methods and definitions used. Existing measures of pain are known to present several problems and results can be hardly compared between people. The investigators propose and empirically validate a new, simple method to measure experienced pain in clinical trials. The method provides an objective, cardinal measurement of experienced pain which is comparable between people and the investigators test whether it is better able to measure experienced pain than existing procedures. The investigators test the new method in healthy participants using standard protocols (electrical and heat stimuli). The investigators also aim to validate the measure using a causal manipulation which relies on the administration of a topical analgesic product compared to a placebo.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 26, 2022
CompletedOctober 12, 2022
October 1, 2022
4 months
May 30, 2022
October 10, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Choices between monetary amounts and painful stimuli
Participants' choices between monetary amounts and painful stimuli
baseline
self-reported pain ratings according to Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
self-reported pain ratings according to Numerical Rating Scale
baseline
self-reported pain ratings according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
self-reported pain ratings according to Visual Analogue Scale
baseline
self-reported pain ratings according to general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS)
self-reported pain ratings according to general Labeled Magnitude Scale
baseline
response times
Response times relative to participants' choices between monetary amounts and painful stimuli
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
heart rate variability
baseline
skin conductance
baseline
pupil dilation
baseline
Study Arms (7)
Study 1 Low-Intensity Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group which receives less intense electrical stimuli than the other.
Study 1 High-Intensity Group
EXPERIMENTALGroup which receives more intense electrical stimuli than the other.
Study 2 Low-Intensity Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group which receives less intense heat stimuli than the other.
Study 2 High-Intensity Group
EXPERIMENTALGroup which receives more intense heat stimuli than the other.
Study 3 Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORA group that receives a placebo cream.
Study 3 Painkiller group
EXPERIMENTALA group that receives a topical analgesic such as EMLA cream.
Study 4 test-retest reliability group
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants who participated in either Study 1 or 2 are recruited. They will experience both electrical and heat stimuli.
Interventions
At the beginning of each study, participants are randomly allocated into one of two groups. Within each group all participants are exposed to the same painful stimulus. One group experiences a painful stimulus of higher intensity compared to that of the other group. The painful stimuli are physically identical for every subject within the same group and within the standard of previous pain research. Participants are then asked to evaluate the painful stimulus they just received according to a self-reported scale (NRS, VAS, gLMS, NRS-MB). Participants are also asked to decide multiple times whether they prefer a larger amount of money and experience the same or more painful stimulus they received before or a smaller amount of money and no (or a less) painful stimulus. The smaller amount of money is progressively increased across choices until it matches the larger amount, similar to multiple price-list methods (MPL) which are standard in economics.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-60 years.
- ability and willingness to participate in the study
- declaration of consent
- good English language skills (to ensure understanding of all instructions and the declaration of consent).
You may not qualify if:
- inability to give the declaration of consent (e.g. due to linguistic difficulties understanding the study information)
- any neurological disorders
- reduced general health / chronic diseases (e.g. autoimmune disease, severe cardiovascular diseases, insulin-dependent diabetes, severe depression); chronic pain disorders
- pregnancy
- in the week before the experimental session self-reported intake of drugs which could influence pain perception (e.g. cannabis and ADHD medications).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Zurichlead
- Balgrist University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
SNS Laboratory
Zurich, CH, 8091, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2022
First Posted
June 13, 2022
Study Start
June 6, 2022
Primary Completion
September 26, 2022
Study Completion
September 26, 2022
Last Updated
October 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10