NCT04275128

Brief Summary

This prospective observational study seeks to compare pain relief and disability following cooled radiofrequency ablation (Coolief) versus conventional genicular nerve ablation in patients with chronic knee pain. Patients' NRS for pain, WOMAC, and ODI score at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment will be used to evaluate whether Coolief is more effective at reducing disability and improving pain relief.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 17, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 19, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 11, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 24, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

February 17, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

genicular ablationcooled radiofrequencychronic knee paincooled RFradiofrequency ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score

    This is a validated scale which consists of a rating of pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Score reported will be a number, and therefore a value between 0 to 10, with 0 meaning no pain to 10 meaning maximum pain (Krebs et al, 2007).

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee pain score

    6 months

  • Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    6 months

  • Opioid dose after treatment

    1 day

Study Arms (2)

Conventional Genicular Ablation

This group is scheduled to receive conventional genicular ablation to treat their chronic knee pain.

Device: Conventional radiofrequency ablation

Cooled radiofrequency Ablation

This group is scheduled to receive cooled radiofrequency ablation to treat their chronic knee pain.

Device: Cooled radiofrequency ablation

Interventions

Cooled radiofrequency thermal treatment uses the electrical current produced by radio waves to destroy a part of nerve tissue and relieve pain.

Also known as: Cooled radiofrequency thermal treatment
Cooled radiofrequency Ablation

Genicular nerve ablation involves using radiofrequency to heat up the genicular nerve until it dies, causing relief of pain. This is a minimally invasive treatment that does not require any medication.

Also known as: Genicular ablation, Genicular nerve ablation
Conventional Genicular Ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients diagnosed with chronic knee osteoarthritis or post-knee surgical pain, being treated with either cooled radiofrequency ablation at any of the five study locations (HFH Main and HFMC- Ford Rd, HFMC- Columbus, HFMC-Pierson, HFH West Bloomfield) between February 2020 and December 2021.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult male or female (above age of 18)
  • Diagnosed with chronic knee osteoarthritis or post Total Knee Arthroscopy or post Total Knee Replacement Pain
  • More than 3 months of knee pain
  • Scheduled for Genicular Knee ablation (Cooled or conventional ablation)
  • Had previous intra articular injection (steroids or Hyaluronic acids) if not a post-surgical knee pain patient
  • Achieved minimum 50% relief from genicular block x 2
  • Numeric Rating Scale Score of 4 or greater
  • Kellgren-Lawrence Knee Osteoarthritis Grade 2 or greater (in non post-surgical patients)

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant adult female
  • Patient fully anticoagulated
  • Antiplatelet Use
  • History of Clotting Disorder
  • Refusal to participate
  • Focal neurologic deficits
  • Cognitive deficits
  • History of Bone Cancer
  • Mental Health Illness which causes instability
  • Previous Knee radiofrequency ablation
  • Active Infection
  • Allergy to Medications Administered

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Kapural L, Mekhail N. Radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain control. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001 Dec;5(6):517-25. doi: 10.1007/s11916-001-0069-z.

    PMID: 11676886BACKGROUND
  • Lorentzen T. A cooled needle electrode for radiofrequency tissue ablation: thermodynamic aspects of improved performance compared with conventional needle design. Acad Radiol. 1996 Jul;3(7):556-63. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80219-4.

    PMID: 8796717BACKGROUND
  • Menzies RD, Hawkins JK. Analgesia and Improved Performance in a Patient Treated by Cooled Radiofrequency for Pain and Dysfunction Postbilateral Total Knee Replacement. Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):E54-8. doi: 10.1111/papr.12292. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

    PMID: 25857719BACKGROUND
  • McCormick ZL, Korn M, Reddy R, Marcolina A, Dayanim D, Mattie R, Cushman D, Bhave M, McCarthy RJ, Khan D, Nagpal G, Walega DR. Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves for Chronic Pain due to Knee Osteoarthritis: Six-Month Outcomes. Pain Med. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):1631-1641. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx069.

    PMID: 28431129BACKGROUND
  • Davis T, Loudermilk E, DePalma M, Hunter C, Lindley D, Patel N, Choi D, Soloman M, Gupta A, Desai M, Buvanendran A, Kapural L. Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation With Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Jan;43(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000690.

    PMID: 29095245BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Rohit Aiyer, MD

    Henry Ford Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Staff Pain Medicine Physician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2020

First Posted

February 19, 2020

Study Start

July 11, 2020

Primary Completion

September 24, 2020

Study Completion

September 24, 2020

Last Updated

September 28, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations