NCT04266834

Brief Summary

This study will collect high-quality randomized controlled data across the U.S. from practicing cardiologists performing invasive/interventional procedures and determine how they currently manage patients at risk for CIN and how the results of Hikari's L-FABP test change clinical decision making.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
157

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2020

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2020

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 7, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • CPV-measured pre-/post-difference in quality scores between intervention and control physicians

    All physicians' completed simulated CPV cases are scored based upon the quality of care provided. This measure CPV-measured pre-/post-difference in these care quality scores between control physicians using standard of care diagnostic tools and intervention physicians with access to L-FABP test results, including by use case types.

    2-4 weeks

  • CPV-measured cost difference

    Difference in expected cost of care between control and intervention physicians. (Cost will be calculated by measuring differential rates of medical interventions/levels of care selected by each arm, including by each use case, and multiplying by Medicare reimbursement rates for these interventions/levels of care, and/or by modeling the incidence of complications and calculating associated costs per above.)

    2-4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Baseline variation in CPV-measured quality scores

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

Experimental

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental-arm providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:

Other: Experimental Arm

Control

NO INTERVENTION

These providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.

Interventions

First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck and one-page fact sheet) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Hikari DX L-FABP test. Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the L-FABP test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.

Experimental

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Board-certified in cardiology for at least two years
  • Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
  • Averaging at least one day per month performing invasive or interventional cardiology procedures over the last six months
  • English speaking
  • Access to the internet
  • Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to access the internet
  • Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

QURE Healthcare

San Francisco, California, 94133, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, Kropp R, Guerriere R, Paculdo D, Peabody JW. Engaging Primary Care Providers to Reduce Unwanted Clinical Variation and Support ACO Cost and Quality Goals: A Unique Provider-Payer Collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):321-329. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

    PMID: 30328782BACKGROUND
  • Peabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.

    PMID: 23667587BACKGROUND
  • Solon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

    PMID: 19224955BACKGROUND
  • Peabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 28036350BACKGROUND
  • Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):771-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008.

    PMID: 15545677BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • John Peabody, MD, PhD

    President, QURE Healthcare

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study will enroll practicing cardiologists in the US. All eligible and consented participants will be randomly assigned to either a control or intervention arm. All participants complete two rounds of three patient simulations. The intervention arm only will receive educational material about the Hikari L-FABP test in between these two rounds, and be provided simulated L-FABP test results in the second round of the simulated cases.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2020

First Posted

February 12, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion

June 1, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

September 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations