Measuring Practice Pattern Changes and Clinical Utility of a Novel Test for Preeclampsia
1 other identifier
interventional
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will collect high-quality data on how practicing obstetricians across the U.S. currently manage patients showing signs and/or symptoms of preeclampsia and how the results of Progenity's test change clinical decision making. To do so, this study leverages simulated patient cases called Clinical Performance and Value vignettes (CPVs) in a proven methodology to rapidly measure physician care decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 23, 2019
CompletedFebruary 10, 2020
February 1, 2020
1 month
November 15, 2019
February 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
CPV-measured cost difference
Difference in cost of suspected PE-related care between control and intervention physicians. (Cost is calculated by measuring differential rates of medical interventions/levels of care selected by each arm on their CPVs, and multiplying by Medicare reimbursement rates for these interventions/levels of care.)
One week
CPV-measured clinical score difference
Difference in the overall, and the diagnostic and treatment quality scores between control and intervention physicians. Diagnostic and treatment scores are calculated as the percent correct on CPVs, and the overall score is a average score of the subcategory scores (percent correct).
One week
Secondary Outcomes (3)
CPV-measured cost differences by use case
One week
CPV-measured clinical score differences by use case
One week
CPV-calculated baseline variation
One week
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALExperimental-arm providers will complete four simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThese providers will complete four simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.
Interventions
* First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Progenity technology. * Second, within each of their four cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Progenity PE test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Board-certified in obstetrics/gynecology
- Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical duties over the last six months
- English speaking
- Access to the internet
- Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Not board certified in obstetrics/gynecology at least 2 years prior
- Averaging less than 20 hours per week of clinical duties over the last six months
- Non-English speaking
- Unable to access the internet
- Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Qure Healthcare, LLClead
- Progenity, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
QURE Healthcare
San Francisco, California, 94109, United States
Related Publications (4)
Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Jain S, Hansen J, Spell M, Lee M. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Nov 16;141(10):771-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008.
PMID: 15545677BACKGROUNDPeabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.
PMID: 23667587BACKGROUNDPeabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28036350BACKGROUNDSolon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
PMID: 19224955BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John Peabody, MD PhD
President, QURE Healthcare
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2019
First Posted
December 18, 2019
Study Start
November 22, 2019
Primary Completion
December 23, 2019
Study Completion
December 23, 2019
Last Updated
February 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD will be shared.