Ultrasound Guided Retrolaminar Block for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regional analgesia for inguinal hernia repair in children has attracted increasing interest and different techniques like Caudal block, lumbar epidural block, wound infiltration, Ilio-inguinal nerve block and paravertebral block have been used with varying success. Ilio-inguinal nerve blockade has been widely used in this context but the duration of the block is also limited to the early postoperative period. Paravertebral blockade has been shown to produce long lasting postoperative analgesia when used in combination with general anaesthesia in paediatric herniorrhaphy . Ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block is one of the newer and technically simpler alternatives to the traditional PV block . The aim of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided retrolaminar block(RLB) as an analgesic technique in surgery of pediatric inguinal hernia in comparison with with ilioinguinal nerve block(INB). It is hypothesized that RLB block will provide longer duration of postoperative analgesia than INB with few side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 17, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2020
CompletedMay 19, 2020
May 1, 2020
5 months
February 10, 2020
May 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First analgesic request
The time of the first analgesic request will be recorded.
[Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure]
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Improvement in pain score
[Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure]
Levels of parental satisfaction after surgery
.[Time Frame: Up to 24hours after the procedure]
Incidence of adverse effects
[Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure]
Changes in heart rate
[Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure]
Changes in systolic blood pressure
[Time Frame: Up to 24 hours after the procedure]
Study Arms (2)
Retrolamianar block (RLB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anaesthesia will be induced.Ultrasound-guided RLB will be performed under strict aseptic precautions with patient in the lateral position.The anesthetic solution will be injected.
Ilioinguinal nerve block (INB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORGeneral anaesthesia will be induced. Ultrasound-guided INB will be performed under strict aseptic precautions with patient in the supine position.The anesthetic solution will be injected.
Interventions
General anaesthesia will be induced with 8% sevoflurane in oxygen and maintained with 1 MAC sevoflurane via a laryngeal mask.
The suggested ultrasound transducer orientation is sagittal paramedian (cephalacaudad direction). We begin our ultrasound scanning in a paramedian sagittal plane by finding desired level (T12- L1).The transverse process view, the costotransverse ligament can be visualized above the paravertebral space. Continuing to scan from lateral to medial, the vertebral laminae come into view.
A high-frequency probe is placed medial to the anterior superior iliac spine with the axis facing the umbilicus. A needle is inserted toward the ilioinguinal nerve as it runs between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique.
0.3 ml.kg of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected under visualization.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status: 1 or 2 .
- Unilateral inguinal hernia
You may not qualify if:
- spinal abnormality
- bilateral inguinal hernia repair
- Bleeding or coagulation diathesis.
- History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics.
- Parental refusal of consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura university children hospital
Al Mansurah, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahmoud M Alseoudy, MD
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)The study subjects and the resident assessing the outcomes will be blinded to the study group. A single investigator will assess the patients for eligibility, obtain written informed consent, open the sealed opaque envelopes containing group allocation, perform the block, and administer bupivacaine solution.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of anesthesia, ICU & pain management; Faculty of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2020
First Posted
February 12, 2020
Study Start
May 17, 2020
Primary Completion
October 15, 2020
Study Completion
November 20, 2020
Last Updated
May 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share