NCT03193723

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate success, efficacy, feasibility and safety of a simple five step ultrasound guided local anesthetic infiltration technique for unilateral open inguinal hernia repair and to determine the non-inferiority of the block to spinal anesthesia by comparing intraoperative and postoperative complications, pain control and patient and surgeon satisfaction of the block with spinal anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

HerniaLocal anesthesiaultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • NRS 4 hours postoperative

    Numerical Rating pain score 4 hours postoperative

    4 hours

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • NRS 30 minutes postoperative

    30 minutes

  • NRS 12 hours postoperative

    12 hours

  • Time of first rescue analgesic dose

    12 hours

  • Total analgesic dose in the first 12 hours postoperative

    12 hours

  • Incidence of Side effects

    12 hours

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

US guided five step field block will be performed

Procedure: US guided five step field block

Group B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Spinal anesthesia will be administered in sitting position

Procedure: Spinal anesthesia

Interventions

Ultrasound will guide needle insertion in the following layers (except intradermic injection): * Subdermic infiltration. Approximately 8 milliliters * Intradermic injection (making of the skin wheal). of approximately 6 milliliters. * Deep subcutaneous injection. 8 milliliters of the mixture will be injected deep into the subcutaneous adipose * Subfascial infiltration. Approximately eight milliliters of the anesthetic mixture will be injected immediately underneath the aponeurosis of the external oblique. * Pubic tubercle and hernia sac injection. Occasionally, infiltration of ten milliliters of the mixture at the level of the pubic tubercle, around the neck and inside the indirect hernia sac

Group A

Spinal anesthesia will be administered in sitting position, with 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle in L3-L4 intervertebral space, under all aseptic precautions and local infiltration, with 3.0 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (heavy) after ensuring free, clear and adequate flow of cerebrospinal fluid. After giving spinal anesthesia, patient will be made to lie supine.

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA score I, II or Ш.
  • Patients with unilateral inguinal hernia for elective open mesh repair hernioplasty operation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Bilateral, recurrent or complicated inguinal hernia.
  • Emergency operations or operation that lasts more than two hours.
  • Patients with drug or alcohol abuse history.
  • Chronic pain, with daily use of analgesics.
  • Contraindication to local anesthesia.
  • Contraindication of spinal anesthesia.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of medicine, Cairo University teaching hospitals (Kasr Alainy)

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Anand A, Sinha PA, Kittappa K, Mulchandani MH, Debrah S, Brookstein R. Review of Inguinal Hernia Repairs by Various Surgical Techniques in a District General Hospital in the UK. Indian J Surg. 2011 Jan;73(1):13-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0156-7. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

    PMID: 22211031BACKGROUND
  • Santos Gde C, Braga GM, Queiroz FL, Navarro TP, Gomez RS. Assessment of postoperative pain and hospital discharge after inguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia: a prospective study. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2011 Sep-Oct;57(5):545-9. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302011000500013. English, Portuguese.

    PMID: 22012289BACKGROUND
  • Flanagan L Jr, Bascom JU. Repair of the groin hernia. Outpatient approach with local anesthesia. Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Apr;64(2):257-67. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)43283-4.

    PMID: 6729669BACKGROUND
  • Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, Phillips F. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):726-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep235. Epub 2009 Aug 22.

    PMID: 19700776BACKGROUND
  • Rozen WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, Barrington MJ, Ivanusic JJ, Taylor GI. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall. Clin Anat. 2008 May;21(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/ca.20621.

    PMID: 18428988BACKGROUND
  • Chanthong P, Abrishami A, Wong J, Herrera F, Chung F. Systematic review of questionnaires measuring patient satisfaction in ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1061-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819db079.

    PMID: 19352161BACKGROUND
  • Prakash D, Heskin L, Doherty S, Galvin R. Local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2017 Feb;15(1):47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

    PMID: 26895656BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, InguinalHernia

Interventions

Anesthesia, Spinal

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Single blinded
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A Randomized Controlled study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer of anesthesia, SICU & Pain Management

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2017

First Posted

June 21, 2017

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

October 4, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations