Synaptic Density and Progression of Parkinson's Disease.
Longitudinal Measurement of Synaptic Density to Monitor Progression of Parkinson's Disease.
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
AIM: To assess synaptic density and to investigate the potential relationship of regional synaptic loss with motor and non-motor symptoms and with disease progression in the human brain in vivo in patients with PD. DESIGN: We will include 30 PD patients and 20 healthy controls. All subjects will undergo a clinical examination, with comprehensive assessment of motor and non-motor symptoms, and imaging evaluation consisting of 11C-UCB-J PET-CT and 18F-FE-PE2I PET-MR at baseline and after 2 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Oct 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2022
CompletedMay 19, 2022
May 1, 2022
3.4 years
January 10, 2020
May 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Baseline differences in synaptic density.
Baseline differences (%) in synaptic density between patients and controls.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.
Correlations between clinical scores and synaptic density.
Correlations between clinical scores and synaptic density in the patient group.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Differences in the rate of decline of synaptic density.
Differences (%) in the rate of decline of synaptic density between patients and controls.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of synaptic density in the patient group.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Baseline differences in DAT levels.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the baseline evaluation.
Correlations between clinical scores and DAT levels.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Differences in the rate of decline of global and DAT levels.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Correlations between progression of the clinical scores and decline of DAT levels.
Data analysis wel be done when all subjects have undergone the 2-year follow-up evaluation.
Study Arms (2)
PD patients
EXPERIMENTALAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Healthy controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORAt baseline and 2-year follow-up
Interventions
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) using the radioligand 11C-UCB-J.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of dopamine transporter (DAT) using the radioligand 18F-FE-PE2I, and brain MRI performed simultaneously.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PD diagnosis based on MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease
- Less than 5 years disease duration since motor symptom onset according to the patient
- Hoehn-Yahr stage 1 or 2 in medication ON state
- Capacity to understand the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Neuropsychiatric diseases other than PD
- Major internal medical diseases
- Relevant abnormalities on MR brain
- History of alcohol or drug abuse
- Contraindications for MR
- Pregnancy
- Previous participation in other research studies involving ionizing radiation with \> 1 mSv over past 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wim Vandenberghe, MD, PhD
UZ Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2020
First Posted
January 28, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion
February 28, 2022
Study Completion
February 28, 2022
Last Updated
May 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Needs to be decided.