Motor Learning and tDCS in Parkinson's Disease
The Effect of Single Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Sequential Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study sought to examine the efficacy of single session transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex in people with Parkinson's disease on sequential motor learning performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedAugust 26, 2021
February 1, 2021
9 months
March 1, 2021
August 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline sequential finger tapping performance
A skill index reflecting the accuracy and speed of which participants perform a specified finger tapping sequence.
Two assessments: Baseline / pre-intervention, and immediately post-intervention
Change from baseline oxygenated haemoglobin response
Task related changes of oxygenated haemoglobin as measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Two assessments: Baseline / pre-intervention, and immediately post-intervention
Change from baseline shape-counting error
The percentage of shape counting error during dual task assessments. Sequential finger tapping + visual shape counting task.
Two assessments: Baseline / pre-intervention, and immediately post-intervention
Study Arms (3)
Anodal tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over C3. Cathodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over the right supraorbital area. 20 minutes of stimulation at 2 mA with a 30-second phase-in and phase-out period.
Cathodal tDCS
ACTIVE COMPARATORCathodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over C3. Anodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over the right supraorbital area. 20 minutes of stimulation at 2 mA with a 30-second phase-in and phase-out period.
Sham tDCS
SHAM COMPARATORAnodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over C3. Cathodal electrode (35 cm2 sponge electrode) placed over the right supraorbital area. Stimulation was phased in for 30 seconds up to 2 mA and then switched off. Stimulation was again phased in for 30 seconds following 20 minutes of no stimulation.
Interventions
Transcranial electrical stimulation device. A weak direct electrical current, up to 2 mA, is passed between two electrodes placed on the scalp. Electrodes are housed in 35 cm2 sponges saturated with 4 ml of saline solution (0.9 % NaCl) per side, per pad. Stimulation is phased in with a 30 second ramp up period prior to the specified stimulation period and phased-out with a ramp down of the current following the specified stimulation period. For sham stimulation, the ramp-up and ramp-down periods are retained, but stimulation is switched off for during the specified stimulation period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Right-handed (Edinburgh Handedness Inventory; ≥50)
- Cognitively capable (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); ≥23)
- Mild to moderate Parkinson's disease severity (Hoehn and Yar disease stage 2-3)
You may not qualify if:
- History of stroke
- Comorbidity
- Cephalic implants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Magaret Mak, Dr
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2021
First Posted
March 8, 2021
Study Start
January 7, 2019
Primary Completion
September 27, 2019
Study Completion
September 27, 2019
Last Updated
August 26, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share