Comparison of Two Resuscitative Thoracotomy Techniques
Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy vs Modified Bilateral Clamshell Thoracotomy Performed by Emergency Physicians
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is a life saving procedure for patients who have suffered cardiac arrest or are at significant risk of cardiac arrest following significant trauma. The procedure is ideally performed by a surgeon, but in some circumstance must be performed by non-surgical specialists such as Emergency Medicine physicians. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the optimal RT technique taught to non-surgical specialists in an educational human cadaver lab. The objective was to compare time to successful completion of two different RT techniques; (1) Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy (LAT) and (2) Modified Clamshell Thoracotomy (MCT). The investigators hypothesized that the non-surgical specialist time to successful completion for the MCT would be shorter than for the LAT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2020
CompletedJanuary 27, 2020
January 1, 2020
4 months
January 19, 2020
January 22, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to successful completion of RT procedure
Time participant took to complete a successful RT procedure. Success includes (1) successful delivery of the heart and (2) successful cross-clamp of the descending thoracic aorta. Success determined by general surgeon observer. Time start from command "go" until participant verbalizes delivery of the heart and cross-clamp of the aorta.
During procedure on data collection date
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Successful delivery of the heart defined as exposure and inspection of all surfaces
During procedure on data collection date
Successful descending thoracic aorta cross-clamp defined as 100% occlusion of the descending aorta with a vascular clamp
During procedure on data collection date
Time to delivery of the heart defined as exposure and inspection of all surfaces
During procedure on data collection date
Time to descending thoracic aorta cross clamp defined as 100% occlusion of the descending aorta with a vascular clamp
During procedure on data collection date
Occurrence of iatrogenic injuries
During procedure on data collection date
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Modified Clamshell Thoracotomy First
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to perform the MCT first, then cross over to the perform the alternate LAT.
Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy First
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to perform the LAT first, then cross over to the perform the alternate MCT.
Interventions
Participants received standardized training on performing a MCT and LAT. Participants then performed the procedures on a fresh human cadaver model.
Participants received standardized training on performing a MCT and LAT. Participants then performed the procedures on a fresh human cadaver model.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- licensed physician
- emergency medicine residency trainee or graduate
- privileged provider at SAMMC
You may not qualify if:
- \- unwilling to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Brooke Army Medical Centerlead
- United States Army Institute of Surgical Researchcollaborator
- United States Air Force En Route Care Research Centercollaborator
- Centre for Emergency Health Sciencescollaborator
- Barts & The London NHS Trustcollaborator
- The Institute of Pre-Hospital Care at London's Air Ambulancecollaborator
- US Air Force 711th Human Performance Wingcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
Related Publications (1)
Newberry R, Brown D, Mitchell T, Maddry JK, Arana AA, Achay J, Rahm S, Long B, Becker T, Grier G, Davies G. Prospective Randomized Trial of Standard Left Anterolateral Thoracotomy Versus Modified Bilateral Clamshell Thoracotomy Performed by Emergency Physicians. Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;77(3):317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
PMID: 32807537DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Emergency Medicine Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2020
First Posted
January 27, 2020
Study Start
November 19, 2018
Primary Completion
March 27, 2019
Study Completion
March 27, 2019
Last Updated
January 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share