NCT03444077

Brief Summary

Early identification of trauma patients in need for Damage Control Resuscitation (DCR) has potential to be beneficial for general emergency units that are not expected to be ready for this rare situation 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. It could also be useful for high performing trauma centers to identify such patients earlier and be able to provide earlier adequate treatment. By contrast, initiation of DCR in patients who do not require this aggressive therapy may negatively affect their survival. An early identification of patients who do not require DCR would probably be beneficial (impact on cost-effectiveness and on patients' survival). The evidence of the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) accuracy has been evaluated in several studies but the potential effect of its use on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated. There has never been any evaluation of the impact of a prehospital discrimination of trauma patients with or without the need for DCR. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on mortality of a prehospital discrimination between trauma patients with or without a potential need for DCR. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the feasibility of such discrimination and its impact on cost-effectiveness. We hypothesize that the information will lead to improved quality of care with reduced mortality and morbidity.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2018

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

February 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Seven days mortality

    Overall mortality

    seven days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Thirty days mortality

    Thirty days

  • Hospital length-of-stay

    Thirty days

  • Blood products transfusion

    Thirty days

Study Arms (2)

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The patients allocated in the control group will be managed as recommended in the local guidelines and protocols. As the trial involves participating centers with different prehospital and hospital realities and local practices, the control group will reflect a wide panel of levels of care and will not be limited to a unique approach.

Diagnostic Test: Regular careOther: Regular Care

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will be classified in two categories regarding their TICCS value. Patients with TICCS ≥ 10 will be classified as in need for DCR; while patients with TICCS \< 10 will be classified as not in need for DCR. TICCS \< 10 This subgroup will be considered without a need for DCR and without coagulopathy. There will not be any activation of the DCR components (no phone contact to the blood bank, to the surgical team, no prehospital transfusion). There will be any prehospital treatment/prevention of the hyperfibrinolysis using Tranexamic acid (TXA). Crystalloids infusion will be allowed. TICCS ≥ 10 This subgroup will be considered with a need for DCR and with coagulopathy. They will be treated using the STTTOPPP the bleeding protocol.

Diagnostic Test: Use of the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) as a diagnostic tool.Other: STTTOPPP the bleeding

Interventions

The TICCS will be calculated on the site of injury for the patients taken in charge in the intervention group. Those patients will be classified in two categories regarding their TICCS value. Patients with TICCS ≥ 10 will be classified as in need for DCR; while patients with TICCS \< 10 will be classified as not in need for DCR.

Intervention group
Regular CareDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients from the control group will be evaluated by clinicians using the local usual clinical Tools.

Control group

* Surgical team pre-activation * Trauma team pre-activation * Transfusion team pre-activation * Tranexamic acid (administration of 1 gram of TXA if documented hyperfibrinolysis) * O negative RBC transfusion as soon as possible * Plasma and Platelets transfusion as soon as possible * Permissive hypotension (restrictive use of crystalloids: no more than 500 milliliters before definitive control of the bleeding is achieved) * Prophylaxis (initiate antithrombotic prophylaxis as soon as the bleeding is under control and coagulation tests are normal, first evaluation before the 24th hour after trauma)

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prehospital intervention of paramedical or medical team involved in the present trial
  • Admission in a hospital involved in this trial

You may not qualify if:

  • Spontaneous admission without prehospital intervention
  • Penetrating trauma

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire St Pierre

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Réseau hospitalier de Jolimont

La Louvière, Belgium

Location

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège

Liège, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and InjuriesHemostatic DisordersHemorrhageEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Vascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Alexandre Ghuysen, MD, PhD

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Martin L Tonglet, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Frederic Swerts, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2018

First Posted

February 23, 2018

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 1, 2020

Last Updated

May 2, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations