NCT04234035

Brief Summary

Although a CT scan is required for some Emergency Department patients with signs and symptoms of a kidney stone, recent evidence has shown that routine scanning is unnecessary and may expose young patients to significant cumulative radiation, increasing their risk of future cancers. Shared Decision-Making may facilitate diagnostic imaging decisions that are more inline with patients' values and preferences. By comparing a shared approach to diagnostic decision-making to a traditional, physician-directed approach, this study lays the foundation for a future randomized trial that will reduce radiation exposure, improve engagement, and improve the quality and patient-centeredness of Emergency Department care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 2, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 11, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2020

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 9, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

December 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Feasibility of study

    Is this study feasible? Investigators will record number of patients enrolled. An enrollment of at least three patients per month will indicate feasibility.

    Up to 12 months

  • Fidelity

    Does the DA do what we think it is doing? Fidelity will be examined after 50 patients are enrolled: conversations between patients and clinicians will be scored for whether shared decision-making occurred. If SDM is NOT occurring in the intervention group (\>75% of interactions) or IS occurring in the usual care group (\>50% of interactions), fidelity will not be considered met.

    Up to 12 months

  • Patient Knowledge

    We hypothesize that the intervention group will have increased knowledge regarding radiation exposure and diagnostic options. This will be tested with a 10 question Knowledge Test developed by stakeholders for this study and delivered at the end of the index visit. The scores for this test range from 0-10 with 10 indicating higher knowledge (more correct answers)

    Measured at the end of the index visit. (Day 0)

  • CT scan rate

    We hypothesize that SDM will lead to a change in CT scans performed at the index visits and in the first 60 days

    Day 0 and Day 60 (Day 60 evaluation will include all days from 0-60)

  • Radiation exposure

    We hypothesize that SDM will lead to a change in exposure to radiation. We will record radiation exposure for each CT done between day 0 and day 60, as indicated by DLP on CT reports.

    Day 0 and Day 60 (Day 60 evaluation will include all days from 0-60)

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    Day 0, end of visit

  • Patient engagement

    Day 0, end of visit

  • Patient engagement

    Day 0, end of visit

  • Patient engagement

    Day 0, end of visit

  • Occurrence of SDM

    Day 0, end of visit

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Shared Decision-Making (via Decision Aid)

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention is a decision aid, which both encourages and facilitates a shared decision-making conversation between the clinician and the patient. The decision aid educates patients regarding evidence-based approaches to the management of suspected kidney stones in the ED. Clinicians will receive training specific to this decision aid, though the decision aid is designed to be used with no additional training.

Behavioral: Decision AidOther: Standardized Educational Material (informational pamphlet)

standardized educational intervention (pamphlet +usual care)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The control arm will receive Usual Care and a standardized educational intervention (pamphlet). This intervention (pamphlet) contains information about kidney stones. Usual care for this clinical scenario generally involves the clinician choosing the management plan. Clinicians of subjects assigned to the usual care group will be asked to practice usual, evidence-based medical care, without shared decision-making.

Other: Standardized Educational Material (informational pamphlet)

Interventions

Decision AidBEHAVIORAL

Decision aid to facilitated shared decision-making

Shared Decision-Making (via Decision Aid)

Pamphlet with information about kidney stones

Shared Decision-Making (via Decision Aid)standardized educational intervention (pamphlet +usual care)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-55,
  • with acute flank pain - for whom clinician believes acute flank pain may be from renal colic
  • who are deemed by the treating clinician to be at low risk for dangerous alternative diagnoses.
  • Clinician is considering imaging patient for kidney stones (any imaging)

You may not qualify if:

  • Recent trauma related to pain (including minor such as lifting/turning)
  • Pregnancy (previous or discovered during ED visit)
  • Recent surgical procedure on abdomen or pelvis (30d)
  • Recent urologic procedure (30d)
  • Recent childbirth (30d)
  • Signs of Systemic Infection: Fever \>100.9 (101 and up), SBP \<90, HR\>120
  • Moderate or severe abdominal tenderness or rebound/guarding, consistently present (present for more than one exam, or present after patient treated with pain medication)
  • Known history of one kidney or other urological/renal abnormality (including neurogenic bladder, ESRD and paraplegia; or if solitary kidney discovered on US)
  • Known malignancy (any) within past year (or received treatment in the past 12 months)
  • Immunocompromised (chronic steroids, HIV, crohns, immunomodulators or severely ill chronically)
  • On anticoagulation
  • Crisis patient (behavioral health)/belligerent
  • Lacks capacity for medical decision-making
  • Unlikely to respond to follow-up calls (IVDA, homeless, no phone)
  • Clinician is concerned for alternative diagnosis requiring CT scan (appendicitis) (\>5% likelihood by clinician gestalt)
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Baystate Medical Center

Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Westafer LM, DiFronzo BM, Visintainer P, Scales CD, Hess EP, Lindenauer PK. Feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid for emergency department patients with suspected ureterolithiasis: protocol for an adaptive randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05140-9.

    PMID: 33691760BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney CalculiEmergenciesCommunication

Interventions

Decision Support Techniques

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NephrolithiasisKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrolithiasisUrinary CalculiMale Urogenital DiseasesCalculiPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Schoenfeld, MD, MS

    University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2019

First Posted

January 21, 2020

Study Start

December 11, 2019

Primary Completion

March 30, 2024

Study Completion

March 30, 2024

Last Updated

July 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no current plan for data sharing. This could change.

Locations