Shared Decision-Making for the Promotion of Patient-Centered Imaging in the ED: Suspected Kidney Stones
ED-KSS
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although a CT scan is required for some Emergency Department patients with signs and symptoms of a kidney stone, recent evidence has shown that routine scanning is unnecessary and may expose young patients to significant cumulative radiation, increasing their risk of future cancers. Shared Decision-Making may facilitate diagnostic imaging decisions that are more inline with patients' values and preferences. By comparing a shared approach to diagnostic decision-making to a traditional, physician-directed approach, this study lays the foundation for a future randomized trial that will reduce radiation exposure, improve engagement, and improve the quality and patient-centeredness of Emergency Department care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2024
CompletedJuly 9, 2024
July 1, 2024
4.3 years
December 2, 2019
July 5, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Feasibility of study
Is this study feasible? Investigators will record number of patients enrolled. An enrollment of at least three patients per month will indicate feasibility.
Up to 12 months
Fidelity
Does the DA do what we think it is doing? Fidelity will be examined after 50 patients are enrolled: conversations between patients and clinicians will be scored for whether shared decision-making occurred. If SDM is NOT occurring in the intervention group (\>75% of interactions) or IS occurring in the usual care group (\>50% of interactions), fidelity will not be considered met.
Up to 12 months
Patient Knowledge
We hypothesize that the intervention group will have increased knowledge regarding radiation exposure and diagnostic options. This will be tested with a 10 question Knowledge Test developed by stakeholders for this study and delivered at the end of the index visit. The scores for this test range from 0-10 with 10 indicating higher knowledge (more correct answers)
Measured at the end of the index visit. (Day 0)
CT scan rate
We hypothesize that SDM will lead to a change in CT scans performed at the index visits and in the first 60 days
Day 0 and Day 60 (Day 60 evaluation will include all days from 0-60)
Radiation exposure
We hypothesize that SDM will lead to a change in exposure to radiation. We will record radiation exposure for each CT done between day 0 and day 60, as indicated by DLP on CT reports.
Day 0 and Day 60 (Day 60 evaluation will include all days from 0-60)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Patient Satisfaction
Day 0, end of visit
Patient engagement
Day 0, end of visit
Patient engagement
Day 0, end of visit
Patient engagement
Day 0, end of visit
Occurrence of SDM
Day 0, end of visit
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Shared Decision-Making (via Decision Aid)
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention is a decision aid, which both encourages and facilitates a shared decision-making conversation between the clinician and the patient. The decision aid educates patients regarding evidence-based approaches to the management of suspected kidney stones in the ED. Clinicians will receive training specific to this decision aid, though the decision aid is designed to be used with no additional training.
standardized educational intervention (pamphlet +usual care)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control arm will receive Usual Care and a standardized educational intervention (pamphlet). This intervention (pamphlet) contains information about kidney stones. Usual care for this clinical scenario generally involves the clinician choosing the management plan. Clinicians of subjects assigned to the usual care group will be asked to practice usual, evidence-based medical care, without shared decision-making.
Interventions
Decision aid to facilitated shared decision-making
Pamphlet with information about kidney stones
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-55,
- with acute flank pain - for whom clinician believes acute flank pain may be from renal colic
- who are deemed by the treating clinician to be at low risk for dangerous alternative diagnoses.
- Clinician is considering imaging patient for kidney stones (any imaging)
You may not qualify if:
- Recent trauma related to pain (including minor such as lifting/turning)
- Pregnancy (previous or discovered during ED visit)
- Recent surgical procedure on abdomen or pelvis (30d)
- Recent urologic procedure (30d)
- Recent childbirth (30d)
- Signs of Systemic Infection: Fever \>100.9 (101 and up), SBP \<90, HR\>120
- Moderate or severe abdominal tenderness or rebound/guarding, consistently present (present for more than one exam, or present after patient treated with pain medication)
- Known history of one kidney or other urological/renal abnormality (including neurogenic bladder, ESRD and paraplegia; or if solitary kidney discovered on US)
- Known malignancy (any) within past year (or received treatment in the past 12 months)
- Immunocompromised (chronic steroids, HIV, crohns, immunomodulators or severely ill chronically)
- On anticoagulation
- Crisis patient (behavioral health)/belligerent
- Lacks capacity for medical decision-making
- Unlikely to respond to follow-up calls (IVDA, homeless, no phone)
- Clinician is concerned for alternative diagnosis requiring CT scan (appendicitis) (\>5% likelihood by clinician gestalt)
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199, United States
Related Publications (1)
Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Westafer LM, DiFronzo BM, Visintainer P, Scales CD, Hess EP, Lindenauer PK. Feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid for emergency department patients with suspected ureterolithiasis: protocol for an adaptive randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05140-9.
PMID: 33691760BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth Schoenfeld, MD, MS
University of Massachusetts Medical School - Baystate
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2019
First Posted
January 21, 2020
Study Start
December 11, 2019
Primary Completion
March 30, 2024
Study Completion
March 30, 2024
Last Updated
July 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no current plan for data sharing. This could change.