AMEND-CRT: Mechanical Dyssynchrony as Selection Criterion for CRT
AMEND-CRT
Assessment of MEchaNical Dyssynchrony as Selection Criterion for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
700
11 countries
24
Brief Summary
Previous experience with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates suggests that selection of these patients can be improved. Current clinical guideline approaches are mainly too unspecific and lead to a high non-responder rate of 30-40%, which causes a burden on health care systems and puts patients at risk of an unnecessary treatment who might benefit more from a conservative approach. Previous work indicated that using the assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography can lower the non-responder rate at least by 50% without compromising sensitivity for detecting amendable patients. The current prospective, randomized, multi-center trial was therefore designed to prove that the characterization of the mechanical properties of the left ventricle can improve patient selection for CRT. Patients will be randomized into one of two study arms: a control study arm with treatment recommendation based on clinical guidelines criteria, or an experimental study arm with treatment recommendation based on the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony. All patients will receive a CRT implantation. In the control study arm, bi-ventricular pacing will be turned on. In the experimental study arm, bi-ventricular pacing will be turned on or off, depending on the presence or absence of mechanical dyssynchrony, respectively. The primary endpoint will be non-inferiority in outcome of a treatment recommendation based on mechanical dyssynchrony, achieved with a lower number of CRT devices implanted, effectively leading to a lower number needed to treat. Outcome measures are the average relative change in continuously measured LVESV per arm and the percentage 'worsened' according to the Packer Clinical Composite Score per arm after 1 year follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 13, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2030
ExpectedDecember 6, 2023
November 1, 2023
5 years
January 8, 2020
November 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Volume response and Packer Clinical Composite Score
Non-inferiority in outcome of a treatment recommendation based on mechanical dyssynchrony, achieved with a lower number of CRT devices implanted, effectively leading to a lower number needed to treat. Outcome measures are the average relative change in left ventricular end-systolic volume and the proportion of patients 'worsened' according to the Packer Clinical Composite Score after 12 months follow-up.
12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Effect on left ventricular function in both arms
12 months follow-up
Difference in quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire score and EuroQol 5D index score in both arms
12 months follow-up
Difference in 6 minute walk test distance in both arms
12 months follow-up
Difference in predictive value for volume response
12 months follow-up
Difference in predictive value for long-term patient outcome in both arms
1 year, 3 years and 5 years follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Treatment recommendation based on guidelines
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment of the patient assigned to this arm will be based on the current guidelines for CRT implantation, as issued by the European Society of Cardiology. All patients will receive CRT implantation, with bi-ventricular pacing ON.
Treatment recommendation based on mechanical dyssynchrony
EXPERIMENTALTreatment of the patients assigned to this arm will be based on the presence of mechanical dyssynchrony. All patients will receive CRT implantation. Bi-ventricular pacing will be either turned ON or OFF, based on respectively the presence or absence of mechanical dyssynchrony.
Interventions
Implantation of a CRT device. Bi-ventricular pacing will be turned ON.
Implantation of a CRT device. Bi-ventricular pacing will be turned OFF.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient has a LVEF ≤ 35%
- Patient has a LVEDD ≥ 2.7cm/m² or LVEDD ≥ 50mm (m) and ≥45mm (f)
- Patient underwent complete revascularization in case of ischemia
- Patients is able to understand and willing to provide a written informed consent
- Patient is 18 years or older
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with the following conditions will be excluded:
- unreliable left ventricular volume measurements
- severe MR or more than moderate other valvular disease
- pulmonary hypertension, other than secondary to left heart disease
- patient on hemodialysis
- life expectancy \< 1 year
- pregnant or breastfeeding
- Patients with prior right ventricular pacing between 20% to 80% will be excluded.
- Patients with prior right ventricular pacing ≤ 20% or no pacemaker / ICD will be excluded if they have any of the following criteria:
- PR duration \> 250ms
- second / third degree atrioventricular block
- intrinsic QRS duration \< 130ms
- atrial fibrillation with resting HR \< 50/min or \> 80/min
- Patients with prior right ventricular pacing ≥ 80% will be excluded if they have any of the following criteria:
- sensed AV delay \> 250ms
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (24)
University Hospital Antwerp
Antwerp, 2000, Belgium
ZNA Middelheim
Antwerp, 2020, Belgium
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge
Bruges, 8000, Belgium
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
AZ Damiaan
Ostend, 8400, Belgium
AZ Delta
Roeselare, 8800, Belgium
Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology
São Paulo, 04012-909, Brazil
CHRU Brest
Brest, 29200, France
Groupements des hôpitaux de l'institut catholique de Lille
Lille, 59800 Lille, France
CHU Rennes - Pontchaillou Hospital
Rennes, 35000, France
St. Vinzenz-Hospital
Cologne, 50733, Germany
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
Rostock, 18057, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080, Germany
Semmelweis University Heart Center
Budapest, 1122, Hungary
Paul Stradins Clinical University hospital
Riga, LV-1002, Latvia
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Poznan, 61-701, Poland
Klinika Wad Wrodzonych Serca
Warsaw, 04-628, Poland
Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
Zabrze, 41-800, Poland
CHU de São João
Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
Heart Institute Nicolae Stancioiu
Cluj-Napoca, 400001, Romania
Hospital Clínico de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036, Spain
Universitätsspital Zürich
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jens-Uwe Voigt, MD, PhD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2020
First Posted
January 13, 2020
Study Start
December 10, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
December 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Available upon reasonable request after acceptance of publications.