Image Supported Lead Placement in CRT
ADVISE
Advanced Image Supported Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
3 other identifiers
interventional
130
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established pacemaker therapy for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure, but is hampered by a non-response rate of 30-40%. Optimising left ventricular (LV) lead placement is the cornerstone of improving treatment. The optimal location for the lead is remote from scar but within segments demonstrating late electromechanical activation. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and clinical effect of the use of real-time guided lead placement using cardiac MRI and fluoroscopy in a blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Feb 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedApril 1, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.6 years
August 27, 2021
March 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in % of patients with succesfull LV lead location
Lead location, defined as being within, adjacent, or remote from the pre-defined target.
Direct post-CRT
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in reverse remodelling and volumetric response
6 months
Change in EQ-5D-5L
6, 12 and 24 months
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
6, 12 and 24 months
Change in CRT response score
12 months
Health Technology Assessment
24 months
Other Outcomes (8)
Difference in total implantation procedure time.
Direct post-CRT
Difference in total fluoroscopy time during procedure.
Direct post-CRT
Difference in total contrast dose used during procedure.
Direct post-CRT
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALLive visualised, fluoroscopy-fused, image-guided, left ventricular lead placement on the basis of avoiding scar and targeting late mechanically activated segments.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONEmpirical standard-of-care left ventricular lead placement, in line with current CRT implantation guidelines with electrical guiding on the basis of Q-LV sense.
Interventions
CARTBox performs analysis of cardiac MRI scans. The result is a treatment file that displays optimal targets for left ventricular lead implantation in CRT. This file will be used as an overlay with live fluoroscopy during the implantation procedure in the intervention group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Heart failure with LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%;
- New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV (ambulatory);
- Optimal medical treatment that is tolerable;
- Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS ≥ 130 ms, OR non-LBBB and QRS ≥ 150 ms.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- Subjects with impaired renal function (severe renal insufficiency, GFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2);
- Atrial fibrillation or atrial fibrillation during MRI
- Documented allergic reaction to gadolinium;
- Impossibility to undergo an MRI scan;
- Participation in another clinical study that prohibits any procedures other than standard.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- UMC Utrechtlead
- CART-Tech B.V.collaborator
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Developmentcollaborator
- Health Hollandcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands
UMC Groningen
Groningen, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC+
Maastricht, Netherlands
St. Antonius Nieuwegein
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, Netherlands
Isala Zwolle
Zwolle, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Wouters PC, van Slochteren FJ, Tuinenburg AE, Doevendans PA, Cramer MM, Delnoy PHM, van Dijk VF, Meine M. On-screen image-guided lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Feasibility and outcome in a multicenter setting. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Oct 18;4(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.10.002. eCollection 2023 Jan.
PMID: 36713038BACKGROUNDWouters PC, van Lieshout C, van Dijk VF, Delnoy PH, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJ, Frederix GW, van Slochteren FJ, Meine M. Advanced image-supported lead placement in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: protocol for the multicentre, randomised controlled ADVISE trial and early economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 25;11(10):e054115. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054115.
PMID: 34697125BACKGROUNDGerrits W, Wouters PC, Chiu CSL, Guglielmo M, Cramer MJ, van der Harst P, Vernooy K, van Stipdonk AMW, van Halm VP, van Dijk VF, Ghani A, Maass AH, Yap SC, van Slochteren FJ, Meine M. Optimizing CRT Lead Placement Accuracy With CMR-Guided On-Screen Targeting: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ADVISE-CRT III). JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;11(6):1293-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.01.022. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
PMID: 40117420BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mathias Meine, MD, PhD
UMC Utrecht
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator (MD, PhD)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2021
First Posted
September 22, 2021
Study Start
February 8, 2021
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Within legal and ethical limits, deidentified individual clinical trial participant-level data (IPD), generated by our research, can be made available. Upon publication, data will be made available upon reasonable request and in agreement with a collaboration agreement. A data sharing and management plan is provided.