Virtual Reality Use for Peri-Procedural Analgesia and Anxiolysis
Evaluating the Efficacy and Feasibility of Virtual Reality Use for Peri-Procedural Analgesia and Anxiolysis: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Currently, most analgesic regimens for painful bedside procedures rely on pharmacologic sedation or high doses of opioids (e.g.: nurse-administered IV opioids, anxiolytics, and sedatives; patient-controlled analgesia; anesthesiologist-administered sedation; and occasionally general anesthesia). Pharmacologic interventions are frequently associated with suboptimal analgesia, opioid-induced side effects, requirement for increased monitoring due to over sedation, and progressive acute tolerance to opioids over time, particularly with multiple/repeat procedures. Alternative, non-pharmacologic strategies may help reduce pain, side-effects and opioid tolerance associated with painful bedside procedures. These strategies have not been studied as extensively, but are becoming more important in view of the current national opioid crisis. In particular, with recent technologic advancements, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a non-pharmacologic modality for analgesia and anxiolysis, which can have tremendous benefits in acute pain management. VR provides an immersive, realistic, often interactive experience for the user. It is frequently described as "transporting" the user to an alternate environment, with the use of high-fidelity head-mounted displays (HMD), noise-cancelling headsets, and a complete audio-visual experience. The user's sense of "presence" in the VR environment is crucial in providing patient engagement, and correlates with non-pharmacologic pain control. VR has been shown to provide non-pharmacologic analgesia in children and adults undergoing painful procedures such as bedside wound care, burn treatment, and physical therapy. The use of VR during painful bedside procedures is one specific setting which offers a good starting point to investigate this technology for acute pain management. Our study wishes to determine if VR plus standard therapy provides superior analgesia for painful bedside procedures (e.g. burn treatment, wound care) compared with standard therapy alone. Our primary outcome is a reduction in pain scores by 30%, as measured by a numerical analog scale (NAS) during painful bedside procedures. The investigators will use a randomized, cross-over study design in which hospitalized patients receiving repeated painful bedside procedures, will be randomized to 2 groups. Group A will have an initial painful bedside procedure under standard treatment only, and a repeat procedure under standard treatment + VR. Group B will have an initial procedure under standard treatment +VR, and a subsequent one under standard treatment. Questionnaires including pain scores and secondary outcomes will be administered to each patient before and after the bedside procedure. A convenience sample of patients will be recruited over 1 year (anticipated N\~30).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2021
CompletedJanuary 9, 2020
January 1, 2020
12 months
January 2, 2020
January 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Analog Scale Pain Score
The primary outcome is a reduction in pain scores by 30%, as measured by a numerical analog scale (NAS) during painful bedside procedures. Minimum scale value 0, maximum 10, higher scores mean more pain, lower scores mean less pain.
During painful bedside procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Anxiety score - State Trait Anxiety Index short form questionnaire
During painful bedside procedure
Quality of life measures - Quality of Recovery 15 questionnaire
During painful bedside procedure
Opioid use during painful bedside procedure
During painful bedside procedure
Number of participants with side effects related to virtual reality use during painful beside procedure (Nausea, dizziness, and other patient-reported adverse events)
During painful bedside procedure
Study Arms (2)
Standard Treatment, Then Virtual Reality + Standard Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have an initial painful bedside procedure (eg: bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment only. After a washout period, they then will have a repeat procedure (eg: similar bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment AND virtual reality
Virtual Reality + Standard Treatment, Then Standard Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have an initial painful bedside procedure (eg: bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment AND virtual reality. After a washout period, they then will have a repeat procedure (eg: similar bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment only.
Interventions
Virtual reality (VR) will be used in addition to standard analgesic practices during painful bedside procedures. A head mounted display (HMD, Oculus Go Model #1KWPH812PN8354) and noise-cancelling headphones (Sony Model #MDRZ110B) will be provided to the patient during the procedure. This unit involves the patient wearing VR goggles, noise-cancelling headphones, and using a smartphone-based program with various applications the patient can choose from for analgesia/relaxation (eg: calming imagery/scenery of nature, activities involving mindfulness, interactive games or guided imagery, music and imagery, exercise imagery...etc). There are numerous, standard applications available for the patient to choose from, and the choice of most optimal application for analgesia, distraction, or anxiolysis will be left to the decision of the patient prior to their procedure.
Pharmacologic sedation or high dose opioids (e.g. nurse-administered IV opioids, anxiolytics and sedatives, patient-controlled analgesia, anesthesiologist administered sedation, general anesthesia if required)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing recurrent painful bedside procedures during hospitalization (at least 2 similar procedures during the course of hospital stay eg: wound dressing change)
- Anticipated duration of bedside procedure less than or equal to 2 hours
- Patients 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
- Patients experiencing pain and/or anxiety from their bedside procedure (these patients are expected to benefit most from the analgesic/anxiolytic effects of VR).
- Patients who not wish to observe the painful bedside procedure (VR unit will provide sensory distraction and immersive experience, with HMD/goggles/headset, that allows patient not to witness procedure).
- Patients with adequate vision and hearing (with hearing aids if necessary) - patients with sensory limitations may not be able to benefit from the full effects of the VR sensory stimulation.
- Patients who are medically stable (should be free of acute conditions that could be dangerous when using VR)
You may not qualify if:
- Active seizure disorder, recent stroke (within 3 months), elevated intracranial pressure (visual and/or auditory stimulation may cause concerns with worsening acute central nervous system conditions)
- High risk for or active substance withdrawal; active substance intoxication (VR stimulation may worsen symptoms associated with substance intoxication and withdrawal)
- Active delirium (may preclude safe and effective use of VR as intended for anxiolysis and analgesia)
- Poor vision and hearing (precludes VR stimuli from being effective if the patient has sensory impairments that prevent them from seeing/hearing the VR effects)
- Open head/neck wound or head/neck injuries precluding safe use or wearing of the VR unit (headset, HMD, headphones)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Indovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.
PMID: 29485536BACKGROUNDMallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31308733BACKGROUNDGupta A, Scott K, Dukewich M. Innovative Technology Using Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pain: Does It Reduce Pain via Distraction, or Is There More to It? Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):151-159. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx109.
PMID: 29025113BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda Hung, MD, FRCPC
University of Calgary
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 2, 2020
First Posted
January 6, 2020
Study Start
January 30, 2020
Primary Completion
January 20, 2021
Study Completion
January 20, 2021
Last Updated
January 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share