NCT04218396

Brief Summary

Currently, most analgesic regimens for painful bedside procedures rely on pharmacologic sedation or high doses of opioids (e.g.: nurse-administered IV opioids, anxiolytics, and sedatives; patient-controlled analgesia; anesthesiologist-administered sedation; and occasionally general anesthesia). Pharmacologic interventions are frequently associated with suboptimal analgesia, opioid-induced side effects, requirement for increased monitoring due to over sedation, and progressive acute tolerance to opioids over time, particularly with multiple/repeat procedures. Alternative, non-pharmacologic strategies may help reduce pain, side-effects and opioid tolerance associated with painful bedside procedures. These strategies have not been studied as extensively, but are becoming more important in view of the current national opioid crisis. In particular, with recent technologic advancements, virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a non-pharmacologic modality for analgesia and anxiolysis, which can have tremendous benefits in acute pain management. VR provides an immersive, realistic, often interactive experience for the user. It is frequently described as "transporting" the user to an alternate environment, with the use of high-fidelity head-mounted displays (HMD), noise-cancelling headsets, and a complete audio-visual experience. The user's sense of "presence" in the VR environment is crucial in providing patient engagement, and correlates with non-pharmacologic pain control. VR has been shown to provide non-pharmacologic analgesia in children and adults undergoing painful procedures such as bedside wound care, burn treatment, and physical therapy. The use of VR during painful bedside procedures is one specific setting which offers a good starting point to investigate this technology for acute pain management. Our study wishes to determine if VR plus standard therapy provides superior analgesia for painful bedside procedures (e.g. burn treatment, wound care) compared with standard therapy alone. Our primary outcome is a reduction in pain scores by 30%, as measured by a numerical analog scale (NAS) during painful bedside procedures. The investigators will use a randomized, cross-over study design in which hospitalized patients receiving repeated painful bedside procedures, will be randomized to 2 groups. Group A will have an initial painful bedside procedure under standard treatment only, and a repeat procedure under standard treatment + VR. Group B will have an initial procedure under standard treatment +VR, and a subsequent one under standard treatment. Questionnaires including pain scores and secondary outcomes will be administered to each patient before and after the bedside procedure. A convenience sample of patients will be recruited over 1 year (anticipated N\~30).

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 2, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 6, 2020

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 30, 2020

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 20, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 20, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 9, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

January 2, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 6, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Acute PainVirtual RealityAnxiolysisAnalgesiaNon-pharmacologicPainful bedside procedureWound careDressing change

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numerical Analog Scale Pain Score

    The primary outcome is a reduction in pain scores by 30%, as measured by a numerical analog scale (NAS) during painful bedside procedures. Minimum scale value 0, maximum 10, higher scores mean more pain, lower scores mean less pain.

    During painful bedside procedure

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Anxiety score - State Trait Anxiety Index short form questionnaire

    During painful bedside procedure

  • Quality of life measures - Quality of Recovery 15 questionnaire

    During painful bedside procedure

  • Opioid use during painful bedside procedure

    During painful bedside procedure

  • Number of participants with side effects related to virtual reality use during painful beside procedure (Nausea, dizziness, and other patient-reported adverse events)

    During painful bedside procedure

Study Arms (2)

Standard Treatment, Then Virtual Reality + Standard Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have an initial painful bedside procedure (eg: bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment only. After a washout period, they then will have a repeat procedure (eg: similar bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment AND virtual reality

Device: Virtual Reality use during painful bedside procedureDrug: Standard Treatment during painful bedside procedure

Virtual Reality + Standard Treatment, Then Standard Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have an initial painful bedside procedure (eg: bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment AND virtual reality. After a washout period, they then will have a repeat procedure (eg: similar bedside wound care or dressing change) under standard treatment only.

Device: Virtual Reality use during painful bedside procedureDrug: Standard Treatment during painful bedside procedure

Interventions

Virtual reality (VR) will be used in addition to standard analgesic practices during painful bedside procedures. A head mounted display (HMD, Oculus Go Model #1KWPH812PN8354) and noise-cancelling headphones (Sony Model #MDRZ110B) will be provided to the patient during the procedure. This unit involves the patient wearing VR goggles, noise-cancelling headphones, and using a smartphone-based program with various applications the patient can choose from for analgesia/relaxation (eg: calming imagery/scenery of nature, activities involving mindfulness, interactive games or guided imagery, music and imagery, exercise imagery...etc). There are numerous, standard applications available for the patient to choose from, and the choice of most optimal application for analgesia, distraction, or anxiolysis will be left to the decision of the patient prior to their procedure.

Standard Treatment, Then Virtual Reality + Standard TreatmentVirtual Reality + Standard Treatment, Then Standard Treatment

Pharmacologic sedation or high dose opioids (e.g. nurse-administered IV opioids, anxiolytics and sedatives, patient-controlled analgesia, anesthesiologist administered sedation, general anesthesia if required)

Standard Treatment, Then Virtual Reality + Standard TreatmentVirtual Reality + Standard Treatment, Then Standard Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing recurrent painful bedside procedures during hospitalization (at least 2 similar procedures during the course of hospital stay eg: wound dressing change)
  • Anticipated duration of bedside procedure less than or equal to 2 hours
  • Patients 18 years or older and able to provide informed consent
  • Patients experiencing pain and/or anxiety from their bedside procedure (these patients are expected to benefit most from the analgesic/anxiolytic effects of VR).
  • Patients who not wish to observe the painful bedside procedure (VR unit will provide sensory distraction and immersive experience, with HMD/goggles/headset, that allows patient not to witness procedure).
  • Patients with adequate vision and hearing (with hearing aids if necessary) - patients with sensory limitations may not be able to benefit from the full effects of the VR sensory stimulation.
  • Patients who are medically stable (should be free of acute conditions that could be dangerous when using VR)

You may not qualify if:

  • Active seizure disorder, recent stroke (within 3 months), elevated intracranial pressure (visual and/or auditory stimulation may cause concerns with worsening acute central nervous system conditions)
  • High risk for or active substance withdrawal; active substance intoxication (VR stimulation may worsen symptoms associated with substance intoxication and withdrawal)
  • Active delirium (may preclude safe and effective use of VR as intended for anxiolysis and analgesia)
  • Poor vision and hearing (precludes VR stimuli from being effective if the patient has sensory impairments that prevent them from seeing/hearing the VR effects)
  • Open head/neck wound or head/neck injuries precluding safe use or wearing of the VR unit (headset, HMD, headphones)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Indovina P, Barone D, Gallo L, Chirico A, De Pietro G, Giordano A. Virtual Reality as a Distraction Intervention to Relieve Pain and Distress During Medical Procedures: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):858-877. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000599.

    PMID: 29485536BACKGROUND
  • Mallari B, Spaeth EK, Goh H, Boyd BS. Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 3;12:2053-2085. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200498. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31308733BACKGROUND
  • Gupta A, Scott K, Dukewich M. Innovative Technology Using Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pain: Does It Reduce Pain via Distraction, or Is There More to It? Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):151-159. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx109.

    PMID: 29025113BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute PainAgnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Linda Hung, MD, FRCPC

    University of Calgary

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2020

First Posted

January 6, 2020

Study Start

January 30, 2020

Primary Completion

January 20, 2021

Study Completion

January 20, 2021

Last Updated

January 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share