Does the Understanding of Placebo Mechanisms Compensate for the Loss of Efficacy Associated With Open Label Placebo
PLACETHIC
Does the Subject's Understanding of Underlying Placebo Mechanisms Compensate for the Loss of Efficacy Associated With the Disclosure of the Use of a Placebo
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The investigators are investigating whether, when given detailed information about underlying placebo mechanisms and pain, subjects will have a response similar to that of those subjected to a procedure in which they receive a conventional placebo treatment (associated with deception). STUDY DESIGN: This is a non-inferior parallel, controlled and randomized, single blind trial. POPULATION: The investigators will include in the study 126 subjects without known pathology. Participants will then be divided into 2 groups on a randomized basis. METHODOLOGY: Each subject will undergo three sessions of Cold Pressure Test (CPT), a cold pain stimulation method: calibration, condition of interest (conventional placebo or educated placebo) and control. The investigators' main judgment criterion is be the difference in pain intensity experienced on the visual analog scale between the CPT control and the CPT under the condition of interest. This study will allow the investigators to rule on the non-inferiority of an educated open label placebo compared to a conventional placebo in the context of an acute painful stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedMay 16, 2019
May 1, 2019
1 year
April 24, 2019
May 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 mm, with a non inferiority margin at 10 mm and a standard deviation at 22 mm.
At the end of the CPT procedure, within 30 seconds after the removal of the hand from the CPT cold water tank.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Anxiety respiratory frequency change
During the CPT procedure
Anxiety blood pressure change
During the CPT procedure
Knowledge of placebo's mechanisms
At the beginning and end of the CPT procedures
Perception of the investigator
At the end of the study, when all CPT procedures have been carried out, within 10 minutes after the last immersion
The Perceived Awareness of the Research Hypothesis Scale questionnaire
At the end of the study, when all CPT procedures have been carried out, within 10 minutes after the last immersion
Other Outcomes (1)
Blood pressure
About 1 minute before every CPT procedures and within 10 secondes after each CPT procedures
Study Arms (2)
Educated open label placebo
ACTIVE COMPARATORThese subjects will undergo all the same procedures as in the control group. But before the placebo CTP, they will watch a short movie explaining placebo mechanisms. While applying the placebo cream, they will be told that the cream is inert (placebo), efficient to decrease pain caused by cold and the mechanisms seen in the movie will take place.
Conventional placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORThese subjects will watch a video on hand washing. While applying the placebo cream, they will be told that this cream is effective to decreased pain caused by cold.
Interventions
Educational movie on placebo mechanisms : animated video, duration : 12 minutes. It will be followed by the CPTs : experimentally induced pain by keeping the non dominant hand in cold water (1° Celsius) for a limited time. The duration of immersion is personal and calibrated to be around to ensure that the intensity of pain will be homogeneous (around 7/10 on the visual analogue scale with no treatment)
Animated video, duration : 11 minutes. It will be followed by the CPTs : experimentally induced pain by keeping the non dominant hand in cold water (1° Celsius) for a limited time. The duration of immersion is personal and calibrated to be around to ensure that the intensity of pain will be homogeneous (around 7/10 on the visual analogue scale with no treatment).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Person affiliated to Social Security
- Informed consent, written and signed by the subject.
You may not qualify if:
- Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the Public Health Code (CSP), which corresponds to all protected persons: pregnant women, parturient women, nursing mothers, persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons subject to a legal protection measure, cannot be included in clinical trials.
- Persons with a pathology against indicating the use of CPT experimentally induced pain :
- Any pathologies affecting the venous, arterial or lymphatic system
- Diabetes
- Cardiac disorders
- Asthma
- Frostbite
- Epilepsy
- Arthritis
- Lupus erythematosus
- Allergy to Cremafluid® cream
- Person with concomitant treatment that modifies sensitivity to pain, chronic or acute at the time of the experiment, such as analgesics, psychotropic drugs or anti-inflammatories.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Leo Druart
Grenoble, France
Saraeve Graham Longsworth
Grenoble, France
Related Publications (11)
Kaptchuk TJ, Friedlander E, Kelley JM, Sanchez MN, Kokkotou E, Singer JP, Kowalczykowski M, Miller FG, Kirsch I, Lembo AJ. Placebos without deception: a randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One. 2010 Dec 22;5(12):e15591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015591.
PMID: 21203519BACKGROUNDLocher C, Frey Nascimento A, Kirsch I, Kossowsky J, Meyer A, Gaab J. Is the rationale more important than deception? A randomized controlled trial of open-label placebo analgesia. Pain. 2017 Dec;158(12):2320-2328. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001012.
PMID: 28708766BACKGROUNDBenedetti F, Carlino E, Pollo A. How placebos change the patient's brain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 Jan;36(1):339-54. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.81. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PMID: 20592717BACKGROUNDBenedetti F, Amanzio M. Mechanisms of the placebo response. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Oct;26(5):520-3. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
PMID: 23370213BACKGROUNDColloca L, Howick J. Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:219-240. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
PMID: 29681327BACKGROUNDVoudouris NJ, Peck CL, Coleman G. The role of conditioning and verbal expectancy in the placebo response. Pain. 1990 Oct;43(1):121-128. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)90057-K.
PMID: 2277714BACKGROUNDPecina M, Zubieta JK. Expectancy Modulation of Opioid Neurotransmission. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:17-37. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
PMID: 29681324BACKGROUNDMitchell LA, MacDonald RA, Brodie EE. Temperature and the cold pressor test. J Pain. 2004 May;5(4):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.03.004.
PMID: 15162346BACKGROUNDStreff A, Kuehl LK, Michaux G, Anton F. Differential physiological effects during tonic painful hand immersion tests using hot and ice water. Eur J Pain. 2010 Mar;14(3):266-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
PMID: 19540783BACKGROUNDCarvalho C, Caetano JM, Cunha L, Rebouta P, Kaptchuk TJ, Kirsch I. Open-label placebo treatment in chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2016 Dec;157(12):2766-2772. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000700.
PMID: 27755279BACKGROUNDDruart L, Graham Longsworth S, Rolland C, Dolgopoloff M, Terrisse H, Bosson JL, Pinsault N. Can an Open-Label Placebo Be as Effective as a Deceptive Placebo? Methodological Considerations of a Study Protocol. Medicines (Basel). 2020 Jan 2;7(1):3. doi: 10.3390/medicines7010003.
PMID: 31906435DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leo DRUART
TIMC IMAG Thémas team
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
SaraEve GRAHAM LONGSWORTH
TIMC IMAG Thémas team
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Nicolas PINSAULT
TIMC IMAG Thémas team
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Only the subjects in the the conventional placebo group will be masked. In the educated open label placebo group, subjects will be aware that the cream is inert.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2019
First Posted
May 1, 2019
Study Start
May 3, 2019
Primary Completion
May 3, 2020
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
May 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05