A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
A Comparison of Short-term and Long- Term Outcomes Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
272
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgery is still the main treatment for esophageal cancer, however, the complication and mortality rate of open esophagectomy is high. As a result, the thoracoscopic- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was developed. The MIE mainly comprised two surgical approaches: MIE McKeown approach (cervical anastomosis) and MIE Ivor-Lewis approach (intrathoracicanastomosis). The MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis) is increasingly used for the treatment of mid and lower esophageal cancers. Our study is trying to compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term and long- term outcomes between MIE Ivor-Lewis approach and MIE McKeown approach for the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer and esophageal- gastric junction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 3, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedFebruary 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.5 years
January 1, 2020
February 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall postoperative complications
Overall postoperative complication rates
within one month
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Operating time
1 day
Lymph nodes harvested
1 day
Blood loss
1 day
Anastomotic leak
within one month
Pulmonary complication
1 month
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ivor-Lewis group
EXPERIMENTALminimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis
McKeown group
ACTIVE COMPARATORminimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with cervical anastomosis
Interventions
minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with intrathoracic anastomosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (I) Patients with clinically staged T1-3N0-2M0 tumors; good cardiopulmonary function;
- (II) Patients with lower thoracic esophageal tumors and esophageal- gastric junction tumor;
- (III) Patients without a previous history of cancer;
- (IV) Patients without a previous history of neck or chest surgery;
You may not qualify if:
- (I) cardiopulmonary function not good enough for surgery;
- (II) Patients with hybrid MIE
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yunpeng Zhao
Jinan, Shandong, 250033, China
Related Publications (1)
Zhao Y, Shan L, Peng C, Cong B, Zhao X. Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 10;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01712-7.
PMID: 34758861DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2020
First Posted
January 3, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02