NCT04208048

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is post-market, patient outcome research to evaluate medical device safety and effectiveness. The data collected will assess the safety of the FLXfit 15TM (studydevice) system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 15, 2018

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 6, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 23, 2019

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (26)

  • Fusion

    Did patient achieve fusion?

    through study completion; 2 year

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Back

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    6-week

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Back

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    12- week

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Back

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    6-month

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Back

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    1-year

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Back

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    2-year

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Leg

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    6-week

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Leg

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    12- week

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Leg

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    6-month

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Leg

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    1-year

  • Visual Analogue Pain Scale: Leg

    0 to 10 score; higher score means worse pain

    2-year

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    0 to 100 score; higher score means greater patient disability

    6-week

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    0 to 100 score; higher score means greater patient disability

    12- week

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    0 to 100 score; higher score means greater patient disability

    6-month

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    0 to 100 score; higher score means greater patient disability

    1-year

  • Oswestry Disability Index

    0 to 100 score; higher score means greater patient disability

    2-year

  • Short Form-12 Health Survey

    0 to 100 score; higher score means less patient disability

    6-week

  • Short Form-12 Health Survey

    0 to 100 score; higher score means less patient disability

    12-week

  • Short Form-12 Health Survey

    0 to 100 score; higher score means less patient disability

    6-month

  • Short Form-12 Health Survey

    0 to 100 score; higher score means less patient disability

    1-year

  • Short Form-12 Health Survey

    0 to 100 score; higher score means less patient disability

    2-year

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    20 to 80 score; higher score means higher reported self-capability

    6-week

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    20 to 80 score; higher score means higher reported self-capability

    12- week

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    20 to 80 score; higher score means higher reported self-capability

    6-month

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    20 to 80 score; higher score means higher reported self-capability

    1-year

  • Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    20 to 80 score; higher score means higher reported self-capability

    2-year

Study Arms (1)

FLXfit 15

The FLXfit 15 device will then be placed into the space between the low backbones, using specific medical instruments, where the damaged disc was removed.

Device: FLXfit 15TM device

Interventions

In order to implant the FLXfit 15TM device properly, your study doctor will first prepare the space between the low back bones (vertebrae) and then remove your damaged disc. The FLXfit 15TM device will then be placed into the space between the low backbones, using specific medical instruments, where the damaged disc was removed.

FLXfit 15

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. Patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). Patients should be skeletally mature and have completed six months of non-operative treatment.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (18-70 y/o)
  • Male or Female
  • With the following conditions of the lumbar spine as confirmed by advanced imaging (CT or MRI), who is a candidate for primary spinal fusion procedure according to acceptable criteria for such medical conditions:
  • Degenerative disc disease with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis
  • Spondylolisthesis
  • Failure of at least 6-months conservative treatment
  • BMI \< 40
  • Patient to approve no pregnancy during the 24 months of study and no participation in other studies in parallel to this one
  • Ability to read, understand, and sign informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Infection, local to the operative site
  • Signs of local inflammation
  • Fever or leukocytosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Significant mental disorder or condition that could compromise the patient's ability to remember and comply with preoperative and postoperative instructions (e.g. current treatment for a psychiatric/psychosocial disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, traumatic head injury)
  • Prior surgical procedure (with the exception of decompression only procedure) at the index level(s) using the desired operative approach
  • Prior fusion procedure at an adjacent level
  • Any other condition which would preclude the potential benefit of spinal implant surgery, such as the presence of tumors or congenital abnormalities, fracture local to the operating site, elevation of segmentation rate unexplained by other diseases, elevation of white blood count (WBC), or a marked left shift in the WBC differential count
  • Neuromuscular disorder that would engender unacceptable risk of instability, implant fixation failure, or complications in postoperative care
  • Active local infection in or near the operative region
  • Active systemic infection and/or disease
  • Severe osteoporosis or insufficient bone density, which in the medical opinion of the physician precludes surgery or contraindicates instrumentation
  • Endocrine or metabolic disorders known to affect osteogenesis (e.g. Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy, hypothyroidism)
  • Systemic disease that requires the chronic administration of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory or steroidal drugs
  • Suspected or documented allergy or intolerance to implant's materials
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Attending Orthopedic Surgeon

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2019

First Posted

December 23, 2019

Study Start

October 15, 2018

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

August 22, 2022

Last Updated

March 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All study related documents will be shared through a password protected and encrypted program managed by Midwest Orthopedics IT department.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The data will become available after the participant has signed the informed consent and will remain available until the study is closed.
Access Criteria
The study staff will have to complete HIPPA and confidentiality training. In addition, they must by Midwest Orthopedics staff who will access the information on a password protected and encrypted computer.

Locations