Study Stopped
Covid 19 and subsequent cancellation of all meeting activity
Interprofessional Versus Monoprofessional Case-based Learning in Childhood Cancer
INCAsE
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interprofessional education in childhood cancer is a multifaceted field. It involves multiple healthcare professionals with general and specialised knowledge and skills. Complex treatment, care and rehabilitation require continuous professional development and maintenance of healthcare professionals' competencies in their own professional field. Limited knowledge exists on comparing interprofessional and monoprofessional education and only few randomised studies have evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of interprofessional education. One clinical area among others where healthcare professionals collaborate is in gastrointestinal toxicities and side effects. These are frequent and potentially severe clinical problems in childhood cancer that involve multiple healthcare professionals. Objectives: To study the effect of interprofessional versus monoprofessional case-based learning on healthcare professionals' attitudes on interprofessional learning and collaboration. Trial design: single centre investigator-initiated cluster randomized trial Methods: Participants: Employees with patient-related work at the childhood cancer departments and affiliated with childhood cancer at Rigshospitalet are eligible for inclusion. The setting is the childhood cancer department. Outcome: The primary outcome is to improve healthcare professionals' interprofessional attitude. Measurements: The primary outcome is attitudes measured by the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS). Secondary outcome is Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) Questionnaire, and Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). Knowledge will be measured by written test as multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ). Timepoints: The self-reported questionnaires will be distributed to the participants approximately one month before and one month after the educational intervention. On the day of the educational intervention, participants will answer the multiple choice questionnaire. Analysis: Linear mixed regression will be used to compare differences in mean scores postintervention, adjusted for differences between the two groups. Results: We hypothesise that interprofessional case-based learning positively affects the healthcare professionals' interprofessional attitudes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 5, 2020
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
September 1, 2020
15 days
December 10, 2019
September 8, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the participants' interprofessional collaboration
Primary outcome: change in the participants' interprofessional attitude to collaboration measured by Assessment of interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS). The scale contains three main categories: 1)Partnership/shared decision making (19 items), 2) Collaboration (11 items), 3) Coordination (7 items) that are rated on a scale from 1-5 (1= "never"; 2= "rarely"; 3="occasionally"; 4="most of the time"; 5="Always"). The scales procedures scores from 48 to 240. Higher scores indicate a better outcome
Measured 1 month before intervention and 1-3 months after intervention in both groups
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in the participants' interprofessional attitudes
Measured 1 month before intervention and 1-3 months after intervention in both groups
Change in participants' knowledge of gastrointestinal toxicities and side effects
measured at the actual intervention day 30 minutes prior to the session and immediately after the education session (maximum 15 minutes after)
Study Arms (2)
Interprofessional case-based learning
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental intervention will be the interprofessional group receiving case-based learning about gastro-intestinal toxicities and side effects of children and adolescents with cancer.
Monoprofessional case-based learning
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group is the monoprofessional group that will receive the same case-based learning as the intervention group.
Interventions
The trial is an educational intervention where groups of healthcare professionals receive the same case-based learning: one group receives case-based learning with healthcare professionals of various professional backgrounds (experimental) versus another group receiving case-based learning with healthcare professionals exclusively of the same professional background (control). The educational intervention consists of a case that is developed for the purpose of the intervention. The participants in the experimental group will be randomised into six teams who will receive interprofessional case-based learning. The experimental group will be made up of healthcare professionals from various groups. The participants in the control group will be randomised in groups of one profession
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare professionals at the in-patient department for children and adolescents with cancer
- Healthcare professionals at the in-patient department for transplantation of children and adolescents with cancer
- Healthcare professionals at the out-patient departments for children and adolescents with cancer department
- Healthcare professionals affiliated with Juliane Marie Centre at Rigshospitalet
- Employees in a supportive function to the department for children and adolescents with cancer, such as psychologists, priests, pedagogues, social workers, experts in pain relief in children, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and dieticians.
- Teachers employed at a local public school but have their main working hours at the department.
You may not qualify if:
- Staff taking part in the intervention or in the planning of the intervention
- Management with staff responsibilities
- Lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- Danish Child Cancer Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction (JMC), Rigshospitalet (RH), Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (31)
Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3.
PMID: 28639262BACKGROUNDReeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Hammick M, Koppel I. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD002213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub2.
PMID: 18254002BACKGROUNDMarcussen M, Norgaard B, Borgnakke K, Arnfred S. Interprofessional clinical training in mental health improves students' readiness for interprofessional collaboration: a non-randomized intervention study. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1465-6.
PMID: 30658648BACKGROUNDRuebling I, Pole D, Breitbach AP, Frager A, Kettenbach G, Westhus N, Kienstra K, Carlson J. A comparison of student attitudes and perceptions before and after an introductory interprofessional education experience. J Interprof Care. 2014 Jan;28(1):23-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.829421. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PMID: 24000881BACKGROUNDNorgaard B, Ammentorp J, Kofoed PE, Kyvik KO. Training improves inter-collegial communication. Clin Teach. 2012 Jun;9(3):173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00525.x.
PMID: 22587317BACKGROUNDCraig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PMID: 18824488BACKGROUNDCampbell MJ, Donner A, Klar N. Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine. Stat Med. 2007 Jan 15;26(1):2-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.2731.
PMID: 17136746BACKGROUNDUkoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92. No abstract available.
PMID: 10982317BACKGROUNDAllen LM, Palermo C, Armstrong E, Hay M. Categorising the broad impacts of continuing professional development: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2019 Nov;53(11):1087-1099. doi: 10.1111/medu.13922. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
PMID: 31396999BACKGROUNDThistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: 50 years and counting. Med Educ. 2016 Nov;50(11):1082-1086. doi: 10.1111/medu.12959. No abstract available.
PMID: 27762034BACKGROUNDCampbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE.
PMID: 17332585BACKGROUNDTopperzer MK, Larsen HB, Hoffmann M, Schmiegelow K, Lausen B, Madsen M, Roland P, Sorensen JL. Response to: Patient-centred medical education: A proposed definition. Med Teach. 2020 Mar;42(3):360-361. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1625315. Epub 2019 Jun 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 31185784BACKGROUNDCampbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
PMID: 22951546RESULTReaman GH. Pediatric cancer research from past successes through collaboration to future transdisciplinary research. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2004 May-Jun;21(3):123-7. doi: 10.1177/1043454204264406.
PMID: 15296038RESULTChristiansen HL, Bingen K, Hoag JA, Karst JS, Velazquez-Martin B, Barakat LP. Providing Children and Adolescents Opportunities for Social Interaction as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Dec;62 Suppl 5:S724-49. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25774.
PMID: 26700923RESULTGatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, Dimitrova N, Jakab Z, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Mallone S, Marcos-Gragera R, Minicozzi P, Sanchez-Perez MJ, Sant M, Santaquilani M, Stiller C, Tavilla A, Trama A, Visser O, Peris-Bonet R; EUROCARE Working Group. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):35-47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
PMID: 24314616RESULTFish JD. No childhood cancer survivor left behind. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Feb;64(2):223-224. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26260. Epub 2016 Sep 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 27615193RESULTSchmiegelow K, Attarbaschi A, Barzilai S, Escherich G, Frandsen TL, Halsey C, Hough R, Jeha S, Kato M, Liang DC, Mikkelsen TS, Moricke A, Niinimaki R, Piette C, Putti MC, Raetz E, Silverman LB, Skinner R, Tuckuviene R, van der Sluis I, Zapotocka E; Ponte di Legno toxicity working group. Consensus definitions of 14 severe acute toxic effects for childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia treatment: a Delphi consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):e231-e239. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30035-3.
PMID: 27299279RESULTAnderson RA, Marshall NS. The importance of the pediatric oncologist-nurse partnership in the delivery of total care in pediatric oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2000 Apr;34(4):263-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(200004)34:43.0.co;2-a. No abstract available.
PMID: 10742064RESULTTopperzer MK, Hoffmann M, Roug LI, Larsen HB, Lausen B, Schmiegelow K, Sorensen JL. Unmet need for interprofessional education in paediatric cancer: a scoping review. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3627-3637. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04856-4. Epub 2019 May 24.
PMID: 31127437RESULTThomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum Development for Medical Education : A Six-Step Approach. Baltimore, UNITED STATES: Springer Publishing Company; 2016.
RESULTFinley GA, Forgeron P, Arnaout M. Action research: developing a pediatric cancer pain program in jordan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Apr;35(4):447-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.006. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
PMID: 18258410RESULTLindqvist S, Duncan A, Shepstone L, Watts F, Pearce S. Case-based learning in cross-professional groups - the development of a pre-registration interprofessional learning programme. J Interprof Care. 2005 Oct;19(5):509-20. doi: 10.1080/13561820500126854.
PMID: 16308173RESULTKiessling A, Henriksson P. Efficacy of case method learning in general practice for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease: randomised controlled study. BMJ. 2002 Oct 19;325(7369):877-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.877.
PMID: 12386042RESULTKiessling A, Lewitt M, Henriksson P. Case-based training of evidence-based clinical practice in primary care and decreased mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Ann Fam Med. 2011 May-Jun;9(3):211-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1248.
PMID: 21555748RESULTHellman T, Jensen I, Orchard C, Bergstrom G. Preliminary testing of the Swedish version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS-S). J Interprof Care. 2016 Jul;30(4):499-504. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2016.1159184. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
PMID: 27268309RESULTOrchard CA, King GA, Khalili H, Bezzina MB. Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): development and testing of the instrument. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Winter;32(1):58-67. doi: 10.1002/chp.21123.
PMID: 22447712RESULTMcFadyen AK, Webster V, Strachan K, Figgins E, Brown H, McKechnie J. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: a possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. J Interprof Care. 2005 Dec;19(6):595-603. doi: 10.1080/13561820500430157.
PMID: 16373215RESULTNorgaard B, Draborg E, Sorensen J. Adaptation and reliability of the Readiness for Inter professional Learning Scale in a Danish student and health professional setting. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 16;16:60. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0591-7.
PMID: 26879933RESULTDeneckere S, Euwema M, Lodewijckx C, Panella M, Mutsvari T, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K. Better interprofessional teamwork, higher level of organized care, and lower risk of burnout in acute health care teams using care pathways: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):99-107. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182763312.
PMID: 23132203RESULTTopperzer MK, Hoffmann M, Larsen HB, Rosthoj S, Nersting J, Roug LI, Pontoppidan P, Andres-Jensen L, Lausen B, Schmiegelow K, Sorensen JL. Interprofessional versus monoprofessional case-based learning in childhood cancer and the effect on healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes: study protocol for a randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):1124. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05980-2.
PMID: 33276789DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jette L Sørensen
Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction (JMC), Rigshospitalet (RH), Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2019
First Posted
December 18, 2019
Study Start
February 25, 2020
Primary Completion
March 11, 2020
Study Completion
May 5, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Randomisation is performed centrally by a computer-generated allocation sequence concealed for the investigators