'In Situ Simulation' Versus 'Off Site Simulation' in Obstetric Emergencies
A Randomised Educational Feasibility Trial: 'In Situ Simulation' Versus 'Off Site Simulation' in Obstetric Emergencies and the Effect on Knowledge, Safety-attitudes, Team Performance, Stress, and Motivation
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Care for pregnant is a field where unexpected emergencies occur, however emergencies are rare and hence competences difficult to learn. Therefore, it can be relevant to use simulation-based medical education. Many questions on how simulation can optimise learning remain unanswered. A major question is how simulation settings as 'in situ simulation' (i.e. in the actual patient care unit) versus 'off site simulation' (i.e. in training rooms or simulation center) impact learning. Objectives: To study the effect of 'in situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' on learning outcome, safety-attitudes, team performance and clinical performance in the simulated setting plus stress and motivational inducing effect of simulation settings. Design: Randomised trial. Primary outcome: Written knowledge-test. Exploratory outcomes: Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, team- and clinical performance score, validated stress inventory, salivary cortisol, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory and questionnaire on perceptions of the simulation and organisational changes needed. Perspective: To provide new knowledge on contextual effects of different simulation settings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedDecember 18, 2015
December 1, 2015
6 months
January 30, 2013
December 17, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Knowledge test by written test as multiple-choice questions (MCQ).
The intervention will be applied on ten training days. Each training day will include training of one authentic team consisting of ten health care professionals.
The participants will get a knowledge test at the training day they will participate in. Ten training days will be conducted in a 3 months period
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Exploratory outcomes: Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ).
The participants will answer the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) 3-6 weeks before and 3-6 weeks after the training day they will participate in. Ten training days will be conducted in a 3 months period.
Exploratory outcomes: Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).
Video's will be recorded at the ten training days (within a 3 months period) and within approximately 4 months after the video's will be assessed by independent observers.
Exploratory outcomes: Video assessment: Clinical performance in the simulated setting.
Video's will be recorded at the ten training days (within a 3 months period) and within approximately 4 months after be assessed by independent observers.
Exploratory outcome: Salivary cortisol
Participants will have testing for salivary cortisol before and after the two simulated scenarios that will be conducted on the training they will participate in.
Exploratory outcome: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1).
Participants will respond on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-1) before and after the two simulated scenarios that will be conducted on the training day they will participate in.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
In situ simulation
EXPERIMENTAL'In situ simulation' which is training in the actual patient care unit, in this situation the labour suite and operation theatre
Off site simulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group will receive the same training 'off site simulation', i.e., in training rooms away from the actual patient care unit.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Health-care professionals (specialised obstetricians, trainee obstetricians, midwifes, auxiliary nurses, specialised anaesthetists, trainee anaesthetists, anaesthesia nurses, and surgical nurses) employed at the Obstetric or Anaesthesia departments at Rigshospitalet and trainee doctors having part of their training programme at Juliane Marie Centre for children, women and reproduction, Rigshospitalet.
- Participants shall work in the evening-, night- and weekend-shift duties with some of their work in labour ward
- Provide signed informed consent before randomisation
You may not qualify if:
- Manager with staff responsibilities. Staff taking part in planning of the intervention.
- Lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rigshospitalet, Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Related Publications (3)
Fransen AF, van de Ven J, Banga FR, Mol BWJ, Oei SG. Multi-professional simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies for improving patient outcomes and trainees' performance. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 16;12(12):CD011545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011545.pub2.
PMID: 33325570DERIVEDSorensen JL, van der Vleuten C, Rosthoj S, Ostergaard D, LeBlanc V, Johansen M, Ekelund K, Starkopf L, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Weikop P, Ottesen B. Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 6;5(10):e008344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008344.
PMID: 26443654DERIVEDSorensen JL, Van der Vleuten C, Lindschou J, Gluud C, Ostergaard D, LeBlanc V, Johansen M, Ekelund K, Albrechtsen CK, Pedersen BW, Kjaergaard H, Weikop P, Ottesen B. 'In situ simulation' versus 'off site simulation' in obstetric emergencies and their effect on knowledge, safety attitudes, team performance, stress, and motivation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Jul 17;14:220. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-220.
PMID: 23870501DERIVED
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jette Led Sørensen, MD, MMEd
Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction , Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Consultant Obstetric Gynecologist, MMEd, Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2013
First Posted
February 15, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 18, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12