Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer
A Single Center, Open, Randomized Clinical Trial:Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)in Gastrointestinal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
356
1 country
1
Brief Summary
At present, there are more and more reports about enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in China, but there is no ERAS treatment standard for gastrointestinal cancer, and there are many factors limiting the development of ERAS. In recent years, due to the development of minimally invasive technology, the establishment of evidence-based medicine model and the development of MDT, it makes a good solid foundation for the clinical application of ERAS. The implementation of ERAS requires the cooperation of surgeons, anesthesia management, nursing, rehabilitation and other teams. As an individualized treatment mode, ERAS focuses on the optimization of treatment for different individuals in order to acquire the best benefit of patients. Therefore, the concept of ERAS is still in the process of continuous improvement and development in China, hoping to explore the Chinese ERAS clinical pathway for gastrointestinal cancer. The purpose of this study is to optimize the clinical pathway of ERAS in the perioperative period of gastrointestinal cancer, and to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in gastrointestinal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 25, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 21, 2021
September 1, 2021
1 year
December 9, 2019
September 19, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Hospitalization Days
Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Time of getting out of bed after operation
Postoperative 7 days
The time to first flatus
Postoperative 7 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Expenses on medical treatment, medicine and hospitalization
On discharge, Postoperative up to 2 weeks
Incidence of postoperative complications
Postoperative 3 months、6 months、1 year
Study Arms (1)
ERAS
EXPERIMENTALPerioperative intervention with individual Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Interventions
Preoperative education,Preoperative nutritional support,Preoperative bowel preparation,Preventative applying of antibiotics,Intraoperative warming,Goal-directed fluid therapy,Postoperative analgesia,Postoperative diet, drainage and activity management,Prevention of deep vein thrombosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sign the informed consent
- Preoperative pathology confirmed gastric cancer or colorectal cancer
- Age: 18-70 years, men or women
- According to NCCN guidelines, it is not Stage IV tumor
- Perform radical gastrectomy or radical colon cancer surgery (CME) or radical rectal cancer surgery (TME);
- ASA I-III
- Receive no radiotherapy or chemotherapy before operation
- The subjects can describe the symptoms objectively and keep the follow-up plan
You may not qualify if:
- Preoperative pathology confirmed no gastric cancer / no colorectal cancer (such as rectal neuroendocrine tumor, lymphoma, etc.)
- Stage IV or Radical resection can't be performed
- Emergency operation
- Can't cooperate with clinical data collection
- General condition is intolerable to operation
- Serious diseases, including heart function ≥ level II, respiratory function insufficiency, liver and kidney function insufficiency, and blood system diseases
- Patients participate in other clinical trials at the same time
- Pregnant or perinatal women
- Other malignant tumors
- History of mental illness
- Had a history of severe trauma within 4 weeks before admission
- Less than 6 months after other level 4 operations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Huashan Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University
Shanghai, 200040, China
Related Publications (10)
Wilmore DW, Kehlet H. Management of patients in fast track surgery. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):473-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7284.473. No abstract available.
PMID: 11222424RESULTLee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH, Park JS, Hong S, Lee TG, Ahn S. Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3902-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3006-4. Epub 2013 May 25.
PMID: 23708720RESULTKehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;396(5):585-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
PMID: 21468643RESULTAarts MA, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Victor JC, McLeod RS. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):442-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1897-5. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PMID: 22011937RESULTJie B, Jiang ZM, Nolan MT, Zhu SN, Yu K, Kondrup J. Impact of preoperative nutritional support on clinical outcome in abdominal surgical patients at nutritional risk. Nutrition. 2012 Oct;28(10):1022-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
PMID: 22673593RESULTLi P, Fang F, Cai JX, Tang D, Li QG, Wang DR. Fast-track rehabilitation vs conventional care in laparoscopic colorectal resection for colorectal malignancy: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 21;19(47):9119-26. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i47.9119.
PMID: 24379639RESULTLi YJ, Huo TT, Xing J, An JZ, Han ZY, Liu XN, Zhao QC. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2014 Dec;38(12):3142-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2690-0.
PMID: 25228170RESULTSpanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3443-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PMID: 25801106RESULTNi TG, Yang HT, Zhang H, Meng HP, Li B. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug 14;21(30):9209-16. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i30.9209.
PMID: 26290648RESULTSammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A, Kahokehr A, Hill AG. A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J. 2010 Jul 30;123(1319):61-70.
PMID: 20717178RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 9, 2019
First Posted
December 17, 2019
Study Start
December 25, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share