NCT04576533

Brief Summary

Early mobilization is considered as an important strategy to enhance postoperative recovery. However, direct association between very early mobilization and improved recovery needs randomized control trials to prove. This study proposes the program of walking out from operating room (WOFOR) after surgery, which means that encouraging patients to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb. The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effect of WOFOR on the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2020

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 6, 2020

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2020

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

September 30, 2020

Last Update Submit

July 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

early mobilization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Length of hospital stay after surgery

    hospital stay time from operation completion to actual hospital discharge

    at hospital discharge(expected 7 days after surgery)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Time to fulfill the criteria of hospital discharge (recovery time)

    expected 7 days after surgery

  • Re-admission incidence within 30 days after operation because of surgical complication

    30 days after operation

  • Postoperative recovery score using 40-item quality of recovery scoring system(QoR-40)

    at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery and at hospital discharge (up to 8 days after surgery

  • Anxiety state evaluated by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form. The form used in this study is the Chinese version.

    the day before surgery, and at 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day after surgery and at hospital discharge(up to 8 days after surgery

  • Severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    at 1-day, 2-day after surgery(up to 2 days after surgery)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

walk out from operating room

EXPERIMENTAL

patients will return to the ward after surgery by walking

Behavioral: walk out from operating room

leave operating room by transporting bed

NO INTERVENTION

patients will return to the ward after surgery by lying on the transporting bed

Interventions

After the surgery of laparoscopic colectomy or laparoscopic rectectomy surgery (Dixon technique), patients will be encouraged to walk out from the operating room and return to the ward by walking under the condition of stable physiological parameters, painlessness, clear consciousness and normal muscle strength of lower limb

walk out from operating room

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Age 18-65 Years old
  • \. scheduled for laparoscopic colectomy or laparoscopic rectectomy surgery (Dixon technique)
  • \. American Society of anesthesiology (ASA) grade I or grade II

You may not qualify if:

  • \. Patients have severe cardiac diseases (cardiac function grading greater than grade 3/arrhythmia including sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrioventricular block, frequent ventricular premature, multiple ventricular premature, ventricular premature R on T, ventricular fibrillation and ventricular flutter/acute coronary syndrome) or respiratory failure or hepatic failure or renal failure;
  • \. Patients with poor blood glucose control (glycosylated hemoglobin\>7%);
  • \. Patients with poor blood pressure control (receive regular antihypertensive medical treatment but still have systolic blood pressure \> 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg );
  • \. Patients have schizophrenia, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, mental retardation, or hearing impairment.
  • \. Patients have thrombosis such as in lower extremity or in other veins.
  • \. Patients have neuromuscular disorders affecting lower limb activity, such as myasthenia gravis and cerebral infarction, which cause lower limb muscle weakness;
  • \. Patients have contraindications for epidural puncture.
  • \. Patients refuse to sign informed consent for research.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Chughtai B, Abraham C, Finn D, Rosenberg S, Yarlagadda B, Perrotti M. Fast track open partial nephrectomy: reduced postoperative length of stay with a goal-directed pathway does not compromise outcome. Adv Urol. 2008;2008:507543. doi: 10.1155/2008/507543.

    PMID: 18784846BACKGROUND
  • Karl A, Buchner A, Becker A, Staehler M, Seitz M, Khoder W, Schneevoigt B, Weninger E, Rittler P, Grimm T, Gratzke C, Stief C. A new concept for early recovery after surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.019. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

    PMID: 23968966BACKGROUND
  • Barreca M, Renzi C, Tankel J, Shalhoub J, Sengupta N. Is there a role for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Preliminary results from a specialist obesity treatment center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jan;12(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

    PMID: 25892343BACKGROUND
  • Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, Artibani W, Gaston R, Piechaud T, Catto JW, Koupparis A, Rowe E, Perry M, Issa R, McGrath J, Kelly J, Schumacher M, Wijburg C, Canda AE, Balbay MD, Decaestecker K, Schwentner C, Stenzl A, Edeling S, Pokupic S, Stockle M, Siemer S, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Weston R, Johnson M, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A, Hosseini A, Wiklund PN. Enhanced Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy: EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group Consensus View. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.020. Epub 2016 May 24.

    PMID: 27234997BACKGROUND
  • Patel HR, Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheim T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsaether E, Wiklund P, Catto JW. Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

    PMID: 24183418BACKGROUND
  • Palumbo V, Giannarini G, Crestani A, Rossanese M, Calandriello M, Ficarra V. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Cystectomy Is Safe and Accelerates Bowel Function Recovery. Urology. 2018 May;115:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.043. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

    PMID: 29454972BACKGROUND
  • Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, Pruthi RS, Thalmann GN, Desai M. Enhanced Recovery after Urological Surgery: A Contemporary Systematic Review of Outcomes, Key Elements, and Research Needs. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

    PMID: 26970912BACKGROUND
  • Tyson MD, Chang SS. Enhanced Recovery Pathways Versus Standard Care After Cystectomy: A Meta-analysis of the Effect on Perioperative Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.031. Epub 2016 Jun 11.

    PMID: 27297680BACKGROUND
  • Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aarsether E, Wiklund P, Patel HR. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;32(6):879-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

    PMID: 24189391BACKGROUND
  • Semerjian A, Milbar N, Kates M, Gorin MA, Patel HD, Chalfin HJ, Frank SM, Wu CL, Yang WW, Hobson D, Robertson L, Wick E, Schoenberg MP, Pierorazio PM, Johnson MH, Stimson CJ, Bivalacqua TJ. Hospital Charges and Length of Stay Following Radical Cystectomy in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Era. Urology. 2018 Jan;111:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

    PMID: 29032237BACKGROUND
  • Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Mishima T, Yanishi M, Komai Y, Yasuda K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Watanabe M. Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;99(2):194-200. doi: 10.1159/000457805. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

    PMID: 28222423BACKGROUND
  • Lee TG, Kang SB, Kim DW, Hong S, Heo SC, Park KJ. Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Jan;54(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fcdb3e.

    PMID: 21160309BACKGROUND
  • van der Leeden M, Huijsmans R, Geleijn E, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Dekker J, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL. Early enforced mobilisation following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility and outcomes. Physiotherapy. 2016 Mar;102(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3722. Epub 2015 May 7.

    PMID: 26059985BACKGROUND
  • Ni CY, Wang ZH, Huang ZP, Zhou H, Fu LJ, Cai H, Huang XX, Yang Y, Li HF, Zhou WP. Early enforced mobilization after liver resection: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):254-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.060. Epub 2018 May 9.

    PMID: 29753000BACKGROUND
  • da Costa Torres D, Dos Santos PM, Reis HJ, Paisani DM, Chiavegato LD. Effectiveness of an early mobilization program on functional capacity after coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized controlled trial protocol. SAGE Open Med. 2016 Dec 14;4:2050312116682256. doi: 10.1177/2050312116682256. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 28348739BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • SanQing Jin, MD

    The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2020

First Posted

October 6, 2020

Study Start

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion

November 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Locations