NCT04201691

Brief Summary

This study is investigates the effect of cervical mobilization on tonus, position sense and balance in patient with multiple sclerosis. Half of participants will received classic rehabilitation program, while the other half will received servical mobilization in addition to classic rehabilitation program.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 17, 2019

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 7, 2020

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 2, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 10, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

December 12, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 9, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Change Modified ashworth scale

    Modified Ashworth Scale measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching and is used as a simple measure of spasticity. The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 4. Whether higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Change from Modified ashworth scale at one month

  • Change Berg Balance Test

    The scale rates performance from 0 (cannot perform) to 4 (normal performance) on 14 items. The items explore the ability to sit, stand, lean, turn and maintain the upright position on one leg. A cut-off score of 44 was established as a criterion to identify MS subjects with a high risk of fall based on results in the literature. The minumum value is 0, the maximum value is 56. Whether higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Change from Berg Balance Test at one month

  • Change Dynamic Gait Index

    The scale measures the mobility function and the dynamic balance. The eight tasks of this scale include walking, walking with head turns, pivoting, walking over objects, walking around objects and going up stairs. The performance is rated on a 4-point scale. A score of 19 or less has been shown to be related to self-reported falls in people with vestibular disorders. The minimum value is 8, the maximum value is 24. Whether higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Change from Dynamic Gait Index at one month

  • MyotonPRO

    The MyotonPRO is a small, noninvasive hand-held apparatus that provides objective measurements of mechanical muscle properties expressed on a continuous scale. After the device probe is positioned on the skin surface above the muscle being measured, and thereby slightly compressing subcutaneous superficial tissue, it exerts a light quick released mechanical impulse. The subsequent dampened oscillation of the muscle is recorded by an accelerometer and numeric values of muscle parameters are calculated, representing the muscle tone, and biomechanical properties.

    30 days

  • Change The timed 25-foot walk

    The T25-FW is easy to administer, is useful for a range of walking disabilities, and correlates well with other measures of walking ability. The shortening of the time indicate that the patient recovered.

    Change from The timed 25-foot walk at one month

  • Change Functional Reach Test

    A yardstick was mounted at the height of the patient's acromion. The patient was asked to stretch their arm parallel to the yardstick with fist closed. Then the patient was asked to lean forward as far a possible without taking a step. The new position of the end of the metacarpal bone was marked and the difference to the starting position was calculated. The mean value of three tries was recorded. The Functional Reach Test is a simple measurement of standing balance. Streched distance is the more longer the more better.

    Change from Functional Reach Test at one month

  • Change Sharpened Romberg

    Participants were asked to remain standing, on a straight line with one leg behind the other leg, leaving the arms sagging and without impairing the balance. Duration stop criteria were defined as the time it took a participant to dislocate the foot, reach the maximal duration of 30 sec, and contact the observer to avoid falling. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Change from Sharpened Romberg at one month

  • Change Single Leg Stance Test- Right

    Duration of standing was measured in participants standing with dangling arms. Maximal duration of test is 30 sec. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Change from Single Leg Stance Test- Right at one month

  • Change Single Leg Stance Test- Left

    Duration of standing was measured in participants standing with dangling arms. Maximal duration of test is 30 sec. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Change from Single Leg Stance Test- Left at one month

  • Change Joint of position sense

    Position sense was evaluated with Baseline digital goniometer. Extremity of participant is positioned to target angle and hold it there three seconds before returning to starting position. After returning to the starting position, participants attempted to repeat the previously attained angle. The measurements were repeated three times on both extremities (non-dominant and dominant) with a 30-second rest period separating trials. tests are carried out closed eyes for shoulder, ankle, knee. The angular difference is the more smaller the more better.

    Change from Joint of position sense at one month

Study Arms (2)

conventional group

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional group is received conventional rehabilitation program.

Other: classic rehabilitationOther: classic rehabilitation+mobilization

mobilization group

EXPERIMENTAL

Mobilization group is received cervical mobilization in addition to conventional rehabilitation program.

Other: classic rehabilitationOther: classic rehabilitation+mobilization

Interventions

The intervention is conventional rehabilitation that included streching, balance and coordination training. The intervention is applied to participants, manually.

Also known as: conventional rehabilitation
conventional groupmobilization group

Another intervention is manuel therapy that included gliding technics, rotational technics at cervical region. (in addition to classic rehabilitation). The intervention is applied to participants, manually.

Also known as: experimental rehabilitation
conventional groupmobilization group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was between 2-5,
  • According to the modified Ashworth Scale, spasticity is between 1 and 3,
  • EDSS Cerebellar System Sub-Scale, Functional System Score ˃1,
  • medical condition is stable and no medication changes were made in the last month,
  • Vertebro-basillar test negative,
  • Not have any other neurological disorder and orthopedic problem to prevent participation in this study
  • A score of at least 24 from the Mini Mental Test,

You may not qualify if:

  • presence of psychiatric or severe cognitive dysfunction,
  • pregnancy,
  • Having a neurological disease other than MS,
  • having had an attack in the last 3 months,
  • Botulinum toxin application within the last 6 months,
  • participating in physiotherapy program in the last 6 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hasan Kalyoncu University

Gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants are grouped randomly. First group and second group are applied different rehabilitation programs. Both of group is rest four weeks. Than second group is applied first group's rehabilitation program and first group is applied second group's rehabilitation program.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, clinical research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2019

First Posted

December 17, 2019

Study Start

January 7, 2020

Primary Completion

November 2, 2020

Study Completion

December 30, 2020

Last Updated

August 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-08

Locations