The Therapeutic Effects of Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy
EAP
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Equine-assisted interventions (EAI) are an emerging form of alternate psychotherapy that has been increasingly found to produce improvements in various treatment outcomes. However, the paucity of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) in the EAI literature prevents any definitive conclusions to be made about the general effectiveness of EAI. This study tests whether one form of EAI, Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), reduces aggression and alters risk factors associated with aggression in young adults, and whether emotion regulation mediates any effect of EAP on aggression. In a single-blind RCT, undergraduate students will be randomly assigned to either an intervention group, an active-control group, or a placebo-control group. Participants in the intervention group will undergo a 5-week EAP program consisting of structured, interactive activities with horses followed by a clinical processing component. Participants in the active control group will undergo a 5-week program that only involves interactions with horses without any clinical input (i.e. commonly coined as animal-assisted activities). Participants in the placebo-control group will undergo 5 weeks of 1-hour movie sessions related to horses. There will be three waves of data collection measuring key outcome variables - t1 before the 1st session, t2 after the 3rd session, and t3 after the final session. Participants will complete questionnaires assessing the key outcomes of aggression, emotional well-being and academic performance. Other risk factors of antisocial behaviour such as psychopathy, level of empathy, emotion regulation and executive functioning will also be measured. To the author's knowledge, the current study is the first in Singapore to investigate if EAP can lower aggression levels and alter psychological risk factors for aggression in healthy young adults. In turn, these results could help inform the utility and validity of EAP in the forensic populations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 6, 2020
CompletedMarch 3, 2021
March 1, 2021
3 months
December 11, 2019
March 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (18)
Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS)
Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS)
Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Young Adult Behavioral Scale (YABS)
Min. Value: 1 (never), Max. Value: 5 (always), higher scores indicate a higher likelihood in the domains of relational aggression, social aggression and interpersonal maturity.
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ)
Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ)
Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPQ)
Min. Value: 0 (never), Max. Value: 2 (often), higher scores indicate higher general aggression levels
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21)
Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21)
Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - 21 items (DASS-21)
Min. Value: 0 (did not apply to me at all), Max. Value: 3 (applied to me very much, or most of the time), higher scores indicate poorer emotional well-being
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Motivated strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ)
Min. Value: 1 (not at all true of me), Max. Value: 7 (very true of me), higher scores indicate greater motivations to learn using the different strategies
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Min. Value: 1 (strongly disagree), Max. Value: 7 (strongly agree), higher scores indicate greater likelihood of using the two types of emotion regulation strategies
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF)
Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF)
Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF)
Min. Value: 1 (almost never), Max. Value: 5 (almost always), higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotion regulation
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF)
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF)
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
Self-Report Psychotherapy - Short Form (SRP-SF)
Immediately after the 5th intervention session
Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES)
Immediately before the 1st intervention session
Cognitive, Affective and Somatic Empathy Scales (CASES)
Immediately after the 3rd intervention session
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention group will go through the 5-week EAP program consisting of the clinical processing following some activities found in EAP manuals.
Active-control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the active-control group will undergo a 5-week program that only involves interactions with horses without any clinical input (i.e. commonly coined as animal-assisted activities).
Placebo-control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants in the placebo-control group will undergo a 5-week movie screening of 1 hour each session that is related to horses.
Interventions
Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy (EAP) involves working on the psychological goals set between the client and the mental health professional. This is done through the experiential interactions between the clients and the horse. This experiential aspect is vital as it allows clients to process the emotions, thoughts and behaviors that were expressed during sessions with the horse.
Simple interactions with the horses that does not necessarily involve any goals being set between the client and the personnel handling the session. These can involve activities such as grooming or petting of the horse.
This group will only be watching movies related to horses and they are told that this is another form of EAP even though this is not the case. This type of intervention has not been known to provide any therapeutic effect relevant to the study and thus is used as the placebo-control.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Do not have any medical allergies or discomfort from interaction with horses.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who self-report an existing diagnosis for a psychological disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition: DSM-V
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chua Yi Rong Shawnlead
- Nanyang Technological Universitycollaborator
- Therapeutic and Educational Riding in Singapore (THERIS)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Therapeutic and Educational Riding in Singapore
Singapore, 286965, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivia Choy, PhD
Nanyang Technological University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lim SM Matthew, PhD, PsyD
National University of Singapore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are informed that they will be randomly assigned to either a EAP horse interaction group or a EAP horse movie group. They are told that this study is meant to investigate the outcomes of two different types of EAP. In actuality, there are 3 groups in total - one intervention and two control groups. Participants in the intervention and active-control group will be told that they are in the EAP horse interaction group whereas participants in the placebo-control group are told that they are in the EAP horse movie group.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Co-Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2019
First Posted
December 16, 2019
Study Start
January 20, 2020
Primary Completion
April 9, 2020
Study Completion
November 6, 2020
Last Updated
March 3, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plans for such sharing as of now.