Comparison of Two Exercise Training Modes on Left Myocardial Regional Function After Myocardial Infarction Evaluated by 2D Strain Ultrasound
STRAICT
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Ischemic cardiomyopathy, defined by a deficiency in oxygenation of the myocardium due to a narrowing of the coronary arteries, is a major problem for public health. Medicinally-treated or re-vascularized cardiovascular rehabilitation following myocardial infarction has shown undeniable benefits in decreasing the overall mortality rate (13-26%), cardiovascular mortality (26-36%) and morbidity, by controlling cardiovascular risk factors and improving tolerance to effort and consequently improving the quality of life. Since the integration of physical exercise into the rehabilitation programs of patients suffering from coronary disease in the mid-90s, and throughout the following decade, the exercise training program has mainly relied on moderately intense continuous exercises (CONT) the aim of which is to improve the aerobic capacity. These efforts typically consist of performing a submaximal exercise with an intensity of 50 to 80% of the maximum capacity for effort (established according to studies depending on the maximum or reserve heart rate or even peak power, measured when performing a first test, then a progressive and maximum test), and a constant duration (about 20 to 60 minutes). In the 2000s, under the aegis of Scandinavian teams, the intermittent mode (IT) appeared, characterized by alternating high intensity efforts of a short duration with active recuperation phases (Rognmo et al., 2004). Superiority of the IT mode over the CONT mode is generally observed on aerobic capacity for effort, usually gauged via the maximal oxygen consumption peak measured during a graded and maximum effort test. An important methodological bias in the comparison of the two modalities, within meta-analyses or even in the same randomized controlled trial, is the absence of control/pairing on the overall volume of training. At the present time, and to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies to compare the effects of CONT versus IT modes on the systolic or diastolic function of the myocardial region by 2D-strain following myocardial infarction. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of 2D strain scans upon inclusion and after 8 weeks of cardiovascular physiotherapy for 2 groups of patients benefiting from a CONT or IT program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 20, 2023
CompletedMarch 13, 2026
December 1, 2025
3.4 years
December 2, 2019
March 11, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Longitudinal systolic strain on Day 0.
All patients, whatever group they have been assigned to, will undergo a 2D Strain scan at the inclusion visit, before starting continuous (CONT) or intermittent (IT) cardiovascular rehabilitation.The overall longitudinal systolic strain (s-1) of the left ventricle will be measured (%) by echocardiography.
Day 0
Longitudinal systolic strain at Week 8.
All patients whatever group they have been assigned to will undergo a 2D Strain scan after undergoing 8 weeks continuous (CONT) or intermittent (IT) of cardiovascular physiotherapy.The overall longitudinal strain (s-1) of the left ventricle will be measured (%) by echocardiography.
Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (111)
Longitudinal diastolic strain on Day 0
D0
Longitudinal diastolic strain at Week 8
Week 8
Circumferential strain on Day 0
Day 0
Circumferential strain at Week 8
Week 8
Systolic radial strain on Day 0
Day 0
- +106 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patients following the CONT program
NO INTERVENTIONIn the " CONT continuous training" group, the control group, the patient benefits from a retraining program according to the continuous mode (see details in section 3.4) for 8 weeks, with three 40-minute sessions per week.
Patients following the IT program
EXPERIMENTALIn the "IT intermittent training group", group, (the experimental group), the patient benefits from a retraining program according to the intermittent mode (see details in section 3.4) for 8 weeks, with three 45-minute sessions per week.
Interventions
Patient benefits from an intermittent retraining program for 8 weeks, with three 45-minute sessions per week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patient must have given free informed consent and signed the consent form
- patient must be affiliated to or be covered by a health insurance scheme.
- patient must be an adult aged ≥ 18 to ≤ 75 years old.
- Patient must have had a first episode of myocardial infarction treated via medical treatment or by revascularization like a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (only if the patient has had complete revascularization) at least 6 weeks previously.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is participating in another intervention study or has taken part in another interventional study in the past 3 months
- The patient is often under curatorship, tutorship or advisorship.
- It is impossible to give the patient clear information
- The patient refuses to sign the consent form
- The patient is pregnant, about to give birth or breastfeeding
- The patient has a contraindication for retraining
- The patient has a prosthetic heart valve
- The patient has severe valve disorder
- The patient requires cardiac stimulation
- The patient has an automatic implantable defibrillator
- The patient has sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia or sinus arrhythmia
- The patient has non-controlled high blood pressure
- The patient has a ventricular ejection fraction \< 45%
- The patient has already participated in a cardiac rehabilitation program less than a year before
- The patient has a relapse of myocardial ischaemia during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Nîmes University Hospital
Nîmes, Gard, 30000, France
Clinique Lavarin, Centre de Rééducation Cardiaque,1 Rue Mère Térésa,
Avignon, Vaucluse, 84000, France
Related Publications (1)
Obert P, Nottin S, Belvisi C, Robert C, Miramont V, de France C, Carlioz R, Landrier JF, Poirier P, Dupeyron A. A comprehensive analysis of the impact of high-intensity interval vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on global and regional myocardial function in patients early after acute myocardial infarction - the STRAICT randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Mar 5:zwaf127. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf127. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 40042823RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arnaud DUPEYRON, Dr.
CHU de Nîmes (Nîmes University Hospital)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The evaluator will not know which group of patients the results are from.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 2, 2019
First Posted
December 9, 2019
Study Start
March 12, 2020
Primary Completion
July 20, 2023
Study Completion
July 20, 2023
Last Updated
March 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12