Radial Strain ECHO-Guided Implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
RAISE-CRT
Radial Strain Imaging-Guided Lead Placement for Improving Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
172
2 countries
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of radial strain imaging using speckle tracking analysis to predict the response to CRT in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) with NYHA functional class 2-4 heart failure and a standard guideline-based CRT indication. Thus assessing the value of lead localization determined by radial strain imaging in a prospective, randomized manner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 19, 2017
October 1, 2017
5.4 years
May 14, 2012
October 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Demonstrating Percent reduction in left ventricular end systolic (LVESV) at 6 months compared with baseline values.
To show that in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, implantation of a CRT LV lead guided by radial strain imaging results in a significantly greater echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy compared with conventional implantation techniques.
within 12 month from enrollment.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Clinical Improvement
Within 12 month from enrollment
Echocardiographic improvement
Within 12 month from enrollment
Improvement in wellbeing
Within 12 month from enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Echo guided implantation group
ACTIVE COMPARATOREcho guided implantation group Patients undergoing speckle tracking based LV lead implantation.
Conventional implantation group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients undergoing conventional LV lead implantation
Interventions
Lead placement according echo strain imaging result
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ischemic CMP based on evidence of prior MI by history, coronary angiography/revascularization or imaging
- AHA ACC or ESC EHRA Guideline-based indication (Class I or II) for CRT and NYHA class II-IV heart failure
- ECG wide QRS and :
- QRS \> 120 msec in NYHA III- IV
- CLBBB or QRS \> 150 in NYHA =II
- All must be candidates for De novo CRT-D implantation with LV lead via transvenous approach or patients previously implanted with pacemaker or ICD with \<20% pacing over the last three months who are undergoing CRT-D upgrade.
- Patient provides informed consent, tolerate a pectoral implant, agree to comply with the protocol, and maintain scheduled follow-up visits.
You may not qualify if:
- Permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation
- Advanced renal disease (Cr \>=2.5 mg/dL)
- Advanced comorbidities with life expectancy of \<1 year
- Patients on waiting list for heart transplantation
- Requiring intravenous amines (continuous or or intermittent amine drip therapy)
- Severe chronic pulmonary disease (simulating heart failure)
- Severe (untreated) organic mitral valve disease
- Poorly treated hypertension
- History of myocardial infarction \< 3 months; unstable angina \< 1m, CABG \<3 months; PCI \<3 months
- Mechanical TC valve
- Previously implanted CRT system
- Poorly visualized cardiac chamber dimensions in an echocardiogram performed prior to enrollment - please help us define
- Pregnancy or child-bearing potential in the absence of accepted forms of birth control
- Concurrent enrollment in other study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sheba Medical Centerlead
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centercollaborator
- Rabin Medical Centercollaborator
- Rambam Health Care Campuscollaborator
- Kaplan Medical Centercollaborator
- Soroka University Medical Centercollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Barzilai Medical Center
Ashkelon, Israel
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, Israel
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, Israel
Shaare Zedek
Jerusalem, Israel
Rabin Medical Center
Petah Tikva, Israel
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, Israel
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot, Israel
Sorasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Israel
Related Publications (12)
Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Gorcsan J 3rd. Echocardiography, dyssynchrony, and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2326-37. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq263. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
PMID: 20709721BACKGROUNDMiyazaki C, Redfield MM, Powell BD, Lin GM, Herges RM, Hodge DO, Olson LJ, Hayes DL, Espinosa RE, Rea RF, Bruce CJ, Nelson SM, Miller FA, Oh JK. Dyssynchrony indices to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive prospective single-center study. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Sep;3(5):565-73. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.848085. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
PMID: 20647479BACKGROUNDChung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, Abraham WT, Ghio S, Leclercq C, Bax JJ, Yu CM, Gorcsan J 3rd, St John Sutton M, De Sutter J, Murillo J. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008 May 20;117(20):2608-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743120. Epub 2008 May 5.
PMID: 18458170BACKGROUNDDelgado V, van Bommel RJ, Bertini M, Borleffs CJ, Marsan NA, Arnold CT, Nucifora G, van de Veire NR, Ypenburg C, Boersma E, Holman ER, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2011 Jan 4;123(1):70-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.945345. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
PMID: 21173353BACKGROUNDBecker M, Hoffmann R, Kuhl HP, Grawe H, Katoh M, Kramann R, Bucker A, Hanrath P, Heussen N. Analysis of myocardial deformation based on ultrasonic pixel tracking to determine transmurality in chronic myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2560-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl288. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
PMID: 17035253BACKGROUNDDelgado V, Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Tops LF, Mollema SA, Marsan NA, Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 May 20;51(20):1944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.040.
PMID: 18482662BACKGROUNDTanaka H, Nesser HJ, Buck T, Oyenuga O, Janosi RA, Winter S, Saba S, Gorcsan J 3rd. Dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking echocardiography and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the Speckle Tracking and Resynchronization (STAR) study. Eur Heart J. 2010 Jul;31(14):1690-700. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq213. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
PMID: 20530502BACKGROUNDKirn B, Jansen A, Bracke F, van Gelder B, Arts T, Prinzen FW. Mechanical discoordination rather than dyssynchrony predicts reverse remodeling upon cardiac resynchronization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Aug;295(2):H640-6. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00106.2008. Epub 2008 May 30.
PMID: 18515652BACKGROUNDWang CL, Wu CT, Yeh YH, Wu LS, Chang CJ, Ho WJ, Hsu LA, Luqman N, Kuo CT. Recoordination rather than resynchronization predicts reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jun;23(6):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.012. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
PMID: 20418055BACKGROUNDWang CL, Powell BD, Redfield MM, Miyazaki C, Fine NM, Olson LJ, Cha YM, Espinosa RE, Hayes DL, Hodge DO, Lin G, Friedman PA, Oh JK. Left ventricular discoordination index measured by speckle tracking strain rate imaging predicts reverse remodelling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 May;14(5):517-25. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs025. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
PMID: 22411692BACKGROUNDSung RK, Foster E. Assessment of systolic dyssynchrony for cardiac resynchronization therapy is not clinically useful. Circulation. 2011 Feb 15;123(6):656-62. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.954420. No abstract available.
PMID: 21321181BACKGROUNDKindermann M, Frohlig G, Doerr T, Schieffer H. Optimizing the AV delay in DDD pacemaker patients with high degree AV block: mitral valve Doppler versus impedance cardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Oct;20(10 Pt 1):2453-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06085.x.
PMID: 9358487BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ilan Goldenberg, Prof.
The Israeli Society for the Prevention of Heart Attacks
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Glikson, Prof.
Sheba Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul Friedman, Prof.
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Michael Glikson, MD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2012
First Posted
May 22, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10