NCT04177979

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the impact of near-assisted learning (NAL) on first-year medical students' objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) grades in a problem-based learning (PBL) environment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 6, 2019

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 16, 2019

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

24 days

First QC Date

November 16, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Near-assisted learningCostEducation environmentOSCEProblem-based learning

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) Score

    After the sessions, the study sample participated in the final osce exam. Their scores were compared. The minimum value was 0 while the maximum value was 100. The higher the score the better students had performed

    Less than a month

Study Arms (2)

Near assisted learning group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm were supervised by the trained peer-instructors.

Behavioral: Near-assisted learning through trained peers

Self directed learning group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in this arm were practicing independently. They were not supervised by any instructors.

Interventions

Students randomly allocated to this group were overseen during sessions by trained peer instructors.

Near assisted learning group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsOnly males were recruited, due to sociocultural restrictions in Saudi Arabia
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • st year medical students.
  • Medical students of Sulaiman Alrajhi Colleges.
  • Males.

You may not qualify if:

  • Students of other academic levels.
  • st year medical students of other universities.
  • Females.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sulaiman AlRajhi Colleges

Al Bukairiyah, Al-Qassim Region, 51941, PO Box 777, Saudi Arabia

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Hoiby P, Muller CG, Ringsted C. Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):553-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701682550.

  • Shah I, Mahboob U, Shah S. Effectiveness Of Horizontal Peer-Assisted Learning In Physical Examination Performance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):559-565.

  • Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination? BMC Med Educ. 2013 Dec 11;13:165. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-165.

  • Riaz I. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):825-9.

  • Haist SA, Wilson JF, Brigham NL, Fosson SE, Blue AV. Comparing fourth-year medical students with faculty in the teaching of physical examination skills to first-year students. Acad Med. 1998 Feb;73(2):198-200. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199802000-00020.

  • Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007 Apr;41(4):411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02713.x.

  • Tai JH, Canny BJ, Haines TP, Molloy EK. The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: opportunities in clinical medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Aug;21(3):659-76. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0. Epub 2015 Dec 12.

  • Liew SC, Sow CF, Sidhu J, Nadarajah VD. The near-peer tutoring programme: embracing the 'doctors-to-teach' philosophy--a comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors. Med Educ Online. 2015 Sep 8;20:27959. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.27959. eCollection 2015.

  • Tai J, Molloy E, Haines T, Canny B. Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review. Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):469-84. doi: 10.1111/medu.12898.

  • Khaw C, Raw L. The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 12;7:188-94. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b.

  • Cole JD, Ruble MJ, Donnelly J, Groves B. Peer-assisted Learning: Clinical Skills Training for Pharmacy Students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Aug;82(6):6511. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6511.

  • Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M. Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):577-82. doi: 10.1080/01421590701469867.

  • Silbert BI, Lake FR. Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):392-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668240. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Related Links

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The OSCE assessors were blinded
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized single blinded trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of medical education department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2019

First Posted

November 26, 2019

Study Start

April 6, 2019

Primary Completion

April 30, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

November 26, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Might be shared through the university webpage.

Locations