NCT04176406

Brief Summary

This is an administrative supplement to an existing project "Using fMRI-guided TMS to increase central executive function in older adults: NCT02767323" This award allows extending our existing fMRI-TMS paradigm to patients with a prodromal form of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) known as amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and investigate the role of brain health factors in mediating the TMS-related memory performance benefits associated with communication between a network of frontoparietal brain regions in these populations. The focus on focal neurostimulation at only a single site represents a fundamental gap in the approach of memory-based neurostimulation therapies. Neurostimulation affects multiple sites within a cortical network, but these global effects have not been used as targets for stimulation because of limited knowledge about what influence these localized sites have on global changes in brain state. To address this problem, multimodal neuroimaging tools and network modeling approaches developed though the parent U01 project will be used, to demonstrate how focal neurostimulation improves the efficacy of TMS for enhancing memory function. These goals will be addressed in the Administrative Supplement under our two specific aims. First, network-guided TMS will be applied to optimize memory success based in the frontoparietal network (FPN) in a new group of MCI patients. A new form of TMS targeting that involves modeling of the global network to understand how the controllability of a stimulation site evokes changes in widespread brain networks will be tested. Second, structural and functional factors affecting the efficacy of individualized network-guided TMS will be identified to ameliorate deficits in MCI. By creating a multimodal model of neural deficits related to MCI, network-guided TMS will be adjusted to demonstrate how the MCI brain might compensate for these neural deficits. The parent U01 project has made foundational advances towards these goals, as we have demonstrated the ability of to selectively enhance and reduce working memory performance in healthy older adults. In the current Administrative Supplement this paradigm will be extended to a group of MCI participants in order to test the hypothesis that excitatory rTMS to the working memory network can provide positive outcomes for patients with pre-clinical AD. The proposed work will provide an important tool for studying the stability and controllability of network connectivity of memory states in the aging brain, as well as new information on the effectiveness of brain stimulation technologies as a therapeutic approach for cognitive decline.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2019

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 25, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 25, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2020

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 11, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 27, 2021

Status Verified

January 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 20, 2019

Results QC Date

December 11, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 8, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Accuracy (in Percentage)

    Accuracy (in percentage) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS.

    Through study completion, an average of one year

  • Acute Effect of a rTMS Session on the Performance for a Working Memory Task, as Measured by Reaction Times (ms)

    Reaction times (in ms) will be assessed to evaluate the acute effect of rTMS

    Through study completion an average of one year

Study Arms (4)

rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network, defined via network analysis.

Device: rTMS

Sham rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal network

SHAM COMPARATOR

electrical sham coil applied over a node within the fronto-parietal network.

Device: Sham rTMS

rTMS over the DLPFC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be applied over the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex showing the strongest fMRI activation.

Device: rTMS

Sham rTMS over the DLPFC

SHAM COMPARATOR

electrical sham coil applied over the DLPFC.

Device: Sham rTMS

Interventions

rTMSDEVICE

excitatory 5Hz rTMS will be used

rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal networkrTMS over the DLPFC
Sham rTMSDEVICE

an electrical sham coil reproducing the same clicking sound and tactile sensation than the active rTMS will be used

Sham rTMS over a node within the fronto-parietal networkSham rTMS over the DLPFC

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • English Speaking
  • willing to provide consent
  • signed HIPAA authorization

You may not qualify if:

  • History of any I DSM IV disorder that is unstable or untreated
  • current or past history of substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine)
  • women who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysms clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes
  • increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of epilepsy, seizure disorder, increased intracranial pressure, or history of significant head trauma greater than mild concussion (History of significant head trauma, including with loss of consciousness for ≥ 30 minutes, alteration of consciousness for up to 24 hours following the event, or post-traumatic amnesia) in the past 10yrs or head injury received after age 65
  • Neurological disorder including, but not limited to: space occupying brain lesion; any history of seizures, history of cerebrovascular accident; cerebral aneurysm , Dementia, Huntington chorea, multiple sclerosis
  • Increased risk of seizure for any reason, including prior diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure (such as after large infarctions or trauma), or currently taking medication that are on the strong potential hazard list for rTMS.
  • Subjects taking medications with an ACB score of 3.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Dysfunction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Lawrence G. Appelbaum
Organization
Duke University

Study Officials

  • Lawrence G Appelbaum

    Duke University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Posted

November 25, 2019

Study Start

November 25, 2019

Primary Completion

February 27, 2020

Study Completion

February 27, 2020

Last Updated

January 27, 2021

Results First Posted

January 11, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations