Nudging Healthcare Organizations to Adopt New Care Delivery Practices
Accelerating the Use of Evidence-based Innovation in Health Care Systems
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,387
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This two-arm, parallel group randomized controlled trial will assess the impact of written social norms messaging (i.e., behavioral 'nudges') on healthcare organization administrators' decision to access online resources that support the adoption of evidence-based healthcare delivery practices. The healthcare delivery practices include the use of population screening tools, clinical practice guidelines, and shared decision making training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 9, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 8, 2020
CompletedJune 26, 2020
June 1, 2020
2 months
November 14, 2019
June 24, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of participants who access the technical assistance resource webpage
The percentage of participants who access the technical assistance webpage will be determined by email and webpage analytics. The primary analysis will be intention to treat (i.e., among all participants sent a letter); a secondary analysis will be a 'per protocol' analysis (i.e., among all participants whose letter was not sent back as undeliverable). Exploratory sub-group analyses will be conducted by each strata characteristic (e.g., whether organization category influences the likelihood of accessing the webpage).
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of unique resource views on technical assistance resource webpage
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
Percentage of participants who request connection to peer organizations via the technical assistance resource webpage
Up to 2 months after letter is sent
Perceived effect of letter on administrators' intentions
Up to 4 months after letter is sent
Study Arms (2)
Nudge Letter
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a letter that highlights their performance vs. peer organizations on up to seven care delivery practices featured in the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS). The letter includes a link to access technical assistance resources and is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS respondent report.
Control Letter
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants receive a letter with a link to technical assistance resources; the letter is sent alongside the participant's NSHOS survey respondent report.
Interventions
This group will receive a letter noting that their organization has not implemented at least one common care delivery practice that a majority their peers have already implemented. The letter will also note the percentage of peer organizations that have implemented the practice. This is done using peer comparison data and social norms messaging.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had not implemented at least one of up to seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)
You may not qualify if:
- Did not respond to NSHOS survey
- Participant responded to NSHOS survey and reported that their organization had already implemented each of seven pre-determined care delivery practices, out of the following eight practices featured in the NSHOS: Screening for opioid use specifically; Screening for substance use disorders; Screening for depression; Screening for interpersonal violence; Method for identifying high-cost patients; Use of evidence-based guidelines for congestive heart failure; Use of evidence-based guidelines for sepsis (included in letters to healthcare system administrators, but not hospitals or physician practices); Training for shared decision making (included in letters to hospitals and physician practices but not healthcare systems)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amber E Barnato, MD, MPH, MS
Dartmouth College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Health Policy and Clinical Practice and of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2019
First Posted
November 25, 2019
Study Start
December 9, 2019
Primary Completion
February 9, 2020
Study Completion
June 8, 2020
Last Updated
June 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share