Mobilization With Movement Versus Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Comparison of Mobilization With Movement and Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study intends to determine the effects of MWM verses Mulligan knee taping on patellofemoral pain syndrome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 20, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
4 months
November 20, 2019
January 14, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Baseline
Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Post 2nd week
Time up and Go test
Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.
Post 6 week
Active knee extension test
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Baseline
Active knee extension test:(2nd week)
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Post 2nd Week
Active knee extension test:(6 week)
Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.
Post 6th Week
Sit and reach Test
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Baseline
Sit and reach Test
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Post 2nd week
Sit and reach Test( 6 week)
Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.
Post 6th Week
Secondary Outcomes (6)
NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Baseline
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 2nd week]
Post 2nd week
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 6th week ]
Post 6th Week
Kujala pain Rating score:(Baseline)
Baseline
Kujala pain Rating scale : (2nd week)
Post 2nd week
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
MWM Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive Mobilization with Movement (MWM) i.e. straight leg raised with traction,Tibial Gliding
Mulligan Taping Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive Mulligan knee taping
Interventions
patients with group 1 will receive two techniques pertaining to MWM intervention (straight leg raised with traction and tibial Gliding) Repeat it 10 times,3 sets and 1 mint interval. .For Tibial Gliding we will asks the patient to perform 10 repetitive active knee extensions. Practice will be performed by doing 10 reps for 3 sets with 1 min interval. After this home exercises will b guided stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold, strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets
patient with group 2 will receive Mulligan taping technique. Tape will be applied for two days then we will change it. After this home based exercise will be guided which is stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold , strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pain scoring three or more according to Numeric pain Rating scale (NPRS) during at least two activities
- Age between 20 and 45 years
- Both Genders
You may not qualify if:
- Past history of total knee artthroplasty
- Intra articular steroid injection
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Use of Assistive devices e.g. canes, walkers and braces
- Knee injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pakistan Railway hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 40100, Pakistan
Related Publications (3)
Demirci S, Kinikli GI, Callaghan MJ, Tunay VB. Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
PMID: 29054803BACKGROUNDHickey A, Hopper D, Hall T, Wild CY. The Effect of the Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain and Lower Limb Biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1179-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629418. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
PMID: 26903215BACKGROUNDCallaghan MJ, Selfe J. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD006717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006717.pub2.
PMID: 22513943BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huma Riaz, PHD*
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- This study will be single blinded randomized control trail, participants will be unaware of treatment groups, they will be randomly allocated through sealed envelope method.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2019
First Posted
November 22, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 20, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share