NCT04173468

Brief Summary

This study intends to determine the effects of MWM verses Mulligan knee taping on patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 20, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2019

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 20, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Time up and Go test

    Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.

    Baseline

  • Time up and Go test

    Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.

    Post 2nd week

  • Time up and Go test

    Patients were asked to perform test at usual walking speed .initial testing standardized verbal instruction given to the participant regarding procedure. For performing TUG participants were instructed to walk three meter and then walk back to sit down .Note time on stopwatch .The average of tests trail was measured as the mean of TUG.

    Post 6 week

  • Active knee extension test

    Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.

    Baseline

  • Active knee extension test:(2nd week)

    Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.

    Post 2nd Week

  • Active knee extension test:(6 week)

    Active knee extension test (AKE), is used to assess hamstring length. It was performed while the participant was in supine lying and involved leg was in 90 degree hip flexion. Then participant was asked to extend the knee. For hamstring tightness cut off score AKE angle is 160°. Therefore normal individuals with angle \< 160° were considered as individuals with hamstring tightness. Its reliability is 0.94.

    Post 6th Week

  • Sit and reach Test

    Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.

    Baseline

  • Sit and reach Test

    Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.

    Post 2nd week

  • Sit and reach Test( 6 week)

    Sit and reach test (SRT) is most commonly employed test to measure hamstring flexibility. This tool is used to measure range of hamstring muscle at knee joint.Each participant was instructed to sits on a couch in long sitting position. participants were seated with elongated legs, with hip flexed to 90 degrees and knees were fully extended and the ankles were in relaxed plantar flexion. A measuring ruler/tape was placed,between the feet with 38 cm score was marked tangent to the sole of the feet. Subjects were asked to reach forward with hands one above the other and palms of the hands facing down, while attempting to touch fingertips to toes or as far beyond on measuring tape while keeping the knees straight.

    Post 6th Week

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • NPRS Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Baseline

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 2nd week]

    Post 2nd week

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) [ 6th week ]

    Post 6th Week

  • Kujala pain Rating score:(Baseline)

    Baseline

  • Kujala pain Rating scale : (2nd week)

    Post 2nd week

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MWM Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will receive Mobilization with Movement (MWM) i.e. straight leg raised with traction,Tibial Gliding

Other: Moblization with Movement

Mulligan Taping Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will receive Mulligan knee taping

Other: Mulligan knee taping

Interventions

patients with group 1 will receive two techniques pertaining to MWM intervention (straight leg raised with traction and tibial Gliding) Repeat it 10 times,3 sets and 1 mint interval. .For Tibial Gliding we will asks the patient to perform 10 repetitive active knee extensions. Practice will be performed by doing 10 reps for 3 sets with 1 min interval. After this home exercises will b guided stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold, strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets

MWM Group

patient with group 2 will receive Mulligan taping technique. Tape will be applied for two days then we will change it. After this home based exercise will be guided which is stretching of hamstrings 8 to 10 reps 20 sec hold , strengthening of Quadriceps and VMO with 10 reps and 3 sets.

Mulligan Taping Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pain scoring three or more according to Numeric pain Rating scale (NPRS) during at least two activities
  • Age between 20 and 45 years
  • Both Genders

You may not qualify if:

  • Past history of total knee artthroplasty
  • Intra articular steroid injection
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Use of Assistive devices e.g. canes, walkers and braces
  • Knee injury

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pakistan Railway hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 40100, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Demirci S, Kinikli GI, Callaghan MJ, Tunay VB. Comparison of short-term effects of mobilization with movement and Kinesiotaping on pain, function and balance in patellofemoral pain. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Dec;51(6):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

    PMID: 29054803BACKGROUND
  • Hickey A, Hopper D, Hall T, Wild CY. The Effect of the Mulligan Knee Taping Technique on Patellofemoral Pain and Lower Limb Biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1179-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629418. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

    PMID: 26903215BACKGROUND
  • Callaghan MJ, Selfe J. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;2012(4):CD006717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006717.pub2.

    PMID: 22513943BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Interventions

Movement

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Huma Riaz, PHD*

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
This study will be single blinded randomized control trail, participants will be unaware of treatment groups, they will be randomly allocated through sealed envelope method.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: There will be two groups of participant. One group will receive MWM along with conventional therapy and the second group group will receive Mulligan knee taping along with conventional therapy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2019

First Posted

November 22, 2019

Study Start

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion

December 20, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

January 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations