Comparing the Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping and Knee Orthosis in Patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of kinesio taping treatment and knee orthosis treatment in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFAS). 54 patients were included in the study and the patients were divided into 3 groups as kinesio taping group (KTG) (n=18), orthotics group (OG) (n=18) and control group (CG) (n=18). A progressive exercise program was applied to all groups and patients were treated 2 days a week for 6 weeks.While kinesio taping was applied to KTG in each session, knee orthosis was given to OG and they were asked to use it for 6 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Kujala Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and isokinetic strength test (IST) were used in the evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2023
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.4 years
July 3, 2023
September 12, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in baseline Kujala scores of patients treated at week 6
It is a score that evaluates symptoms and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Patients were asked to complete this score before starting the treatment and again at the end of the 6-week treatment.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in baseline Visual Analogue Scale of patients treated at week 6
6 weeks
Change in baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of patients treated at week 6
6 weeks
Change in baseline isokinetic strength test of patients treated at week 6
6 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Kinesio taping group
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to the standard exercise program, kinesio taping was applied to the knee for 6 weeks.
Orthosis group
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to the standard exercise program, they were asked to use a knee orthosis for 6 weeks.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORA standard exercise program was applied for 6 weeks.
Interventions
A corrective kinesio taping was applied to the patellofemoral joint for the knee. In addition, exercise therapy was taken.
They were asked to use a knee orthosis for a minimum of 6 hours a day. They also received exercise therapy.
An exercise program focused on the knee and hip muscles was given two days a week.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between the ages of 18-45
- Patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 29.9
- Anterior knee pain defined as 3 points on the 10 cm Visual Analogue Scale when performing at least two activities of sitting for a long time, climbing/descending stairs, squatting, running and jumping
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with knee osteoarthritis
- History of surgery involving the lower extremity
- Patellar or quadriceps tendinopathy
- Injury to the meniscus or knee ligaments
- Patients showing an allergic response to kinesio tape
- Patients previously treated with PFAS
- Existing hip pathologies
- History of patellar subluxation or dislocation
- Patients with neurological disorders
- Patients who did not fill out the voluntary consent form
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34815, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Yunus Özdemir, MSc
Medipol University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2023
First Posted
August 16, 2023
Study Start
December 9, 2021
Primary Completion
May 5, 2023
Study Completion
June 16, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share