NCT04163367

Brief Summary

One of the most important responsibilities for the social services is to investigate suspected child abuse and to offer suitable intervention for the families. The lack of published studies on the effect of such interventions is therefore noteworthy. Globally, few controlled studies have been published and none of them have been conducted in Sweden. To better guide the social services in the selection of interventions, the need for Swedish studies with experimental design is therefore apparent. Previous experience in using manualized interventions with families within the social services points to the importance of regarding issues of implementation and dissemination. Interventions need to be developed and adjusted to optimize the chance of engaging families that often live under strong social pressure. The interventions also need to be designed to enable implementation and sustainability in regular services. Safer Kids is a manualized intervention offered to caregivers under investigation for child abuse. The intervention was developed by the City of Stockholm in cooperation with practitioners within the social services. The content is based on the established parenting program Comet, but has been adjusted to suit the target group. Safer Kids has already been offered for a couple of years within the social services, but has not yet been evaluated. In this project, a study of intervention effects will be conducted. Caregivers will be randomized to either receive Intervention as usual (IAU), or IAU plus Safer Kids. Effects on established risk-factors for child abuse, as well as the abused childrens' experiences, will be measures. Information on additional reports to the social services on child abuse will be collected, up to 30 month after the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

30 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2019

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 14, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 15, 2019

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

October 25, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ParentingRandomized controlled trialParent-Child relationsSocial servicesPrevention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (B-CAP)

    A short version of the well established CAP, which measures empirically established risk-factors for child abuse. The short version includes 24 items.

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month), Follow-up (7 month), long-term follow-up (18 and 30 month)

  • Change in Journal records: further reports on abuse or violence

    On four occasions, personnel at the included social services units will extract information from the participating families journal records. The data that will be collected by the research team is: number of additional reports to the social services concerning the family, the date of each report, as well as the reason for each report.

    4-months, 7-months, 18-months and 30-months from baseline.

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Change in Parent Anger Scale (PAS)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)

  • Change in Perceived stress scale (PSS)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)

  • Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)

  • Change in The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month), Follow-up (7 month), long-term follow-up (18 and 30 month)

  • Change in Kindl-R

    Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Safer Kids Manual Adherence Rating Scale

    After completion of Safer Kids

  • Therapist Background Survey

    After starting or completing treatment with first study family

Study Arms (2)

Intervention as usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The social services standard process for families reported for violence or abuse towards children. The standard process always includes a formal investigation of the suspected violence/abuse. The investigation may or may not result in voluntary or mandatory interventions, such as family support or parent training.

Other: Intervention as usual (IAU)

Intervention as usual + Safer Kids

EXPERIMENTAL

The procedure in this arm is exactly the same as in the active comparator arm (i.e., investigation that may be followed by interventions). In addition, the general parent training program Safer Kids is offered during the investigation to all participants in this arm.

Behavioral: Safer KidsOther: Intervention as usual (IAU)

Interventions

Safer KidsBEHAVIORAL

A behaviorally based parent training program with the purpose to reduce or prevent child abuse.

Intervention as usual + Safer Kids

Everything that's included in the social service units' regular handling of cases; such as the formal investigation and family treatment. The units cannot offer Safer Kids as a part of IAU.

Intervention as usualIntervention as usual + Safer Kids

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • At least one adult residing in the family is suspected to have perpetrated an abusive act towards a child.
  • The social services has decided to start a formal investigation of the suspected act.
  • At least one child in the family is between 3 and 12 years old.

You may not qualify if:

  • The social services already has an ongoing intervention with the family at the time when the suspected act is reported.
  • REVISED CRITERIA (n = 101 included according to):
  • At least one adult in the family is suspected to have perpetrated an abusive act towards a child, resulting in an initiated child welfare investigation.
  • The suspected adult lives with the child, at least part time, during the investigation
  • At least one child in the family is between 2-12 years old.
  • The events preceding the report does not concern the child between 2-12 years old, only a younger or older sibling
  • The participating caregivers have participated in an intervention concerning abuse of children at the social services in the past 12 months
  • Caregiver and focus child lack residence permit the coming 30 months
  • The family's problem are assessed to be so severe that there is great risk of out-of-home placement of the child during the investigation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (30)

Alingsås kommun

Alingsås, Alingsås, 44181, Sweden

Location

Bjuvs kommun

Bjuv, Bjuv, 267 25, Sweden

Location

Danderyds kommun

Djursholm, Djursholm, 182 05, Sweden

Location

Fagersta kommun

Fagersta, Fagersta, 737 80, Sweden

Location

Gislaveds kommun

Gislaved, Gislaved, 332 36, Sweden

Location

Gävle kommun

Gävle, Gävle, 801 84, Sweden

Location

Hudiksvalls kommun

Hudiksvall, Hudiksvall, 824 80, Sweden

Location

Hörby kommun

Hörby, Hörby, 242 80, Sweden

Location

Höörs kommun

Höör, Höör, 243 31, Sweden

Location

Katrineholms kommun

Katrineholm, Katrineholm, 641 80, Sweden

Location

Lerums kommun

Lerum, Lerum, 443 80, Sweden

Location

Luleå kommun

Luleå, Luleå, 971 85, Sweden

Location

Mönsterås kommun

Mönsterås, Mönsterås, 383 22, Sweden

Location

Skara kommun

Skara, Skara, 532 88, Sweden

Location

Skellefteå kommun

Skellefteå, Skellefteå, 931 85, Sweden

Location

Staffanstorps kommun

Staffanstorp, Staffanstorp, 245 80, Sweden

Location

Stenungsunds kommun

Stenungsund, Stenungsund, 444 82, Sweden

Location

Sundbybergs stad

Sundbyberg, Sundbyberg, 172 92, Sweden

Location

Sundsvalls kommun

Sundsvall, Sundsvall, 851 85, Sweden

Location

Söderhamns kommun

Söderhamn, Söderhamn, 826 80, Sweden

Location

Södertälje kommun

Södertälje, Södertälje, 151 89, Sweden

Location

Tidaholms kommun

Tidaholm, Tidaholm, 522 83, Sweden

Location

Botkyrka kommun

Tumba, Tumba, 147 85, Sweden

Location

Täby kommun

Täby, Täby, 183 80, Sweden

Location

Uppsala kommun

Uppsala, Uppsala County, 753 75, Sweden

Location

Vellinge kommun

Vellinge, Vellinge, 235 81, Sweden

Location

Lidingö kommun

Lidingö, Sweden

Location

Ronneby kommun

Ronneby, Sweden

Location

Österåkers kommun

Åkersberga, Åkersberga, 184 86, Sweden

Location

Örebro kommun

Örebro, Örebro County, 70135, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Annerback EM, Wingren G, Svedin CG, Gustafsson PA. Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse in Sweden - findings from a population-based youth survey. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Aug;99(8):1229-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01792.x. Epub 2010 Mar 8.

    PMID: 20219025BACKGROUND
  • Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH, Alink LR. Cultural-geographical differences in the occurrence of child physical abuse? A meta-analysis of global prevalence. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(2):81-94. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.697165.

    PMID: 23597008BACKGROUND
  • Norman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

    PMID: 23209385BACKGROUND
  • Euser S, Alink LR, Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 18;15:1068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2387-9.

    PMID: 26476980BACKGROUND
  • Vlahovicova K, Melendez-Torres GJ, Leijten P, Knerr W, Gardner F. Parenting Programs for the Prevention of Child Physical Abuse Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Sep;20(3):351-365. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0232-7.

    PMID: 28378136BACKGROUND
  • Kling A, Forster M, Sundell K, Melin L. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behav Ther. 2010 Dec;41(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PMID: 21035616BACKGROUND
  • Stattin H, Enebrink P, Ozdemir M, Giannotta F. A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1037/a0039328. Epub 2015 May 25.

    PMID: 26009784BACKGROUND
  • Chen M, Chan KL. Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jan;17(1):88-104. doi: 10.1177/1524838014566718. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

    PMID: 25573846BACKGROUND
  • Lundahl BW, Nimer J, Parsons B. Preventing Child Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Parent Training Programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(3): 251-262, doi: 10.1177/1049731505284391. Epub 2006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

    PMID: 19897823BACKGROUND
  • van Leuven L, Enebrink P, Ghaderi A, Sorjonen K, Lalouni M, Forster M. A randomized controlled trial of Safer Kids - A program for parents reported for child abuse: Short-term effects on further reports of child abuse and related risk factors. Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Sep;143:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106329. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Methods

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Martin Forster, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are randomized to the control condition (intervention as usual) or the experimental condition (intervention as usual + Safer Kids - manualized parent training)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2019

First Posted

November 14, 2019

Study Start

November 15, 2019

Primary Completion

June 1, 2024

Study Completion

June 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations