A Randomized Controlled Study of Safer Kids: A Manualized Intervention to Prevent Child Abuse
Can Children be Protected Against Violence and Violations From Parents? A Randomized Controlled Study of Safer Kids: A Manualized Intervention to Prevent Child Abuse
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
30
Brief Summary
One of the most important responsibilities for the social services is to investigate suspected child abuse and to offer suitable intervention for the families. The lack of published studies on the effect of such interventions is therefore noteworthy. Globally, few controlled studies have been published and none of them have been conducted in Sweden. To better guide the social services in the selection of interventions, the need for Swedish studies with experimental design is therefore apparent. Previous experience in using manualized interventions with families within the social services points to the importance of regarding issues of implementation and dissemination. Interventions need to be developed and adjusted to optimize the chance of engaging families that often live under strong social pressure. The interventions also need to be designed to enable implementation and sustainability in regular services. Safer Kids is a manualized intervention offered to caregivers under investigation for child abuse. The intervention was developed by the City of Stockholm in cooperation with practitioners within the social services. The content is based on the established parenting program Comet, but has been adjusted to suit the target group. Safer Kids has already been offered for a couple of years within the social services, but has not yet been evaluated. In this project, a study of intervention effects will be conducted. Caregivers will be randomized to either receive Intervention as usual (IAU), or IAU plus Safer Kids. Effects on established risk-factors for child abuse, as well as the abused childrens' experiences, will be measures. Information on additional reports to the social services on child abuse will be collected, up to 30 month after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedMay 20, 2025
May 1, 2025
4.5 years
October 25, 2019
May 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Brief Child Abuse Potential Inventory (B-CAP)
A short version of the well established CAP, which measures empirically established risk-factors for child abuse. The short version includes 24 items.
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month), Follow-up (7 month), long-term follow-up (18 and 30 month)
Change in Journal records: further reports on abuse or violence
On four occasions, personnel at the included social services units will extract information from the participating families journal records. The data that will be collected by the research team is: number of additional reports to the social services concerning the family, the date of each report, as well as the reason for each report.
4-months, 7-months, 18-months and 30-months from baseline.
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change in Parent Anger Scale (PAS)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)
Change in Perceived stress scale (PSS)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)
Change in The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month), Follow-up (7 month), long-term follow-up (18 and 30 month)
Change in Kindl-R
Pre (0 month), Post (4 month) and Follow-up (7 month)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Safer Kids Manual Adherence Rating Scale
After completion of Safer Kids
Therapist Background Survey
After starting or completing treatment with first study family
Study Arms (2)
Intervention as usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe social services standard process for families reported for violence or abuse towards children. The standard process always includes a formal investigation of the suspected violence/abuse. The investigation may or may not result in voluntary or mandatory interventions, such as family support or parent training.
Intervention as usual + Safer Kids
EXPERIMENTALThe procedure in this arm is exactly the same as in the active comparator arm (i.e., investigation that may be followed by interventions). In addition, the general parent training program Safer Kids is offered during the investigation to all participants in this arm.
Interventions
A behaviorally based parent training program with the purpose to reduce or prevent child abuse.
Everything that's included in the social service units' regular handling of cases; such as the formal investigation and family treatment. The units cannot offer Safer Kids as a part of IAU.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least one adult residing in the family is suspected to have perpetrated an abusive act towards a child.
- The social services has decided to start a formal investigation of the suspected act.
- At least one child in the family is between 3 and 12 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- The social services already has an ongoing intervention with the family at the time when the suspected act is reported.
- REVISED CRITERIA (n = 101 included according to):
- At least one adult in the family is suspected to have perpetrated an abusive act towards a child, resulting in an initiated child welfare investigation.
- The suspected adult lives with the child, at least part time, during the investigation
- At least one child in the family is between 2-12 years old.
- The events preceding the report does not concern the child between 2-12 years old, only a younger or older sibling
- The participating caregivers have participated in an intervention concerning abuse of children at the social services in the past 12 months
- Caregiver and focus child lack residence permit the coming 30 months
- The family's problem are assessed to be so severe that there is great risk of out-of-home placement of the child during the investigation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (30)
Alingsås kommun
Alingsås, Alingsås, 44181, Sweden
Bjuvs kommun
Bjuv, Bjuv, 267 25, Sweden
Danderyds kommun
Djursholm, Djursholm, 182 05, Sweden
Fagersta kommun
Fagersta, Fagersta, 737 80, Sweden
Gislaveds kommun
Gislaved, Gislaved, 332 36, Sweden
Gävle kommun
Gävle, Gävle, 801 84, Sweden
Hudiksvalls kommun
Hudiksvall, Hudiksvall, 824 80, Sweden
Hörby kommun
Hörby, Hörby, 242 80, Sweden
Höörs kommun
Höör, Höör, 243 31, Sweden
Katrineholms kommun
Katrineholm, Katrineholm, 641 80, Sweden
Lerums kommun
Lerum, Lerum, 443 80, Sweden
Luleå kommun
Luleå, Luleå, 971 85, Sweden
Mönsterås kommun
Mönsterås, Mönsterås, 383 22, Sweden
Skara kommun
Skara, Skara, 532 88, Sweden
Skellefteå kommun
Skellefteå, Skellefteå, 931 85, Sweden
Staffanstorps kommun
Staffanstorp, Staffanstorp, 245 80, Sweden
Stenungsunds kommun
Stenungsund, Stenungsund, 444 82, Sweden
Sundbybergs stad
Sundbyberg, Sundbyberg, 172 92, Sweden
Sundsvalls kommun
Sundsvall, Sundsvall, 851 85, Sweden
Söderhamns kommun
Söderhamn, Söderhamn, 826 80, Sweden
Södertälje kommun
Södertälje, Södertälje, 151 89, Sweden
Tidaholms kommun
Tidaholm, Tidaholm, 522 83, Sweden
Botkyrka kommun
Tumba, Tumba, 147 85, Sweden
Täby kommun
Täby, Täby, 183 80, Sweden
Uppsala kommun
Uppsala, Uppsala County, 753 75, Sweden
Vellinge kommun
Vellinge, Vellinge, 235 81, Sweden
Lidingö kommun
Lidingö, Sweden
Ronneby kommun
Ronneby, Sweden
Österåkers kommun
Åkersberga, Åkersberga, 184 86, Sweden
Örebro kommun
Örebro, Örebro County, 70135, Sweden
Related Publications (11)
Annerback EM, Wingren G, Svedin CG, Gustafsson PA. Prevalence and characteristics of child physical abuse in Sweden - findings from a population-based youth survey. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Aug;99(8):1229-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01792.x. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
PMID: 20219025BACKGROUNDStoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH, Alink LR. Cultural-geographical differences in the occurrence of child physical abuse? A meta-analysis of global prevalence. Int J Psychol. 2013;48(2):81-94. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.697165.
PMID: 23597008BACKGROUNDNorman RE, Byambaa M, De R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001349. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
PMID: 23209385BACKGROUNDEuser S, Alink LR, Stoltenborgh M, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. A gloomy picture: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 18;15:1068. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2387-9.
PMID: 26476980BACKGROUNDVlahovicova K, Melendez-Torres GJ, Leijten P, Knerr W, Gardner F. Parenting Programs for the Prevention of Child Physical Abuse Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Sep;20(3):351-365. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0232-7.
PMID: 28378136BACKGROUNDKling A, Forster M, Sundell K, Melin L. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support. Behav Ther. 2010 Dec;41(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
PMID: 21035616BACKGROUNDStattin H, Enebrink P, Ozdemir M, Giannotta F. A national evaluation of parenting programs in Sweden: The short-term effects using an RCT effectiveness design. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Dec;83(6):1069-1084. doi: 10.1037/a0039328. Epub 2015 May 25.
PMID: 26009784BACKGROUNDChen M, Chan KL. Effects of Parenting Programs on Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Jan;17(1):88-104. doi: 10.1177/1524838014566718. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
PMID: 25573846BACKGROUNDLundahl BW, Nimer J, Parsons B. Preventing Child Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Parent Training Programs. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(3): 251-262, doi: 10.1177/1049731505284391. Epub 2006.
BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
PMID: 19897823BACKGROUNDvan Leuven L, Enebrink P, Ghaderi A, Sorjonen K, Lalouni M, Forster M. A randomized controlled trial of Safer Kids - A program for parents reported for child abuse: Short-term effects on further reports of child abuse and related risk factors. Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Sep;143:106329. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106329. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
PMID: 37384960DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martin Forster, PhD
Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2019
First Posted
November 14, 2019
Study Start
November 15, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share