Cerebello-Spinal tDCS as Rehabilitative Intervention in Neurodegenerative Ataxia
SCA02
1 other identifier
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a group of disabling disorders which currently lack effective therapies. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar ataxias. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study followed by an open-label phase, the investigators will evaluate whether a repetition of two-weeks' treatment with cerebellar anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS, after a three months interval, may further outlast clinical improvement in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia and can modulate cerebello-motor connectivity, at short and long term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 6, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 19, 2021
March 1, 2021
2 years
October 29, 2019
March 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline
International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).
Baseline - 2 weeks
Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline
Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).
Baseline - 2 weeks
Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline
CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale: 120 point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (most severe cognitive impairment) to 120 (no cognitive impairment).
Baseline - 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline
Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months
Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline
Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months
Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline
Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months
Change in Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) Measurements From Baseline
Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months
Change in the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF36) Score From Baseline
Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months
Study Arms (2)
Real tDCS - Real tDCS
EXPERIMENTAL10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
Sham tDCS - Real tDCS
SHAM COMPARATOR10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks).
Interventions
10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with a cerebellar syndrome and quantifiable cerebellar atrophy
You may not qualify if:
- Severe head trauma in the past
- History of seizures
- History of ischemic stroke or hemorrhage
- Pacemaker
- Metal implants in the head/neck region
- Severe comorbidity
- Intake of illegal drugs
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
AO Spedali Civili
Brescia, BS, 25100, Italy
Related Publications (9)
Benussi A, Dell'Era V, Cantoni V, Bonetta E, Grasso R, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Padovani A, Borroni B. Cerebello-spinal tDCS in ataxia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018 Sep 18;91(12):e1090-e1101. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006210. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
PMID: 30135258BACKGROUNDBenussi A, Dell'Era V, Cotelli MS, Turla M, Casali C, Padovani A, Borroni B. Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia. Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar-Apr;10(2):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 27838276BACKGROUNDBenussi A, Koch G, Cotelli M, Padovani A, Borroni B. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1701-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.26356. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
PMID: 26274840BACKGROUNDBikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PMID: 27372845BACKGROUNDRossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
PMID: 25797650BACKGROUNDMiranda PC, Salvador R, Wenger C, Fernandes SR. Computational models of non-invasive brain and spinal cord stimulation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:6457-6460. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7592207.
PMID: 28269725BACKGROUNDLefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
PMID: 27866120BACKGROUNDFiocchi S, Ravazzani P, Priori A, Parazzini M. Cerebellar and Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Children: Computational Modeling of the Induced Electric Field. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 17;10:522. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00522. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27799905BACKGROUNDvan Dun K, Bodranghien F, Manto M, Marien P. Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review. Cerebellum. 2017 Jun;16(3):695-741. doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0840-7.
PMID: 28032321BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Barbara Borroni, MD
Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili, Brescia
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alberto Benussi, MD
Università degli Studi di Brescia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2019
First Posted
November 6, 2019
Study Start
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share