Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial of Telehealth vs Standard Care in Follow-up of Patients With Chronic Conditions
MAO
A Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial Comparing Telehealth With Standard Clinical Care in the Follow-up of Patients With Chronic Conditions Within the Primary Care Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
732
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The Norwegian health authorities has initiated a three-year trial of telehealth solutions as part of the treatment of patients with chronic illness in the period 2018-2021. Within the trial, telehealth indicates that patients are followed-up outside health-care facilities using information and communication technologies (ICTs). Patients who are followed up using telehealth solutions can answer questions about their own health and/or perform measurements related to their health (e.g. blood pressure, blood glucose, oxygen measurement, weight) via a tablet according to a personalized schedule. The measurement values are transferred from the measuring devices to a tablet so that the users can easily see them and track their results over time. The results are also transmitted digitally to a follow-up service, a healthcare center with nurses, who contacts the patient when needed. The follow-up service provides medical support and guidance based on the patient's needs and planned follow-up, and will, in consultation with the user, evaluate whether the user should contact the general practitioner (GP) or emergency room. The study population of the trial includes users with comprehensive medical needs, with medium to high risk of worsening of their condition, hospitalization or increased need for health and care services. The evaluation includes three main parts: 1) An effect evaluation which is designed as a randomized control trial, 2) a cost-benefit analysis, and 3) a process evaluation which aims to provide recommendations for how to organize and implement telemedicine in clinical practice. The primary outcomes include physical and mental health state, patient experience and use of health services. The effect evaluation is designed as a pragmatic open label multi-center randomized control trial, with two parallel arms with 300 patients in each arm. Patients are recruited between February 2019 and June 2020.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2021
CompletedOctober 7, 2021
October 1, 2021
2.4 years
July 5, 2019
October 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Mean change in health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)) from baseline at 6 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The scale goes from 0 to 1 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 6 months after inclusion
Mean change in health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)) from baseline at 12 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The scale goes from 0 to 1 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 12 months after inclusion
Mean change in health-related quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)) from baseline at 18 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. The scale goes from 0 to 1 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 18 months after inclusion
Mean change in health-related quality of life (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) from baseline at 6 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale goes from 0 to 100 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 6 months after inclusion
Mean change in health-related quality of life (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) from baseline at 12 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale goes from 0 to 100 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 12 months after inclusion
Mean change in health-related quality of life (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)) from baseline at 18 months
Patient's assessment of her health-related quality of life using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale goes from 0 to 100 where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Measured as change from baseline to 18 months after inclusion
Mean change in overall satisfaction with treatment and follow-up from baseline at 6 months
Patients are asked to assess their overall satisfaction with their health care services: "To what extent are you satisfied with the follow-up of your health?". Answers on a four point scale ranging from "Not satisfied at all" to "Very satisfied"
Measured as change from baseline to 6 months after inclusion
Mean change in overall satisfaction with treatment and follow-up from baseline at 12 months
Patients are asked to assess their overall satisfaction with their health care services: "To what extent are you satisfied with the follow-up of your health?". Answers on a four point scale ranging from "Not satisfied at all" to "Very satisfied"
Measured as change from baseline to 12 months after inclusion
Mean change in overall satisfaction with treatment and follow-up from baseline at 18 months
Patients are asked to assess their overall satisfaction with their health care services: "To what extent are you satisfied with the follow-up of your health?". Answers on a four point scale ranging from "Not satisfied at all" to "Very satisfied"
Measured as change from baseline to 18 months after inclusion
Change in yearly health and care cost per person from baseline at 12 months
The total cost of health and care services per patient is calculated by combining information on the use of health and care services with information about private and public costs of health and care services. Yearly health and care cost per person at baseline is defined as the yearly cost 365 days before inclusion. Similarly, the health and care cost at 12 months in defined as the total cost in the first year after inclusion. The change in mean is the primary outcome measure. Other changes, such as distributional changes, may be of interest.
Yearly health and care cost per person is calculated at baseline and at 12 months after inclusion.
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Mean change in sleep quality from baseline at 6 months
Measured as change from baseline to 6 months after inclusion
Mean change in sleep quality from baseline at 12 months
Measured as change from baseline to 12 months after inclusion
Mean change in sleep quality from baseline at 18 months
Measured as change from baseline to 18 months after inclusion
Mean change in patients' sense of control over their health situation from baseline at 6 months
Measured as change from baseline to 6 months after inclusion
Mean change in patients' sense of control over their health situation from baseline at 12 months
Measured as change from baseline to 12 months after inclusion
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Follow-up using telehealth solutions
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm are followed up using a telehealth solution, as specified by the National Directorate of Health at the local centre. The actual follow-up is personalized to the individual user. All users receive a tablet, which can be used to answer questions about own health and/or transmit clinical measurements.
Standard clinical care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm receive standard clinical care in accordance with their medinal needs.
Non-randomized follow-up using telehealth solutions
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm are followed up using a telehealth solution, as specified by the National Directorate of Health at the local centre. The actual follow-up is personalized to the individual user. All users receive a tablet, which can be used to answer questions about own health and/or transmit clinical measurements. This arm is not randomized, but otherwise identical to the randomized experimental arm.
Interventions
Users of telemedicine can answer simple questions about their health condition and/or perform measurements related to their health (e.g., blood pressure, blood sugar, oxygen saturation, weight) via a tablet or a similar device. The results are transferred from the measuring devices to the tablet so that users can easily see them and track their own results over time. The results are transmitted digitally to a follow-up service. The follow-up service contacts the patient in case of signs of deterioration or when measurements lie outside what is normal values for the individual. The follow-up service provides medical support and guidance based on the patient's needs and plan for follow-up, and will, in consultation with the patient, assess whether this should contact their GP/emergency room.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient has a considerable disease burden and comprehensive medical needs
- The patient has a chronic disease
- The patient has medium to high risk of worsening of their condition, hospitalization or increased need for health and care services
- The patient has a high consumption of healthcare services
- The patient has a reduced level of function
- The patient is motivated to use telehealth solutions
- The patient is likely to benefit from the use of telehealth solutions
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is not competent to consent
- The patient is unable to handle the tablet and the measuring equipment to be used
- The patient has a substance abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oslolead
- Oslo Economicscollaborator
- Norwegian Centre for Rural Medicinecollaborator
- Norsk Gallup Institutt AScollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Bodø municipality
Bodø, Norway
Eid municipality
Eidfjord, Norway
Ullensaker municipality
Jessheim, Norway
Kristiansand municipality
Kristiansand, Norway
Larvik municipality
Larvik, Norway
Gamle Oslo district, Oslo
Oslo, Norway
Grünerløkka district, Oslo
Oslo, Norway
Sagene ditrict, Oslo
Oslo, Norway
St.Hanshaugen district, Oslo
Oslo, Norway
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tor Iversen, Professor
University of Oslo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Health Economics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2019
First Posted
October 29, 2019
Study Start
February 9, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2021
Study Completion
June 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Researchers are not allowed to share individual patient data with other researchers.