NCT04135768

Brief Summary

Intra-articular fractures of the distal radius are common in urban populations and result in significant morbidity in terms of time away from work. Volar plating of the distal radius is a commonly used mode of surgical fixation of this fracture. The joint haematoma resulting from the fracture has been hypothesized to contribute to the post-injury disability. As such, this study aims to examine if the evacuation of the haematoma during volar plating results in superior functional outcomes at three months post surgery.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 20, 2019

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2019

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2019

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 16, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

October 20, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 14, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Distal radius fractureArticular fractureJoint haematomaVolar wrist plating

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean difference between QuickDASH scores of both treatment arms at 3 months

    A patient reported outcome using the QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score. This is a patient reported outcome score, which consists of 11 questions. A minimum of 10 must be answered for the score to be valid. The score out of 11 is then calculated as a percentage, with higher numbers indicating worse disability.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Mean difference between QuickDASH scores of both treatment arms at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months

    2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months

  • Mean difference of rate of improvement of QuickDASH scores between groups across 6 months of follow up

    6 months

  • Mean difference between the visual analogue scores of both groups

    2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

  • Mean difference between the grip strength of both groups

    2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

  • Mean difference between the range of motion of the wrist of both groups

    2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants who will undergo both volar locking plate fixation of the distal radius and the study procedure (wrist joint haematoma washout)

Procedure: Wrist joint haematoma washoutProcedure: Volar locking plate insertion of the distal radius

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants who will undergo volar locking plate fixation of the distal radius only

Procedure: Volar locking plate insertion of the distal radius

Interventions

After plating of the distal radius is performed, a small incision is made on the wrist joint capsule. This is the portal for fluid efflux. An intravenous cannula is used to puncture the wrist joint capsule adjacent to the first incision and normal saline is infused through this cannula into the wrist joint. The infusion continues until the fluid efflux from the first portal is clear and no longer blood stained. This will be the point at which the washout is considered to be complete.

Treatment

An anatomical locking plate is applied to the distal radius fracture using screws

PlaceboTreatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Skeletally mature patients of either sex who sustain closed fractures of the distal end radius involving the articular surface, between the ages of 18 and 65
  • The fracture pattern is of an unacceptable morphology as defined by the following radiographic parameters according to the 2009 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Guidelines (Lichtmann, Bindra et al. 2010):
  • \>3 mm radial shortening \>10° dorsal tilt \>2 mm articular displacement The patient has been planned to undergo VLPF Femalepatientswilleitherbe Post-menopausal Surgically sterile If of childbearing age, must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at randomisation. Pregnancy tests will be repeated during each visit.

You may not qualify if:

  • Open fractures Associated fractures around the wrist (e.g. carpal bones, metacarpals, phalanges) requiring different or additional methods of fracture fixation and stabilisation Polytraumatised patients Compartmentsyndromeoftheforearmorhand Neurovascular injury of the ipsilateral limb Concomitantfractureoftheipsilateraland/orcontralateralupperlimbwhichmayimpede post-operative rehabilitation Fractures exceeding 14 days duration during time of first presentation
  • Pre-existing conditions such as:
  • Inflammatory arthritides Connective tissue diseases Diseases of bone metabolism (except osteoporosis) Prior malunited/nonunited fractures of the ipsilateral limb Pregnancy Patients unfit for surgery due to poor general condition Inability or unwillingness to provide written consent. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol as determined by the investigator.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Malaya Medical Center

Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Abe Y, Fujii K. Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction of Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture. Hand Clin. 2017 Nov;33(4):659-668. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2017.07.011.

    PMID: 28991578BACKGROUND
  • MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Richards RS. Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 Oct 31;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-24.

    PMID: 14588078BACKGROUND
  • Smeraglia F, Del Buono A, Maffulli N. Wrist arthroscopy in the management of articular distal radius fractures. Br Med Bull. 2016 Sep;119(1):157-65. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldw032. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

    PMID: 27554281BACKGROUND
  • Gouk CJC, Bindra RR, Tarrant DJ, Thomas MJE. Volar locking plate fixation versus external fixation of distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Nov;43(9):954-960. doi: 10.1177/1753193417743936. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

    PMID: 29228851BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist FracturesIntra-Articular Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Study Officials

  • Tunku Sara Tunku Ahmad Yahaya, FRCS

    University of Malaya Medical Center

    STUDY CHAIR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants are blinded, since the study procedure will be performed via the incision for the main surgery. Thus no external (wound) evidence of the participant's allocation will be visible.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Pilot study, single center, parallel group design
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Orthopaedic Trainee

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2019

First Posted

October 23, 2019

Study Start

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion

March 31, 2021

Study Completion

March 31, 2021

Last Updated

July 16, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations