NCT03311633

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND. Distal radius fractures (FRD) are up to 17% of all diagnosed fractures and are the most commonly treated fractures in adult orthopedic patients. The management could be either conservative or surgical, depending on AO bone fracture classification. The principles of good treatment involves an anatomical reduction with a proper immobilization that keep the reduction. OBJECTIVE. Determine if percutaneous pinning for six weeks versus three has major complications in distal radius fractures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 29, 2017

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 11, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 17, 2017

Completed
6.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6.6 years

First QC Date

October 11, 2017

Last Update Submit

May 6, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Radius Fracture DistalRadius Fracture Distal TherapyFracture fixationClosed Fracture Reduction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale

    It´s a numeric scale, when 0 value is equal to no pain; and 10 is equal to a maximum pain

    14 week

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)

    14 weeks

  • Wrist mobility

    14 weeks

  • Grip strength

    14 weeks

  • Skin condition

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

3 week percutaneous pinning group

EXPERIMENTAL

Percutaneous pinning time will be for three weeks and short cast immobilization for six weeks.

Procedure: Percutaneous pinning time

6 week percutaneous pinning group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Percutaneous pinning time will be for six weeks and also short cast immobilization.

Procedure: Percutaneous pinning time

Interventions

Percutaneous pinning time will be compared in two groups: 3 versus 6 weeks.

3 week percutaneous pinning group6 week percutaneous pinning group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients older than 18 ages
  • any gender
  • distal radius fracture type A or B of AO classification managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning
  • and Informed Consent signature

You may not qualify if:

  • associated ipsilateral fractures in the upper extremity
  • fractures attended and fixed at another institution
  • support external fixation
  • previous skin conditions (infection, ulcers)
  • limitation of wrist mobility prior to injury

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64480, Mexico

Location

Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Monterrey, Nuevo León, 66460, Mexico

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Tahririan MA, Javdan M, Motififard M. Results of pronator quadratus repair in distal radius fractures to prevent tendon ruptures. Indian J Orthop. 2014 Jul;48(4):399-403. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.136275.

  • Niver GE, Ilyas AM. Carpal tunnel syndrome after distal radius fracture. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 Oct;43(4):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

  • Dhainaut A, Daibes K, Odinsson A, Hoff M, Syversen U, Haugeberg G. Exploring the relationship between bone density and severity of distal radius fragility fracture in women. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Jul 17;9:57. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0057-8.

  • Henn CM, Wolfe SW. Distal radius fractures in athletes: approaches and treatment considerations. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014 Mar;22(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000003.

  • Turner RG, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Complications of distal radius fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;38(2):217-28, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.02.002.

  • Davis DI, Baratz M. Soft tissue complications of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2010 May;26(2):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.002.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Study Officials

  • Carlos Acosta-Olivo, PhD

    Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Three week percutaneous pinning group versus Six week percutaneous pinning group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2017

First Posted

October 17, 2017

Study Start

September 29, 2017

Primary Completion

April 20, 2024

Study Completion

April 23, 2024

Last Updated

May 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Locations