NCT03671512

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Periodontal Structure Repair device (PSR) compared to conventional periodontal therapy (scaling and root planing) for the treatment of periodontal pockets caused by periodontal disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2018

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 6, 2018

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 17, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 30, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 27, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in periodontal pocket depth compared to standard root planing at 8 weeks

    The pocket depth is measured using a Williams' periodontal probe. The probe is inserted into the pocket until resistance is met. The depth of the pocket is measured in millimeters (mm) indicated on the probe. Measure the distance from the gingival margin to the tip of the periodontal probe. Each pocket will have six measurement taken around the tooth. The pocket depth measurements to be performed: buccal mesial, buccal, buccal distal, lingual mesial, lingual, lingual distal.

    8 weeks

  • An acceptable safety profile at Visit Week 8 as evidenced by no clinically significant increase in the occurrence of select adverse events

    The primary safety endpoints are to demonstrate an acceptable safety profile at Visit Week 8 as evidenced by no clinically significant increase in the occurrence of any of the following adverse events for the PSR-treated pockets versus the current standard of treatment for periodontal pockets (scaling and root planing): 1. an increase in pocket depth ≥ 2 mm 2. clinical signs and symptoms of an abscess 3. pain localized to the treated teeth.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Change in periodontal pocket depth compared to standard root planing at 12 and 16 weeks

    12 weeks and 16 weeks

  • Change in clinical attachment level compared to standard root planing at Visit Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

    4, 8, 12, 16 weeks

  • To evaluate the percentage of subjects who achieve 15% and 25% improvements over baseline for pocket depth reduction for PSR-treated versus root-planed teeth.

    4, 8, 12, 16 weeks

  • To evaluate the percentage of subjects who achieve 15% and 25% improvements over baseline for clinical attachment level for PSR-treated versus root-planed teeth

    4, 8, 12, 16 weeks

  • Degree of inflammation following procedure

    8 weeks

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Periodontal Structure Repair (PSR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Periodontal pockets treated with PSR

Device: Periodontal Structure Repair (PSR)

Standard Root Planing (SRP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Periodontal pockets treated with SRP

Device: Standard Root Planing

Interventions

Following local anesthesia, initial pocket preparation will be done by bur abrasion utilizing specially designed burs to plane the root surface and remove the inner lining of the pocket. Following bur abrasion, thin strips of gauze sponge are placed into the created space. After removing the gauze strips, PSR is inserted to fill the spaces beginning at the pocket bottom. The final step is placing a layer of cyanoacrylate on both the gingival margin and tooth supragingivally.

Periodontal Structure Repair (PSR)

Ultrasonics and hand instruments are used to remove any subgingival deposits on the roots. Standard instruments and standard application are used. Visual or instrument tactile inspection is used to verify the roots are hard-smooth and have been adequately cleaned.

Standard Root Planing (SRP)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must be in stable health as determined by lack of clinically significant abnormalities as assessed at screening.
  • Subjects must have a minimum of 2 teeth with a pocket depth of 5 to 8 mm per quadrant in at least two quadrants of the mouth with bleeding on probing.
  • Signed and dated informed consent form, meeting all criteria of current FDA regulations and approved by the assigned IRB.
  • Subject must be willing and able to follow all the post treatment oral hygiene requirements.
  • Subjects must be in stable systemic health.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of allergy or sensitivity to any of the PSR paste ingredients or other products used in the PSR or Root Planing procedure.
  • Subjects who demonstrate during the pre-treatment prophylaxis cleaning visit that they cannot adequately comply with post treatment dental hygiene requirements of the study.
  • History or current evidence of chronic infectious disease, system disorders, organ dysfunction, cardiovascular disorders, stroke, renal or hepatic disorder, diabetes or bleeding disorders that may prevent the subject from tolerating the scaling and root planing or PSR device and procedure or any significant clinical illness within 90 days of the study start. If any doubt is present regarding the accuracy of the subject's medical history or their suitability to participate, appropriate consultation, e.g., the Chief Medical Officer of InClinca (the CRO) should be sought or the subject excluded.
  • Wears braces or had any dental procedures within 2 weeks of entering the study. Any significant dental issues noted during the screening oral examination. Any ongoing clinically significant trauma or infectious diseases in the oral cavity.
  • Any previous periodontal procedures including scaling and root planing within 6 months of entering the study.
  • Presence of a medical condition requiring regular treatment with antibiotics or treatment with antibiotics within six months prior to entry into the study.
  • Presence of a medical condition requiring treatment with anticoagulant therapy or drugs, such as heparin or warfarin. Subjects prescribed ≤ 325 mg/day of aspirin should not be excluded and this treatment should not be stopped during their participation in this trial.
  • History of psychiatric disorders occurring within the last two years that required hospitalization or medication.
  • Receipt of an Investigational drug as part of a research study within 30 days or 10 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to entry into the trial.
  • Positive test results for HIV, Hepatitis B surface antigen, or Hepatitis C antibody at screening.
  • Subject is not able to communicate well with the Investigator, to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, or to understand the written informed consent
  • Subject is not suitable to participate in the study in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Teeth with any furcation defects or mobility \>2 will be excluded from treatment in both arms of the study.
  • Medication that alters or affects healing such as chemotherapy, immune-suppressive medications within two months of study start.
  • Subjects having received doses of corticosteroids in excess of 20mg per day within 2 months of study start.
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Forsyth Institute

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02142, United States

Location

Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine

Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8703, United States

Location

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Michael Fare

    Periovance, Inc

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The assessments of efficacy measurements of pocket depth and attachment gain CAL will be performed by a dental professional staff member at the investigator site who is blinded to which procedure was performed in each quadrant. Whenever possible, the same staff member will make these assessments throughout the study. The pocket depth assessments will be performed by a dental professional who has been trained on the actual method. Personnel will be trained to use the University of North Carolina (UNC) probe by the central trainer provided by the sponsor or CRO.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: For each subject, one quadrant will be randomized to PSR and the other quadrant will be randomized to conventional scaling and root planing.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2018

First Posted

September 14, 2018

Study Start

December 6, 2018

Primary Completion

January 17, 2020

Study Completion

March 9, 2020

Last Updated

March 30, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations