NCT04132856

Brief Summary

Children with cancer are vulnerable to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Although screening for psychosocial distress is a standard of care for children with cancer, there is a limited knowledge

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 27, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2019

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

October 10, 2019

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

pediatriconcology

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Feasibility pertaining to recruitment

    Rate of recruitment as measured by percentage of participants who consent to participation as compared to those who are eligible and do not consent

    12 months

  • Feasibility pertaining to retention

    Rates of completed questionnaires at all time points

    12 months

  • Satisfaction with Enhanced Intervention as assessed by questionnaire at completion of study

    5 - point likert scale satisfaction questionnaire with 6 questions pertaining to usefulness and overall satisfaction with the enhanced intervention. The minimum score is 6 (low satisfaction) and the maximum score is 30 (high satisfaction).

    12 months

  • Satisfaction with Enhanced Intervention as assessed by semi-structured interview at completion of study

    Semi-structured interview with 6 questions including "What were your expectations about being in this study?"; "Were your expectations of the study met?"; "Do you have any additional comments/suggestions for the study?"

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Distress

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Patient generic quality of life based on self report

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Patient generic quality of life based on caregiver report

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Patient quality of life as it relates to cancer, based on self-report

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Patient quality of life as it relates to cancer, based on caregiver report

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Sleep duration and quality of sleep of patient and caregiver

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Caregiver emotional support

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • Caregiver Fatigue

    Change from baseline to 12 months

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The Intervention group will receive the services of the Psychosocial Navigator (PSN) monthly for the full 12 months of the study. At baseline, the PSN will provide the health care providers (HCPs) and family with recommendations for mapping and triaging of resources to levels of psychosocial risk (PAT: Universal, Targeted, Clinical) and level of depression and anxiety (mild, moderate, and high mental health problems; as determined by the standardized norms for the measures). This information will be summarized in the Communication Summary Profile and shared with the treating team (oncologist, nurse, and Social Worker, core psychosocial staff involved in the child's care) and family within 48 hours of completion. The PSN will conduct follow-up psychosocial screenings on a monthly basis, using the Distress Thermometer for children and caregivers. Results of the monthly assessments and recommended resources will also be communicated to the caregiver/parent and treating team of the youth.

Other: Psychosocial NavigatorOther: Communication of Summary Profile

Treatment as Usual Group

NO INTERVENTION

Current psychosocial care services will be accessible to Treatment as Usual Group (e.g., social work, child life, psychology, art and music therapy, and psychiatry).

Interventions

Services of psychosocial navigator

Intervention Group

Both patient/caregiver dyad and HCPs will receive a summary of the PAT results and levels of depression and anxiety.

Intervention Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Between 10 and 18 years of age
  • Clinical diagnosis of cancer
  • Less than 4 weeks since diagnosis disclosure
  • Primary caregiver must also consent to participation

You may not qualify if:

  • Cancer diagnosis disclosed more than 4 weeks ago.
  • Primary caregiver declines to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3R9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015. Toronto, ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pinquart M, Shen Y. Behavior problems in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Oct;36(9):1003-16. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr042. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

    PMID: 21810623BACKGROUND
  • Kurtz BP, Abrams AN. Psychiatric aspects of pediatric cancer. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011 Aug;58(4):1003-23, xii. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2011.06.009.

    PMID: 21855719BACKGROUND
  • Kazak AE, Schneider S, Didonato S, Pai AL. Family psychosocial risk screening guided by the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT). Acta Oncol. 2015 May;54(5):574-80. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.995774. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

    PMID: 25752970BACKGROUND
  • Pai AL, Patino-Fernandez AM, McSherry M, Beele D, Alderfer MA, Reilly AT, Hwang WT, Kazak AE. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):50-62. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm053. Epub 2007 Jul 3.

    PMID: 17609228BACKGROUND
  • Barrera M, Hancock K, Rokeach A, Cataudella D, Atenafu E, Johnston D, Punnett A, Nathan PC, Bartels U, Silva M, Cassidy M, Jansen P, Shama W, Greenberg C. External validity and reliability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) among Canadian parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jan;61(1):165-70. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24774. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

    PMID: 24106172BACKGROUND
  • McCarthy MC, Clarke NE, Vance A, Ashley DM, Heath JA, Anderson VA. Measuring psychosocial risk in families caring for a child with cancer: the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0). Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Jul;53(1):78-83. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22007.

    PMID: 19343796BACKGROUND
  • Sint Nicolaas SM, Schepers SA, Hoogerbrugge PM, Caron HN, Kaspers GJ, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Grootenhuis MA, Verhaak CM. Screening for Psychosocial Risk in Dutch Families of a Child With Cancer: Reliability, Validity, and Usability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Aug;41(7):810-9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv119. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

    PMID: 26715054BACKGROUND
  • Desjardins L, Hancock K, Szatmari P, Alexander S, Shama W, De Souza C, Mills D, Abla O, Barrera M. Protocol for mapping psychosocial screening to resources in pediatric oncology: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jul 17;7(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00878-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Maru Barrera, PhD

    The Hospital for Sick Children

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2019

First Posted

October 21, 2019

Study Start

November 27, 2017

Primary Completion

April 30, 2020

Study Completion

April 30, 2020

Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations