Explaining Sedentary Behavior With Planning (the Revised HAPA Model)

NCT04131270 | Recruiting DMC

• 3 other identifiers: USSHWarsaw2017/27/B/HS6/000922021/43/O/HS6/00712/
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 900
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study would investigate the effects of forming action plans on a reduction of sedentary behaviors. Participants will be randomly assigned to either active control group (education on sedentary behaviors and physical activity) or the intervention group (forming action plans referring to replacing sedentary activities with physical activity. The effects of the intervention will be evaluated at the 2-month follow-up and at the 8-month follow-up.

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Keywords

Planning; Physical Activity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Sedentary behavior

  minutes of sedentary behavior per day assessed with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer

  change from the baseline sedentary behavior at 8 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• The composition of waking time

  change from the baseline composition of waking time at 8 months

• Physical activity

  change from the baseline physical activity at 8 months

Other Outcomes (9)

• Sedentary behavior habit

  change from the baseline sedentary behavior habit at 8 months

• Self-efficacy for reducing sedentary behavior

  change from the baseline self-efficacy at 8 months

• Risk perception

  change from the baseline risk perception at 8 months

Study Arms (2)

Planning + Education

EXPERIMENTAL

3 education sessions + 1 planning session (integrated into the 3rd education session); delivered face-to-face over 3 weeks (after the baseline measurement), individually. Planning: The planning materials and forms have sections: (a) instructions of what should be included in a good plan (the when, where, and how components), (b) formulating action and coping plans. Action plans (referring to when, when, and how the individual will act) as well as coping plans (referring to how to overcome potential difficulties) will be formed. After forming the plans individually, experimenters will discuss the plans with the participants.

Behavioral: Planning + Education; Behavioral: Education

Education

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

3 education sessions; delivered face-to-face over 3 weeks (after the baseline measurement), individually. The education includes extended physical activity and sedentary behavior education using participant-educator discussions and printed materials.

Behavioral: Education

Interventions

Planning + Education BEHAVIORAL

Planning: Participants will fill in the planning forms that efer to replacing sedentary behavior with physical activity. The following behavior change techniques are included in the planning intervention protocol: action planning, barrier identification, prompting self-talk, relapse prevention/coping planning. Applications of all behavior change techniques would include references to planning.

Planning + Education

Education BEHAVIORAL

The education would include extended sedentary behavior and physical activity education, delivered face-to-face by the experimenters. The education includes: (1) the behavioral guidelines, tailored to age and health status of the participants, (2) the examples of exercises and their metabolic equivalent, and (3) the education about ways to break sedentary behavior with active breaks.

Education; Planning + Education

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 12 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• not meeting physical activity guidelines proposed by the World Health Organization

You may not qualify if:

• any existing diseases with contraindications for moderate intensity physical activity, confirmed by patient's primary care physician or a specialist in cardiovascular diseases/endocrinology/rehabilitation medicine providing care for the patient during the recruitment and follow-ups

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw: lead
• National Science Centre, Poland: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities

Wroclaw, Lower Silezia, 53-328, Poland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

• Gardner B. A review and analysis of the use of 'habit' in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):277-95. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2013.876238. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

  PMID: 25207647 BACKGROUND

• Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A. Health action process approach. In: Norman P, Conner M, editors. Predicting and changing health behavior. Maidenead, UK: McGraw-Hill; 2015.

  BACKGROUND

• Sallis JF, Spoon C, Cavill N, Engelberg JK, Gebel K, Parker M, Thornton CM, Lou D, Wilson AL, Cutter CL, Ding D. Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 28;12:30. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0188-2.

  PMID: 25886356 BACKGROUND

• Maher JP, Conroy DE. A dual-process model of older adults' sedentary behavior. Health Psychol. 2016 Mar;35(3):262-72. doi: 10.1037/hea0000300. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

  PMID: 26690644 BACKGROUND

• Keller C, Siegrist M. The weight management strategies inventory (WMSI). Development of a new measurement instrument, construct validation, and association with dieting success. Appetite. 2015 Sep;92:322-36. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.037. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

  PMID: 26048006 BACKGROUND

• Berli C, Loretini P, Radtke T, Hornung R, Scholz U. Predicting physical activity in adolescents: the role of compensatory health beliefs within the Health Action Process Approach. Psychol Health. 2014;29(4):458-74. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.865028. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

  PMID: 24229317 BACKGROUND

• Luszczynska A, Hagger MS, Banik A, Horodyska K, Knoll N, Scholz U. Self-Efficacy, Planning, or a Combination of Both? A Longitudinal Experimental Study Comparing Effects of Three Interventions on Adolescents' Body Fat. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159125. eCollection 2016.

  PMID: 27410961 BACKGROUND

Related Links

• Study protocol in Polish

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior; Motor Activity

Interventions

Educational Status

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Socioeconomic Factors; Population Characteristics

Study Officials

• Aleksandra Luszczynska, PhD

  SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Aleksandra Luszczynska, PhD

CONTACT

+48694441765; aluszczynska@swps.edu.pl

Ewa Kulis, MA

CONTACT

+48723527172; ekulis@swps.edu.pl

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor of Psychology

Model Details: Participants will be randomly assigned to an active control group (education on sedentary behavior and physical activity) or to a planning intervention (education on sedentary behavior and physical activity + education on how to form behavior change plans + forming a plan to change sedentary behavior using a planning sheet)

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: October 15, 2019
• First Posted: October 18, 2019
• Study Start: January 2, 2020
• Primary Completion: March 30, 2024
• Study Completion: March 30, 2024
• Last Updated: March 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
• Time Frame: Respective data will be made available together with the submission of the manuscript reporting the findings for the main outcome (not later that within 2 years after the completion of data collection).
• Access Criteria: Data will be uploaded on Open Science Framework, available to researchers who will have a respective link.

Locations

PL (1)