Study Stopped
Low recruitment, insufficient funding
Efficacy of Medical Therapy in Women and Men With Angina and Myocardial Bridging
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed clinical trial is relevant to public health because it is expected to expand the differential diagnosis and provide an evidence--based therapy for the large population of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive CAD who currently remain undiagnosed and untreated. It, therefore, upholds an important part of the mission of the The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), which is to promote the treatment of heart disease and enhance the health of all individuals so that they can live longer and more fulfilling lives.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Oct 2020
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 17, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2025
CompletedFebruary 25, 2025
February 1, 2025
1.4 years
April 1, 2019
February 3, 2025
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Angina Score Assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Effectiveness of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers for reducing angina in patients with a Myocardial Bridge (MB) compared to placebo determined after 30 days on the study drug by a change in angina, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The SAQ assesses 5 domains: physical limitation, angina stability angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life. Each domain score is normalized to a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
baseline and 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Duke Treadmill Score by Risk Category
baseline, 30 days
Duke Treadmill Score
baseline, 30 days
Number of Participants With Cardiac Events
30 days, 6 months
Drug Adherence.
30 days
Number of Participants With Side Effects
30 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Beta Blocker (nebivolol)
ACTIVE COMPARATORCalcium Channel Blocker (diltiazem)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
The intervention to be tested is oral beta blocker (nebivolol 2.5 mg) vs. calcium channel blocker (Diltiazem-SR 120 mg) vs. placebo. Once enrolled, baseline data will be gathered and subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment arm. Subjects will be instructed to take their assigned study drug once a day for 30 days.
The intervention to be tested is oral beta blocker (nebivolol 2.5 mg) vs. calcium channel blocker (Diltiazem-SR 120 mg) vs. placebo. Once enrolled, baseline data will be gathered and subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment arm. Subjects will be instructed to take their assigned study drug once a day for 30 days.
The intervention to be tested is oral beta blocker (nebivolol 2.5 mg) vs. calcium channel blocker (Diltiazem-SR 120 mg) vs. placebo. Once enrolled, baseline data will be gathered and subjects will be randomly assigned to a treatment arm. Subjects will be instructed to take their assigned study drug once a day for 30 days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Stable angina (typical or atypical, based on Diamond criteria (35))
- Exercise stress echocardiogram or exercise stress test (with beta blocker or calcium channel blocker held) performed within six months of enrollment
- CCTA or invasive coronary angiogram confirming the presence of an MB
- Absence of obstructive CAD, as demonstrated by no ischemia on stress testing and no significant obstructive CAD (coronary stenosis \<50%) on CCTA or invasive coronary angiogram
You may not qualify if:
- Asymptomatic
- Status--post heart transplant
- Presence of another likely explanation of chest pain, such as pulmonary hypertension, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, or aortic stenosis
- Presence of an acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, NSTEMI, or STEMI), Tako--tsubo, or cardiogenic shock
- An abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (EF\<55%)
- Use of existing medication that has an unsafe drug--drug interaction with beta blockers or calcium channel blockers
- Refusal to take beta blockers or calcium channel blockers
- Resting systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg or heart rate \<50 beats per minute
- Inability to provide an informed consent, including an inability to speak, read, or understand English or Spanish
- A hearing impairment that won't allow for a typical verbal conversation or a visual impairment that won't allow for reading of the written consent
- A potentially vulnerable subject (including pregnant women, prisoners, economically and educationally disadvantaged, decisionally impaired, and institutionalized individuals)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (1)
Shaw LJ, Peterson ED, Shaw LK, Kesler KL, DeLong ER, Harrell FE Jr, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. Use of a prognostic treadmill score in identifying diagnostic coronary disease subgroups. Circulation. 1998 Oct 20;98(16):1622-30. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.16.1622.
PMID: 9778327BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Early termination led to a small number of subjects analyzed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jennifer A. Tremmel, MD, MS
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Tremmel, MD, MS
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Interventional cardiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2019
First Posted
October 17, 2019
Study Start
October 15, 2020
Primary Completion
March 11, 2022
Study Completion
October 17, 2024
Last Updated
February 25, 2025
Results First Posted
February 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share