Feasibility and Accuracy of Nanosensor-based Cancer Diagnosis at the Point-of-care (Chedza)
Chedza
2 other identifiers
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective feasibility and validation study of a novel, near-to-care modality for diagnosis of malignancy among cancer suspects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2021
CompletedMay 2, 2022
April 1, 2022
2.1 years
October 4, 2019
April 26, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Accuracy for diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.
Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy for diagnosis of invasive breast cancer
Accuracy (proportion of true positive and true negative out of total number assessed) of CEM in comparison with standard diagnostic approach.
Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Time to diagnosis
Time from diagnostic procedure to knowledge of test result by the treating clinician
Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Proficiency in testing using CEM platform
Proportion of personnel of varying laboratory experience and training modalities with proficiency using CEM platform
Day 1, At completion of training
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Accuracy for sub-type diagnosis (aggressive vs. indolent) of non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Accuracy for molecular subtype diagnosis of invasive breast cancer
Day 1, at time of diagnosis
Study Arms (1)
Standard diagnosis and CEM platform
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive standard diagnostic approach and assessment by CEM platform
Interventions
Fine needle aspirates evaluated by CEM device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Botswana citizen
- Age 18 years or older
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Undergoing diagnostic procedure for palpable abnormality (biopsy, node/mass resection, or fine-needle aspirate) for diagnosis of possible lymphoid malignancy or breast cancer
You may not qualify if:
- Involuntary incarceration (prison, jail, etc.)
- Procedures involving internal organs or locations expected to have elevated risk of complication
- Increased risk for severe bleeding as defined as known hemophilia or other bleeding disorder, use of anticoagulants in past week (not including aspirin or other NSAIDS), advanced liver disease, or other condition determined by clinician to significantly increase bleeding risk of procedure
- Known pregnancy
- Critical illness as defined by current intensive care admission, hypotension (systolic BP\<100mmHg), hypoxemia (O2 saturation \<94% on room air), or other condition determined by clinician to significantly decrease physiologic tolerance of procedure
- Other condition felt by the clinician performing procedure to significantly increase risk of procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)lead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute Partnershipcollaborator
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
- Brigham and Women's Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute
Gaborone, Botswana
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ralph Weissleder, MD, PhD
Massachusetts General Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott Dryden-Peterson, MD, MSc
Botswana Harvard AIDS Institute, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking, open label.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Associate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2019
First Posted
October 8, 2019
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 20, 2021
Study Completion
September 20, 2021
Last Updated
May 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Following completion of primary analysis.
- Access Criteria
- Sharing following required IRB approval (Botswana and US).
Completely anonymized data can be shared to investigators following successful receipt of IRB approval (Botswana and US committees).