Study Stopped
Covid-19 and we failed to submit annual report for 2017 and 2018
Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs. Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of patients with shoulder pathology treated with either ketorolac or corticosteroid injections, in a randomized double-blinded study. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid. Specific Aim 1: Hypothesis 1: Injection of the shoulder (in the subacromial space) with Ketorolac will be more effective than corticosteroid injection for the treatment of a variety of shoulder pathologies. The risks associated with this study primarily concern adverse reactions to the study drugs. The drugs used in this study are not narcotics or habit-forming but can have side effects. The patient's physician will screen for any heart, intestinal, or kidney disease or condition that would increase the chance for the patient to have an unwanted side effect.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 22, 2022
CompletedDecember 14, 2023
November 1, 2023
5 months
December 11, 2015
January 31, 2022
November 27, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Baseline - pre-injection
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale after first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Baseline - immediately after the injection
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Day 2
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Week 1
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Week 2
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Week 4
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Week 6
Visual Analog Scale
Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.
Week 12
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 6
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)
Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Baseline
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Week 6
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Week 12
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Week 6
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group 1 (control)
PLACEBO COMPARATORwill receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
Group 2 (ketorolac)
EXPERIMENTALwill receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml
Group 3 (kenalog)
OTHERPt will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone. Group 3 is standard of care
Interventions
Group 2 (ketorolac): will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml
Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine
Group 3 (kenalog): 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Rotator Cuff Tendinitis
- Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
- Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
- Subjects who speak English
You may not qualify if:
- Age: \< 18 years old
- Prior Shoulder Surgery
- Fracture
- Acute Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
- Infection
- Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1c \>8)
- Recent Prior Shoulder Injection in either the Subacromial space
- Workers Compensation
- History of Gastric Ulcers
- Tumor Involving the Shoulder Region
- Prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding, allergic reactions, impaired renal function, seizures or cardiac arrhythmias
- Subject unable to provide informed consent
- Subjects who don't speak English
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening or are of child bearing age
- Patients currently receiving an aspirin, NSAID regimen or any other anti-inflammatory agents that could affect inflammation response.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Michael Khazzamlead
Study Sites (2)
John Hopkins Shoulder & Sports Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Related Publications (37)
Adebajo AO, Nash P, Hazleman BL. A prospective double blind dummy placebo controlled study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide injection with oral diclofenac 50 mg TDS in patients with rotator cuff tendinitis. J Rheumatol. 1990 Sep;17(9):1207-10.
PMID: 2290163BACKGROUNDAlvarez CM, Litchfield R, Jackowski D, Griffin S, Kirkley A. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing subacromial injection of betamethasone and xylocaine to xylocaine alone in chronic rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):255-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546504267345.
PMID: 15701612BACKGROUNDChoi WD, Cho DH, Hong YH, Noh JH, Lee ZI, Byun SD. Effects of subacromial bursa injection with corticosteroid and hyaluronidase according to dosage. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;37(5):668-74. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.668. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
PMID: 24236254BACKGROUNDBlair B, Rokito AS, Cuomo F, Jarolem K, Zuckerman JD. Efficacy of injections of corticosteroids for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1685-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00007.
PMID: 8934482BACKGROUNDMin KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PMID: 23177167BACKGROUNDPenning LI, de Bie RA, Walenkamp GH. The effectiveness of injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid in patients with subacromial impingement: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1246-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750.
PMID: 22933498BACKGROUNDKarthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D. A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):77-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22137.
PMID: 20044683BACKGROUNDKoester MC, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Spindler KP. The efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of rotator cuff disease: A systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Jan;15(1):3-11. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200701000-00002.
PMID: 17213378BACKGROUNDMarder RA, Kim SH, Labson JD, Hunter JC. Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome: a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1442-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00534.
PMID: 22992814BACKGROUNDBalasubramaniam P, Prathap K. The effect of injection of hydrocortisone into rabbit calcaneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Nov;54(4):729-34. No abstract available.
PMID: 4639447BACKGROUNDKapetanos G. The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Mar;(163):170-9.
PMID: 7067249BACKGROUNDOxlund H. The influence of a local injection of cortisol on the mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments and the indirect effect on skin. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Apr;51(2):231-8. doi: 10.3109/17453678008990791.
PMID: 7435179BACKGROUNDWiggins ME, Fadale PD, Barrach H, Ehrlich MG, Walsh WR. Healing characteristics of a type I collagenous structure treated with corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):279-88. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200221.
PMID: 8198200BACKGROUNDWei AS, Callaci JJ, Juknelis D, Marra G, Tonino P, Freedman KB, Wezeman FH. The effect of corticosteroid on collagen expression in injured rotator cuff tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1331-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00806.
PMID: 16757768BACKGROUNDDogan N, Erdem AF, Gundogdu C, Kursad H, Kizilkaya M. The effects of ketorolac and morphine on articular cartilage and synovium in the rabbit knee joint. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;82(7):502-5. doi: 10.1139/y04-066.
PMID: 15389297BACKGROUNDJean YH, Wen ZH, Chang YC, Hsieh SP, Tang CC, Wang YH, Wong CS. Intra-articular injection of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor parecoxib attenuates osteoarthritis progression in anterior cruciate ligament-transected knee in rats: role of excitatory amino acids. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jun;15(6):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
PMID: 17198754BACKGROUNDItzkowitch D, Ginsberg F, Leon M, Bernard V, Appelboom T. Peri-articular injection of tenoxicam for painful shoulders: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Nov;15(6):604-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02238552.
PMID: 8973872BACKGROUNDKenaolg Package Insert. July 2014; Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_kenalog-40.pdf.
BACKGROUNDKetorolac: Drug Class and Mechanism. 2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/ketorolac-oral/article.htm
BACKGROUNDOgbru, O. Marcaine - Drug Class and Mechanism. 6/27/2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/bupivicaine-injection/article.htm.
BACKGROUNDKenalog: Drug Summary. Available from: http://www.pdr.net/drug-summary/kenalog-40?druglabelid=2494
BACKGROUNDHawker, G.A., et al. Measures of Adult Pain. 2011; Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.20543/pdf
BACKGROUNDGould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):697-706. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00525.x.
PMID: 11822520BACKGROUNDMichener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096.
PMID: 12469084BACKGROUNDRichards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
PMID: 22958838BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDGerstenfeld LC, Al-Ghawas M, Alkhiary YM, Cullinane DM, Krall EA, Fitch JL, Webb EG, Thiede MA, Einhorn TA. Selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and experimental fracture-healing. Reversibility of effects after short-term treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):114-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00495.
PMID: 17200318BACKGROUNDHo ML, Chang JK, Wang GJ. Effects of ketorolac on bone repair: A radiographic study in modeled demineralized bone matrix grafted rabbits. Pharmacology. 1998 Sep;57(3):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000028236.
PMID: 9691235BACKGROUNDO'Keefe RJ, Tiyapatanaputi P, Xie C, Li TF, Clark C, Zuscik MJ, Chen D, Drissi H, Schwarz E, Zhang X. COX-2 has a critical role during incorporation of structural bone allografts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Apr;1068:532-42. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.012.
PMID: 16831949BACKGROUNDHaws MJ, Kucan JO, Roth AC, Suchy H, Brown RE. The effects of chronic ketorolac tromethamine (toradol) on wound healing. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Aug;37(2):147-51. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199608000-00005.
PMID: 8863973BACKGROUNDPrisk V, Huard J. Muscle injuries and repair: the role of prostaglandins and inflammation. Histol Histopathol. 2003 Oct;18(4):1243-56. doi: 10.14670/HH-18.1243.
PMID: 12973691BACKGROUNDRadi ZA, Khan NK. Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on bone, tendon, and ligament healing. Inflamm Res. 2005 Sep;54(9):358-66. doi: 10.1007/s00011-005-1367-4.
PMID: 16273333BACKGROUNDSucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Agrawal S, Elerson E, Nelson T, McClung A. Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6a2a.
PMID: 18449047BACKGROUNDPradhan BB, Tatsumi RL, Gallina J, Kuhns CA, Wang JC, Dawson EG. Ketorolac and spinal fusion: does the perioperative use of ketorolac really inhibit spinal fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2079-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818396f4.
PMID: 18698276BACKGROUNDGlassman SD, Rose SM, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ, Johnson JR. The effect of postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):834-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804010-00020.
PMID: 9563116BACKGROUNDPark SY, Moon SH, Park MS, Oh KS, Lee HM. The effects of ketorolac injected via patient controlled analgesia postoperatively on spinal fusion. Yonsei Med J. 2005 Apr 30;46(2):245-51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.245.
PMID: 15861498BACKGROUNDMullis BH, Copland ST, Weinhold PS, Miclau T, Lester GE, Bos GD. Effect of COX-2 inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on a mouse fracture model. Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):827-37. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.12.018. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
PMID: 16497308BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Michael Khazzam
- Organization
- UT Southwestern Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Khazzam, MD
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR -Orthopaedic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2015
First Posted
October 4, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 14, 2017
Study Completion
September 14, 2017
Last Updated
December 14, 2023
Results First Posted
April 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share