NCT04115644

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes of patients with shoulder pathology treated with either ketorolac or corticosteroid injections, in a randomized double-blinded study. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of ketorolac compared to corticosteroid. Specific Aim 1: Hypothesis 1: Injection of the shoulder (in the subacromial space) with Ketorolac will be more effective than corticosteroid injection for the treatment of a variety of shoulder pathologies. The risks associated with this study primarily concern adverse reactions to the study drugs. The drugs used in this study are not narcotics or habit-forming but can have side effects. The patient's physician will screen for any heart, intestinal, or kidney disease or condition that would increase the chance for the patient to have an unwanted side effect.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2017

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 11, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 14, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 14, 2017

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 4, 2019

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 22, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 11, 2015

Results QC Date

January 31, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale prior to first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Baseline - pre-injection

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale after first injection. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Baseline - immediately after the injection

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Day 2

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Week 1

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Week 2

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Week 4

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Week 6

  • Visual Analog Scale

    Pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale. The visual analog scale is a 0-10 scale, 0 being no pain, 10 being unbearable pain.

    Week 12

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Baseline

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Week 6

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

    Pain, instability, and activities of daily living as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Score. The ASES is a 100-point scale that consists of two dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. One pain scale is worth 50 points, and activities of daily living worth 50 points. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

    Baseline

  • Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

    Week 6

  • Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)

    Week 12

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Baseline

  • Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Week 6

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group 1 (control)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine

Drug: Marcaine (placebo)

Group 2 (ketorolac)

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml

Drug: KetorolacDrug: Marcaine (placebo)

Group 3 (kenalog)

OTHER

Pt will receive an injection of 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone. Group 3 is standard of care

Drug: Marcaine (placebo)Drug: Kenalog

Interventions

Group 2 (ketorolac): will receive an injection of 3 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 2 cc ketorolac 30 mg/ml

Also known as: Toradol
Group 2 (ketorolac)

Group 1 (control): will receive an injection of 5 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine

Also known as: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride
Group 1 (control)Group 2 (ketorolac)Group 3 (kenalog)

Group 3 (kenalog): 4 cc 0.25% Marcaine without epinephrine and 1 cc triamcinolone.

Also known as: Triamcinolone Acetonide
Group 3 (kenalog)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Rotator Cuff Tendinitis
  • Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
  • Subjects who speak English

You may not qualify if:

  • Age: \< 18 years old
  • Prior Shoulder Surgery
  • Fracture
  • Acute Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Infection
  • Uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1c \>8)
  • Recent Prior Shoulder Injection in either the Subacromial space
  • Workers Compensation
  • History of Gastric Ulcers
  • Tumor Involving the Shoulder Region
  • Prior history of gastrointestinal bleeding, allergic reactions, impaired renal function, seizures or cardiac arrhythmias
  • Subject unable to provide informed consent
  • Subjects who don't speak English
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating at time of screening or are of child bearing age
  • Patients currently receiving an aspirin, NSAID regimen or any other anti-inflammatory agents that could affect inflammation response.
  • +4 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

John Hopkins Shoulder & Sports Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

Related Publications (37)

  • Adebajo AO, Nash P, Hazleman BL. A prospective double blind dummy placebo controlled study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide injection with oral diclofenac 50 mg TDS in patients with rotator cuff tendinitis. J Rheumatol. 1990 Sep;17(9):1207-10.

    PMID: 2290163BACKGROUND
  • Alvarez CM, Litchfield R, Jackowski D, Griffin S, Kirkley A. A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing subacromial injection of betamethasone and xylocaine to xylocaine alone in chronic rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):255-62. doi: 10.1177/0363546504267345.

    PMID: 15701612BACKGROUND
  • Choi WD, Cho DH, Hong YH, Noh JH, Lee ZI, Byun SD. Effects of subacromial bursa injection with corticosteroid and hyaluronidase according to dosage. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013 Oct;37(5):668-74. doi: 10.5535/arm.2013.37.5.668. Epub 2013 Oct 29.

    PMID: 24236254BACKGROUND
  • Blair B, Rokito AS, Cuomo F, Jarolem K, Zuckerman JD. Efficacy of injections of corticosteroids for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1685-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199611000-00007.

    PMID: 8934482BACKGROUND
  • Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

    PMID: 23177167BACKGROUND
  • Penning LI, de Bie RA, Walenkamp GH. The effectiveness of injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid in patients with subacromial impingement: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1246-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750.

    PMID: 22933498BACKGROUND
  • Karthikeyan S, Kwong HT, Upadhyay PK, Parsons N, Drew SJ, Griffin D. A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):77-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22137.

    PMID: 20044683BACKGROUND
  • Koester MC, Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Spindler KP. The efficacy of subacromial corticosteroid injection in the treatment of rotator cuff disease: A systematic review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Jan;15(1):3-11. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200701000-00002.

    PMID: 17213378BACKGROUND
  • Marder RA, Kim SH, Labson JD, Hunter JC. Injection of the subacromial bursa in patients with rotator cuff syndrome: a prospective, randomized study comparing the effectiveness of different routes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Aug 15;94(16):1442-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00534.

    PMID: 22992814BACKGROUND
  • Balasubramaniam P, Prathap K. The effect of injection of hydrocortisone into rabbit calcaneal tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972 Nov;54(4):729-34. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4639447BACKGROUND
  • Kapetanos G. The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Mar;(163):170-9.

    PMID: 7067249BACKGROUND
  • Oxlund H. The influence of a local injection of cortisol on the mechanical properties of tendons and ligaments and the indirect effect on skin. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980 Apr;51(2):231-8. doi: 10.3109/17453678008990791.

    PMID: 7435179BACKGROUND
  • Wiggins ME, Fadale PD, Barrach H, Ehrlich MG, Walsh WR. Healing characteristics of a type I collagenous structure treated with corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):279-88. doi: 10.1177/036354659402200221.

    PMID: 8198200BACKGROUND
  • Wei AS, Callaci JJ, Juknelis D, Marra G, Tonino P, Freedman KB, Wezeman FH. The effect of corticosteroid on collagen expression in injured rotator cuff tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1331-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00806.

    PMID: 16757768BACKGROUND
  • Dogan N, Erdem AF, Gundogdu C, Kursad H, Kizilkaya M. The effects of ketorolac and morphine on articular cartilage and synovium in the rabbit knee joint. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004 Jul;82(7):502-5. doi: 10.1139/y04-066.

    PMID: 15389297BACKGROUND
  • Jean YH, Wen ZH, Chang YC, Hsieh SP, Tang CC, Wang YH, Wong CS. Intra-articular injection of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor parecoxib attenuates osteoarthritis progression in anterior cruciate ligament-transected knee in rats: role of excitatory amino acids. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jun;15(6):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 2.

    PMID: 17198754BACKGROUND
  • Itzkowitch D, Ginsberg F, Leon M, Bernard V, Appelboom T. Peri-articular injection of tenoxicam for painful shoulders: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 1996 Nov;15(6):604-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02238552.

    PMID: 8973872BACKGROUND
  • Kenaolg Package Insert. July 2014; Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_kenalog-40.pdf.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ketorolac: Drug Class and Mechanism. 2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/ketorolac-oral/article.htm

    BACKGROUND
  • Ogbru, O. Marcaine - Drug Class and Mechanism. 6/27/2014; Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/bupivicaine-injection/article.htm.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kenalog: Drug Summary. Available from: http://www.pdr.net/drug-summary/kenalog-40?druglabelid=2494

    BACKGROUND
  • Hawker, G.A., et al. Measures of Adult Pain. 2011; Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.20543/pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Gould D, Kelly D, Goldstone L, Gammon J. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):697-706. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00525.x.

    PMID: 11822520BACKGROUND
  • Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096.

    PMID: 12469084BACKGROUND
  • Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, Iannotti JP, Mow VC, Sidles JA, Zuckerman JD. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994 Nov;3(6):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

    PMID: 22958838BACKGROUND
  • Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.

    PMID: 2748771BACKGROUND
  • Gerstenfeld LC, Al-Ghawas M, Alkhiary YM, Cullinane DM, Krall EA, Fitch JL, Webb EG, Thiede MA, Einhorn TA. Selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and experimental fracture-healing. Reversibility of effects after short-term treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):114-25. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00495.

    PMID: 17200318BACKGROUND
  • Ho ML, Chang JK, Wang GJ. Effects of ketorolac on bone repair: A radiographic study in modeled demineralized bone matrix grafted rabbits. Pharmacology. 1998 Sep;57(3):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000028236.

    PMID: 9691235BACKGROUND
  • O'Keefe RJ, Tiyapatanaputi P, Xie C, Li TF, Clark C, Zuscik MJ, Chen D, Drissi H, Schwarz E, Zhang X. COX-2 has a critical role during incorporation of structural bone allografts. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Apr;1068:532-42. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.012.

    PMID: 16831949BACKGROUND
  • Haws MJ, Kucan JO, Roth AC, Suchy H, Brown RE. The effects of chronic ketorolac tromethamine (toradol) on wound healing. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Aug;37(2):147-51. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199608000-00005.

    PMID: 8863973BACKGROUND
  • Prisk V, Huard J. Muscle injuries and repair: the role of prostaglandins and inflammation. Histol Histopathol. 2003 Oct;18(4):1243-56. doi: 10.14670/HH-18.1243.

    PMID: 12973691BACKGROUND
  • Radi ZA, Khan NK. Effects of cyclooxygenase inhibition on bone, tendon, and ligament healing. Inflamm Res. 2005 Sep;54(9):358-66. doi: 10.1007/s00011-005-1367-4.

    PMID: 16273333BACKGROUND
  • Sucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Agrawal S, Elerson E, Nelson T, McClung A. Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1119-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6a2a.

    PMID: 18449047BACKGROUND
  • Pradhan BB, Tatsumi RL, Gallina J, Kuhns CA, Wang JC, Dawson EG. Ketorolac and spinal fusion: does the perioperative use of ketorolac really inhibit spinal fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2079-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818396f4.

    PMID: 18698276BACKGROUND
  • Glassman SD, Rose SM, Dimar JR, Puno RM, Campbell MJ, Johnson JR. The effect of postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):834-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804010-00020.

    PMID: 9563116BACKGROUND
  • Park SY, Moon SH, Park MS, Oh KS, Lee HM. The effects of ketorolac injected via patient controlled analgesia postoperatively on spinal fusion. Yonsei Med J. 2005 Apr 30;46(2):245-51. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.2.245.

    PMID: 15861498BACKGROUND
  • Mullis BH, Copland ST, Weinhold PS, Miclau T, Lester GE, Bos GD. Effect of COX-2 inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on a mouse fracture model. Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):827-37. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.12.018. Epub 2006 Feb 23.

    PMID: 16497308BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Interventions

KetorolacKetorolac TromethamineBupivacaineTriamcinolone Acetonide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

IndomethacinIndolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesTriamcinolonePregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Michael Khazzam
Organization
UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Michael Khazzam, MD

    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PROFESSOR -Orthopaedic Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2015

First Posted

October 4, 2019

Study Start

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion

September 14, 2017

Study Completion

September 14, 2017

Last Updated

December 14, 2023

Results First Posted

April 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations