Lidocaine vs Ketorolac for Management of Renal Colic in the Emergency Department
Lidocaine Versus Ketorolac for the Management of Renal Colic
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypothesis of the study is that lidocaine will be as effective as ketorolac in decreasing patient's perception of pain as measured by the 10 point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The aim of the study is to compare the safety \& efficacy of lidocaine versus ketorolac for acute pain secondary to renal colic in the Emergency Department (ED).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 6, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2019
CompletedJuly 11, 2018
July 1, 2018
2 years
March 6, 2017
July 9, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain score at 15 minutes
Patient's perception of pain as described by the use of numeric rating scale (NRS) at 15 minutes after initial study interventions
at 15 minutes after initial study interventions
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Adverse event-dizziness
throughout study period (90 minutes)
Adverse event-perioral numbness
throughout study period (90 minutes)
Adverse event-nausea
throughout study period (90 minutes)
Adverse event-vomiting
throughout study period (90 minutes)
Adverse event-arrhythmia
throughout study period (90 minutes)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALLidocaine 1.5mg/kg IVPB in 50ml normal saline over 10 minutes (active experimental) and normal saline 1ml intravenous push injection (placebo)
Ketorolac
ACTIVE COMPARATORKetorolac 30mg (1ml) intravenous push injection (active intervention) and Normal saline 50ml IVPB over 10 minutes (placebo)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients 18 years old and older
- Presenting with acute generalized pain secondary to suspected or confirmed renal colic
- Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS)
- Provides informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Reported/documented allergy to lidocaine OR ketorolac (Toradol) OR morphine, corn, aspirin, ibuprofen
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable as dictated by the medical resident or attending \[(Heart rate not within 60-110bpm); (Respiratory rate not within 12-20 bpm); (Blood pressure not within 90/50 to 180/100); (Oxygen saturation not within 94-100%)\]
- Patient with unwillingness to provide informed consent
- Patients with past medical history of cardiovascular disorders (examples include but are not limited to: myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart blocks, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, slow heart rate, bradycardia, coronary artery disease, QT prolongation)
- Past medical history of: liver dysfunction (ie: cirrhosis), chronic alcohol abuse, gastrointestinal bleed or recent gastrointestinal bleed (within past 5 days), renal dysfunction or disease, seizures (or currently actively receiving treatment for seizures), inflammatory bowel disease (or currently actively receiving treatment for inflammatory bowel disease), hepatitis (or currently actively receiving treatment for hepatitis).
- History of liver transplant
- Currently on dialysis
- Has acute heart, kidney, liver, respiratory failure or trauma
- In altered mental status
- In significant trauma, actively breastfeeding or pregnant
- Has language barriers who are unable to describe pain,
- Weighing at or over 130kg
- Has a blood pressure reading greater than 180/120 mmHg at triage,
- Previously enrolled to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11201, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sylvie de Souza, MD
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial where blinding will be conducted and applied to the study investigator, physicians, and nursing staff providing care to the patient. An independent biostatistician will conduct a statistical analysis with blinded data. Only the pharmacists preparing the study interventions will be unblended to the study treatments. The pharmacists procuring the interventions will not be part of data collection or analysis.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2017
First Posted
May 2, 2017
Study Start
March 6, 2017
Primary Completion
March 6, 2019
Study Completion
March 6, 2019
Last Updated
July 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share