Study Stopped
Pandemic related supply shortages and slowed enrollment.
Dosing of Ketorolac in the Emergency Department
Dosing of Ketorolac for Four Classes of Complaints in the Emergency Department
1 other identifier
interventional
289
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The optimal dose of ketorolac in the Emergency Department setting is no clear. We will compare 3 doses to determine the optimal dose.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 5, 2024
CompletedNovember 5, 2024
October 1, 2024
6.1 years
March 7, 2018
September 19, 2024
October 16, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Difference of Pain Intensity Before and 30 Minute After Study Drug Administration in Participants With Any Pain Type
The outcome measure is the average change in pain score. Change in pain score is calculated for each participant by subtracting the post-treatment pain score from the pretreatment pain score (i.e. pre-treatment pain score minus post-treatment pain score), then averaging them within each group. The pain score is collected using the visual analog scale, which is a 100mm line that participants make a mark on to indicate their pain intensity. The line is then measured from the left end of the line to where the mark was made. The minimum value is 0mm (left end of the line) being no pain and the maximum value is 100mm (right end of the line) being the worst pain possible.
30 minutes
Difference of Pain Intensity Before and 30 Minute After Study Drug Administration in Participants With Abdominal Pain
The outcome measure is the average change in pain score. Change in pain score is calculated for each participant by subtracting the post-treatment pain score from the pretreatment pain score (i.e. pre-treatment pain score minus post-treatment pain score), then averaging them within each group. The pain score is collected using the visual analog scale, which is a 100mm line that participants make a mark on to indicate their pain intensity. The line is then measured from the left end of the line to where the mark was made. The minimum value is 0mm (left end of the line) being no pain and the maximum value is 100mm (right end of the line) being the worst pain possible.
30 minutes
Difference of Pain Intensity Before and 30 Minute After Study Drug Administration in Participants With Headache
The outcome measure is the average change in pain score. Change in pain score is calculated for each participant by subtracting the post-treatment pain score from the pretreatment pain score (i.e. pre-treatment pain score minus post-treatment pain score), then averaging them within each group. The pain score is collected using the visual analog scale, which is a 100mm line that participants make a mark on to indicate their pain intensity. The line is then measured from the left end of the line to where the mark was made. The minimum value is 0mm (left end of the line) being no pain and the maximum value is 100mm (right end of the line) being the worst pain possible.
30 minutes
Difference of Pain Intensity Before and 30 Minute After Study Drug Administration in Participants With Trauma/Musculoskeletal Pain
The outcome measure is the average change in pain score. Change in pain score is calculated for each participant by subtracting the post-treatment pain score from the pretreatment pain score (i.e. pre-treatment pain score minus post-treatment pain score), then averaging them within each group. The pain score is collected using the visual analog scale, which is a 100mm line that participants make a mark on to indicate their pain intensity. The line is then measured from the left end of the line to where the mark was made. The minimum value is 0mm (left end of the line) being no pain and the maximum value is 100mm (right end of the line) being the worst pain possible.
30 min
Difference of Pain Intensity Before and 30 Minute After Study Drug Administration in Participants With Viral Pain
The outcome measure is the average change in pain score. Change in pain score is calculated for each participant by subtracting the post-treatment pain score from the pretreatment pain score (i.e. pre-treatment pain score minus post-treatment pain score), then averaging them within each group. The pain score is collected using the visual analog scale, which is a 100mm line that participants make a mark on to indicate their pain intensity. The line is then measured from the left end of the line to where the mark was made. The minimum value is 0mm (left end of the line) being no pain and the maximum value is 100mm (right end of the line) being the worst pain possible.
30 min
Study Arms (3)
0 mg
PLACEBO COMPARATOR0 mg ketorolac - placebo
10 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATOR10 mg ketorolac - low dose ketorolac
30 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 mg ketorolac - usual dose ketorolac
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \> 18 y/o
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant allergic other contraindication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri Health Care
Columbia, Missouri, 65212, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study enrollment ended early, resulting in less than half of the number of participants needed according to the power analysis. Our study site was closed to enrollment during the recent pandemic, and there was major supply chain issues for saline and IV equipment. Ultimately the study was closed due to the extenuating circumstances.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew Robinson
- Organization
- University of Missouri
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Robinson, MD
University of Missouri-Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- blinded drug
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2018
First Posted
March 14, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2018
Primary Completion
May 30, 2024
Study Completion
May 30, 2024
Last Updated
November 5, 2024
Results First Posted
November 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10