NCT04113499

Brief Summary

This trial is to compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing immediate endoscopic necrosectomy compared to step-up endoscopic interventions in patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
11

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2019

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2019

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 27, 2019

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 12, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 11, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

pancreatic necrosispancreatic necrotic collectiontransenteric drainagenecrosectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of treatment success

    Treatment success is defined as the resolution of necrotic collection on CT scan in association with clinical resolution of symptoms at 6-month follow-up

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Rate of resolution of pre-intervention systemic inflammatory response syndrome

    72 hours post index procedure

  • Rate of resolution of at least 1 pre-intervention organ failure

    72 hours post index procedure

  • Number of re-admissions

    6 months

  • Rate of technical success for EUS-guided cystogastrostomy

    24 hours

  • Rate of technical success for endoscopic necrosectomy

    6 months

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The subject will have endoscopic drainage and necrosectomy at the time of the index intervention.

Procedure: Direct Endoscopic Intervention

Step-up Endoscopic Interventions

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The subject will only have endoscopic drainage of the pancreatic necrotic collection at the time of index intervention.

Procedure: Step-up Endoscopic Intervention

Interventions

The necrotic collection is first identified using a linear echoendoscope. A Hot AXIOS stent is utilized in all patients for EUS-guided drainage of the necrotic collection. The necrotic material is sent for gram stain and culture with sensitivities. For endoscopic necrosectomy, in patients allocated to direct endoscopic necrosectomy group, endoscopic necrosectomy is performed during the same session as the index endoscopic drainage. It is performed using a therapeutic gastroscope and various accessories (see below for further details) for 90 to 120 minutes.

Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy

The necrotic collection is first identified using a linear echoendoscope. A Hot AXIOS stent is utilized in all patients for EUS-guided drainage of the necrotic collection. The necrotic material is sent for gram stain and culture with sensitivities. In patients allocated to the step-up endoscopic interventions group, endoscopic necrosectomy is not performed at the time of the index intervention, however it is performed when clinically indicated during the follow-up period (6 months from index intervention).

Step-up Endoscopic Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject (or when applicable the subject's LAR) is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements
  • The subject (or when applicable the subject's LAR) is able to understand and willing to sign an informed consent form prior to the initiation of any study procedures
  • Males or females ≥ 18 years of age
  • Necrotic collection diagnosed on MRI or CT abdomen/pelvis (seen as a fluid collection in the setting of documented pancreatic necrosis that contains necrotic material and encased within a partial or complete wall)
  • Necrotic collection of any size with ≥ 33% of solid/necrotic component and any no. of loculations, located within the pancreatic/peri-pancreatic space
  • Necrotic collection visualized on EUS and amenable to EUS-guided drainage
  • Suspected/confirmed infected necrotic collection. Infected necrosis is defined by the presence of gas in the necrotic collection on cross-sectional imaging or positive culture of necrotic tissue obtained preprocedure or at first intervention. Infected necrosis is also suspected when sepsis is persistent or in the presence of ongoing clinical deterioration.
  • Documented history of acute pancreatitis Acute pancreatitis is diagnosed if 2 of the following 3 criteria are met
  • Abdominal pain characteristic of acute pancreatitis
  • Serum lipase/amylase ≥ x3 upper limit of normal
  • Characteristic radiological findings of acute pancreatitis on CECT/MRI/US abdomen, such as homogeneous enhancement of pancreatic parenchyma, standing of peripancreatic fat
  • Able to undergo general anesthesia

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who are pregnant or lactating. Pregnancy for females of childbearing potential will be determined by routine preoperative urine or serum HCG testing.
  • Irreversible coagulopathy (INR \>1.5, thrombocytopenia with platelet count \<50,000/mL)
  • Has surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy such as but not limited to Billroth II, Roux-en-Y, gastric bypass
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Unable to obtain consent for the procedure from either the patient or LAR
  • Use of anticoagulants that cannot be discontinued for the procedure
  • Unable to tolerate general anesthesia
  • Necrotic collection that is not accessible for EUS-guided drainage
  • Percutaneous drainage of the necrotic collection is required or performed prior to EUS-guided drainage

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Interventional Endoscopy

Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Yadav D, Lowenfels AB. The epidemiology of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1252-61. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.068.

    PMID: 23622135BACKGROUND
  • Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, Crockett SD, McGowan CE, Bulsiewicz WJ, Gangarosa LM, Thiny MT, Stizenberg K, Morgan DR, Ringel Y, Kim HP, DiBonaventura MD, Carroll CF, Allen JK, Cook SF, Sandler RS, Kappelman MD, Shaheen NJ. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.

    PMID: 22885331BACKGROUND
  • Beger HG, Rau B, Mayer J, Pralle U. Natural course of acute pancreatitis. World J Surg. 1997 Feb;21(2):130-5. doi: 10.1007/s002689900204.

    PMID: 8995067BACKGROUND
  • Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013 Jan;62(1):102-11. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

    PMID: 23100216BACKGROUND
  • van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Bollen TL, Fockens P, Gooszen HG, van Santvoort HC; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov;10(11):1190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 18.

    PMID: 22610008BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Arnoletti JP, Holt BA, Sutton B, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U, Feranec N, Wilcox CM, Tharian B, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. An Endoscopic Transluminal Approach, Compared With Minimally Invasive Surgery, Reduces Complications and Costs for Patients With Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2019 Mar;156(4):1027-1040.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Nov 16.

    PMID: 30452918BACKGROUND
  • Gardner TB, Chahal P, Papachristou GI, Vege SS, Petersen BT, Gostout CJ, Topazian MD, Takahashi N, Sarr MG, Baron TH. A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 May;69(6):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.061. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

    PMID: 19243764BACKGROUND
  • Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Nov;15(11):2080-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1621-8. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

    PMID: 21786063BACKGROUND
  • Yan L, Dargan A, Nieto J, Shariaha RZ, Binmoeller KF, Adler DG, DeSimone M, Berzin T, Swahney M, Draganov PV, Yang DJ, Diehl DL, Wang L, Ghulab A, Butt N, Siddiqui AA. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy at the time of transmural stent placement results in earlier resolution of complex walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Results from a large multicenter United States trial. Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):172-179. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_108_17.

    PMID: 29882517BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Sutton B, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut. 2019 Jul;68(7):1200-1209. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315335. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

    PMID: 29858393BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U, Sutton B, Frandah W, Siddique S, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: When and for whom? Dig Endosc. 2017 Jan;29(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/den.12681. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

    PMID: 27199157BACKGROUND
  • Bang JY, Lakhtakia S, Thakkar S, Buxbaum JL, Waxman I, Sutton B, Memon SF, Singh S, Basha J, Singh A, Navaneethan U, Hawes RH, Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S; United States Pancreatic Disease Study Group. Upfront endoscopic necrosectomy or step-up endoscopic approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis (DESTIN): a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;9(1):22-33. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00331-X. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PancreatitisPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Muhammad Hasan, MD

    AdventHealth

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
During follow up, the coordinators that are contacting the subjects will be blinded to the randomization assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2019

First Posted

October 2, 2019

Study Start

November 27, 2019

Primary Completion

April 25, 2022

Study Completion

April 25, 2022

Last Updated

July 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations